Call of Duty: Black Ops III PC graphics performance benchmark review

Game reviews 127 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for Call of Duty: Black Ops III PC graphics performance benchmark review on our message forum
#5184696
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245451.jpg
You need to restart the game if you change any graphical options as it doesn't flush the textures from the vram. Makes it frustrating to find the perfect balance of settings. Extra textures, Motion Blur and Volumetric Lighting are the source of low performance. Motion Blur was the biggest offender (maybe crossfire problem). The FPS cap doesn't really work for me either. I set it to 240 and it will become 200-230. Set to 120 and it will be 100-118. 200 and it will be 170-188. Although I had the exact same problem with Black Ops II. An external limiter will result in the fps being exactly solid at the cap. Also it doesn't matter how much VRAM you have. By default the game will target to utilize 90% of it by keeping all textures loaded so they don't need to be streamed in again.
#5184756
data/avatar/default/avatar20.webp
Does anyone else having fps goes down to 18 fps ? at the start it reaches to low as 15 when you go out the airport tower. Everything is on max. 1920x1080p Filimc x2 SMAA
You need to restart the game if you change any graphical options as it doesn't flush the textures from the vram. Makes it frustrating to find the perfect balance of settings. Extra textures, Motion Blur and Volumetric Lighting are the source of low performance. Motion Blur was the biggest offender (maybe crossfire problem). The FPS cap doesn't really work for me either. I set it to 240 and it will become 200-230. Set to 120 and it will be 100-118. 200 and it will be 170-188. Although I had the exact same problem with Black Ops II. An external limiter will result in the fps being exactly solid at the cap. Also it doesn't matter how much VRAM you have. By default the game will target to utilize 90% of it by keeping all textures loaded so they don't need to be streamed in again.
So when can you use those settings ? only 980 TI SLI ? I don't know what people talk, the graphics are amazing in 3D. I mean people who don't play in 3D have no idea what they are missing. Using Tridef the game is amazing.
#5184767
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/185/185964.jpg
You need to restart the game if you change any graphical options as it doesn't flush the textures from the vram. Makes it frustrating to find the perfect balance of settings. Extra textures, Motion Blur and Volumetric Lighting are the source of low performance. Motion Blur was the biggest offender (maybe crossfire problem). The FPS cap doesn't really work for me either. I set it to 240 and it will become 200-230. Set to 120 and it will be 100-118. 200 and it will be 170-188. Although I had the exact same problem with Black Ops II. An external limiter will result in the fps being exactly solid at the cap. Also it doesn't matter how much VRAM you have. By default the game will target to utilize 90% of it by keeping all textures loaded so they don't need to be streamed in again.
According to the .ini, it would even be 95% in my case. Nice touch seeing they removed their encryption on the config file again.
#5184774
data/avatar/default/avatar08.webp
Hmm... strange, runs very good on my side, not a single crash everything maxed out, just textures "high" on 5910x1080 triple screen. Could be because of 16gb memory, or the SSD?
#5184783
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
You might want to check the page 1 and 2 titles, they state it's CoD: Advanced Warfare and not Black Ops.
#5184809
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/101/101307.jpg
Once again the longevity of Nvidia cards are found wanting. The 290 is still performing strong. Titan users must feel robbed.
#5184813
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258926.jpg
ermm... 36 at least i can taste some consoles cinematic experience
#5184833
data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp
Cant hurt to try, I know lots of people say that as long as you have X amount of ram, then windows should be fine without it. For some games it could cause an issue if they're designed with the page file in mind. @Monchis That's a different error altogether.
They are all a buffer overruns. Who knows, 353.49 might fix his problem too.
#5184840
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/240/240605.jpg
Ah yes finally, article finished. Beer time. This was the most annoying day ever. The number of times the game exe crashed on me .. unbelievable. Can I get a group hug ? 🙂
Big hug boss. You´re really the fatest name in the tech forums, whenever i see you face pic on youtube i just feel like throwing an angry bird at you. Stay awesome.
#5184869
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/54/54823.jpg
Lol kepler
#5184878
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/186/186380.jpg
What pissed me off is the beta played fine on my system........
#5184882
data/avatar/default/avatar05.webp
According to OC3D it has major memory leaks and requires ~12GB RAM in certain situations.
#5184887
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/262/262699.jpg
and this is why i hate indie games like call of broken every year plus the nvidia software forced inside won't help anyone
#5184891
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/214/214099.jpg
Lol kepler
11/7/2016 COD: Black Ops 4 PC graphics performance review lol maxwell Really nothing to be laughing about here, unless you enjoy upgrading your GPU every year.
#5184904
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/54/54823.jpg
11/7/2016 COD: Black Ops 4 PC graphics performance review lol maxwell Really nothing to be laughing about here, unless you enjoy upgrading your GPU every year.
780 Ti 42FPS R9 290 51FPS Now that's funny! I find CoD incredibly boring now as it's the same crap over and over, so if Maxwell were put in that position, I wouldn't care. By the time BO4 comes out I'll have the next best thing.
#5184906
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
Yeah Keplers are not doing well lately. There are no real answer coming from NV on that one.
If Keplers are only faults,then again Nv or devs just put too much Tessellation in this game. Gtx 770 This game is... (I have no need for ban due to...) It is not Kepler, ir is not Maxwell, it is not GCN something. It is poor resource management on engine side. GTX 970 is GTX980 with just 1/8th disabled, yet 980 performs 24~35% better based on resolution. 390X touches Fury. R9-290 is 14% behind gtx970 on 1080p, but then on 1440p it is 9% faster. And finally on 4k they are match in performance. This game does not take sides, they made it to battle every single GPU owner out there. Now, it is as usually in hands on nV/AMD to fix this mess.
#5184912
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/260/260826.jpg
I know some game dev doesn't care a sh** about what we think of them AFTER we buy their games but... ...ain't nobody at Treyarch aware of the Steam refund policy and the "Batman Gate"? :3eyes:
#5184915
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
I know some game dev doesn't care a sh** about what we think of them AFTER we buy their games but... ...ain't nobody at Treyarch aware of the Steam refund policy and the "Batman Gate"? :3eyes:
No, they want to give you 'This Special Opportunity' to feel like Eric Cartman. [youtube]_KqqRPvM_Sw[/youtube]
#5184919
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/259/259774.jpg
blah blah blah This is one of the reasons why BF kicks COD's a$$ in PC next year! next COD i hope to be from modern warfare series and have more optimized for PC .... I don't buy COD:BO III ..... maybe after some prise off ... 😀

Previous Page

Next Page