AMD Gives Statement on the PCI-Express Overcurrent Problems
Click here to post a comment for AMD Gives Statement on the PCI-Express Overcurrent Problems on our message forum
Devilhunter12
Of course they will lower the clocks of 480 and card will throttle. AMD is doing a very simple logic.
__hollywood|meo
theyre having a field day trolling at [H] about this. the discussions ceiling is so low i cant be bothered to chime in there. more on topic, im glad AMD is doing something about this problem quickly however. making mistakes isnt wat we should base judgement on; its how mistakes are addressed & rectified that matters...coming from someone who has owned plenty of team greens gpus over the years
Devilhunter12
pharma
According to Ryan Smith it could affect reviews depending on what the root cause is.
"If power is somehow being wasted and it can be stopped (think leaking hose) then no. However if the issue is that power consumption is just being allowed to go too high (think a hose turned up higher) then yes, the card would need to be throttled back to avoid breaking power containment."
I guess nobody can blame AMD for last minute clocks/voltage changes to be more competitive, but they forgot (or turned blind eye) PCI-E certification. Seems like reviews will need to be redone ....
WhiteLightning
Moderator
If they will lower the clocks, i wonder how much of a difference it will make with benchmark scores. not that much i reckon. In any way it is sloppy work if it falls out of specification.
Undying
I dont see this effecting the non-reference cards in the future. People should not be forgeting that.
Statement is for reference cards only using one 6pin.
0blivious
Anarion
So there was some wonky stuff. Good thing that they admit it and are working on fixing it. I hope it doesn't lower the performance noticeably.
moeppel
Alessio1989
Lol too much tuning. This reminds me what did their first competitor with last cards (except thei introduced throtteling to pair the power issue).
CalculuS
Turanis
Lest see this
Polaris - Power Problems or PCI Exaggeration?
Devilhunter12
moeppel
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/4qoclm/german_site_explores_the_potential_for/
I cannot seem to find any true English resources on the subject. And I'm quite bad at electrical engineering :P
cowie
cowie
SirDremor
Hilbert, can you clarify - you mentioned (and all of us read in review), that the card pulls 166W, but then you said, that you could not replicate issues. What did you mean?
166W is an issue in itself, no?
CalculuS
RzrTrek
Another nail in the coffin.
sammarbella
It's very possible that all this mess was caused by some AMD PR exec decisions to make 480 appear as the power efficient champion using only a 6 pin power connector and at the same time increase the GPU clocks beyond what is reasonable with this power supply.
Now the driver team (software) with the help of engineers (hardware) must clean this mess lowering the sold GPUs power needs...and performance via drivers.
A better option could be to flash a modified bios but this is not a normal (and secure) operation for end users.
In a perfect world all AMD 480 GPUs will be recalled and substituted with at revised GPU with at least a 8 pin power connector.We don't live in a perfect world and GPUs are not cars. 🤓
It will be interesting to compare the performance of custom PCB 480 models with 8 pin connectors and better cooling (Sapphire RX 480 Nitro...) VS the reference model at launch VS the reference model with limited power needs in a next drivers version.
We need some AMD GPUs success (even Nvidia users): real competition is needed to lower prices and get faster hardware improvements.