Maybe they should collaborate to fix Windows 10's scheduler for Ryzen. And I thought it was OCP corporation....

Maybe they should collaborate to fix W6ndows 10's scheduler for Ryzen. And I thought it was OCP corporation....

It is allready the case. In fact, what we can ask, is why MS has not fix it allready, but as many "patch" have been delayed... I ask me if insiders windows 10 program ( creator update) can test if the fix is allreay there. This said, dont expect miracle... this will not make a 1800x to beat a 7700K in single threaded applications, but will resolve some inconsistency vs the 6900 in some games. 6700K-7700K are quadcore clocked really high. 8 cores are constrained by the TDP vs clock speed. ( 4.5ghz vs 4ghz )

It is allready the case. In fact, what we can ask, is why MS has not fix it allready, but as many "patch" have been delayed... I ask me if insiders windows 10 program ( creator update) can test if the fix is allreay there. This said, dont expect miracle... this will not make a 1800x to beat a 7700K in single threaded applications, but will resolve some inconsistency vs the 6900 in some games. 6700K-7700K are quadcore clocked really high. 8 cores are constrained by the TDP vs clock speed. ( 4.5ghz vs 4ghz )

As it should be the 1800x vs the 6900k not the 7700k

Windows 7 is getting more fps than w10 with RyZen, w10 is detecting 16 physical cores and 136MB total cache (lv2+lv3) :infinity: as Windows 7 with Bulldozer, said 8 physical cores up to get updated... maybe we´ll see two hotfixes soon... 😛c1:

Waste of valuable resources...Prioritization!