AMD unveiling Radeon RX product stack with 480 - 470 and 460

moab600

2016-06-13 22:22

i wanna see performance already... if all their product deliver best performance per dollar, AMD might finally turn around the wheel.

#5288957

Xionor

2016-06-13 22:30

Maybe the performance is just mediocre so thats why they're not showing it? I mean what is there to hide at this point, Nvidia has already revealed their performance numbers so it's not like it's about manufacturer secrets anymore..

#5288958

Battlefieldprin

2016-06-13 22:36

Seriously , these tiny cards behind all the hassle ! AMD you are really rolling back . Although , I buy only Nvidia , but AMD always keeps it in check in matter of price and performance.

#5288961

eTheBlack

2016-06-13 22:39

Seriously , these tiny cards behind all the hassle ! AMD you are really rolling back . Although , I buy only Nvidia , but AMD always keeps it in check in matter of price and performance.

I think you don't understand AMD what they want to archive here. They want best GPU per buck. Lets say 1080 will get 100fps but cost 700€+, while with 480 you will get let's say 45fps+ for 200€.

#5288970

RzrTrek

2016-06-13 22:58

I'm no longer interested in AMD.

#5288977

bigfutus

2016-06-13 23:09

I think you don't understand AMD what they want to archive here. They want best GPU per buck. Lets say 1080 will get 100fps but cost 700€+, while with 480 you will get let's say 45fps+ for 200€.

So Nvidia has only to deliver 1060 with 50fps for 250€?

#5288982

NAZ2222

2016-06-13 23:15

So Nvidia has only to deliver 1060 with 50fps for 250€?

Dat math, with 50fps for 250$ Nvidia would still loose to the RX 480 in the bang for buck categorie.

#5288991

Stormyandcold

2016-06-13 23:22

I think you don't understand AMD what they want to archive here. They want best GPU per buck. Lets say 1080 will get 100fps but cost 700€+, while with 480 you will get let's say 45fps+ for 200€.

F*** 45fps. End of. That s*** doesn't roll with me. If you're willing to accept that, then, just buy a console. Bring on big Polaris, this low-end stuff holds back PC gaming. Yes, it's a big market, but, it's the PC equivalent of consoles performance-wise tbh.

#5288993

RzrTrek

2016-06-13 23:23

Not all people play demanding and ****ty games like Battlefield.

#5288994

Sukovsky

2016-06-13 23:23

AMD killed it for me with their ****ty hypemachine time and time again. Maybe Zen, prolly not.

#5289000

Stormyandcold

2016-06-13 23:28

Not all people play demanding and ****ty games like Battlefield.

F*** Battlefield tbh.

#5289001

Agonist

2016-06-13 23:28

F*** 45fps. End of. That s*** doesn't roll with me. If you're willing to accept that, then, just buy a console. Bring on big Polaris, this low-end stuff holds back PC gaming. Yes, it's a big market, but, it's the PC equivalent of consoles performance-wise tbh.

CRY MORE! Guess what, these are the markets that bring the most cash in for PC, not just hardware. Grow the hell up.

#5289002

Stormyandcold

2016-06-13 23:29

CRY MORE! Guess what, these are the markets that bring the most cash in for PC, not just hardware. Grow the hell up.

Says Fury X owner.

#5289004

warlord

2016-06-13 23:32

You should understand that selling 12 gpus with 250$ (3000$ total) is better than selling 2 gpus with 750$(1500$ total) for any company out there. So AMD knows that better than anyone who cries and bashing for that mediocre perf.

#5289008

Spartan

2016-06-13 23:36

You should understand that selling 12 gpus with 250$ (3000$ total) is better than selling 2 gpus with 750$(1500$ total) for any company out there. So AMD knows that better than anyone who cries and bashing for that mediocre perf.

Somehow I doubt low end gpu owners are going to jump into these, but we will see.

#5289009

labidas

2016-06-13 23:36

F*** 45fps. End of. That s*** doesn't roll with me. If you're willing to accept that, then, just buy a console. Bring on big Polaris, this low-end stuff holds back PC gaming. Yes, it's a big market, but, it's the PC equivalent of consoles performance-wise tbh.

RX480 wont be 45% of gtx1080. Firestrike benches already puts it ahead of GTX980 which means you'll get atleast 55~60% of 1080 performance for 200~250$ (and in ashes crossfire is ahead of 1080, but it's amd bias). + we don't know how much this thing can overclock. Seeing nVidia at 2ghz makes me hopeful for AMD, but we'll see shortly what 14nm brings. It's coming out 30th of June, right? Time to sell my king, the 290, it has served me well.

#5289010

warlord

2016-06-13 23:39

Somehow I doubt low end gpu owners are going to jump into these, but we will see.

Well it depends some lower end gpus are not providing smooth gameplay experience even at @1080p. Some people including me need a stronger GPU just for pathetic 1080p with a price tag lower than or equal with 299$.

#5289011

Stormyandcold

2016-06-13 23:42

RX480 wont be 45% of gtx1080. Firestrike benches already puts it ahead of GTX980 which means you'll get atleast 55~60% of 1080 performance for 200~250$ (and in ashes crossfire is ahead of 1080, but it's amd bias). + we don't know how much this thing can overclock. Seeing nVidia at 2ghz makes me hopeful for AMD, but we'll see shortly what 14nm brings. It's coming out 30th of June, right? Time to sell my king, the 290, it has served me well.

Nothing wrong with 480, very good product that I've already commented on. It's these people advocating 45fps as a good thing that does my head in. Who in their right mind would recommend a product that gives 45fps over something that gives closer to 60fps? I wouldn't do that to my enemies. Sorry.

#5289013

Turanis

2016-06-13 23:47

Amd needs more market share,so if some of you cry because they dont have something to be equal of 700$+ Gtx 1080 they dont care now. Vega its for you.Or maybe later they will give us RX 490 at the right price. The rest of 80% gamers will be glad to buy 100-200$ cards.The 20% market from enthusiast gamers is still low but Amd will bring us Vega.

#5289014

Undying

2016-06-13 23:48

Who in their right mind would recommend a product that gives 45fps over something that gives closer to 60fps? I wouldn't do that to my enemies. Sorry.

The one who dosnt want to buy that overpriced 1070 like you did. Paying 500€ for it is just wrong.