Adata passes 8,100 MT/s with overclocked XPG DDR5 memory
Click here to post a comment for Adata passes 8,100 MT/s with overclocked XPG DDR5 memory on our message forum
King Mustard
Let's see if they bait and switch it for DDR2.
ViperAnaf
AMD Fanboy: something about Latency, something about TDP, something about number of cores, something about nanometer...
Intel Fanboy: Higher fps.
IceVip
Shh.. don’t sum it up like that, there’ll be nothing else left to talk about.
schmidtbag
Other than latency, they're all stupid things to brag/argue about nowadays.
TDP (or more accurately, power consumption) matters, but only when comparing performance-per-watt.
Airbud
https://media0.giphy.com/media/8Iv5lqKwKsZ2g/giphy.gif
:p
ViperAnaf
doesnt matter for me unless I care about heating up during OC - and even then every CPU is different... It can have a nice TDP number on paper like my current 5950x but its burning hot during OC/load or have a terrible TDP number on paper like 11900k but has pretty nice temps during OC/load....
jose2016
And the thing is, that ddr5 will perform better than ddr4, but turning it up in voltage.
schmidtbag
That's why I was saying performance-per-watt is what really matters. Doesn't matter if your CPU consumes 15W if it's slower than a Core2 Duo. Doesn't matter if your CPU consumes 400W if it outperforms a 256 core Epyc server. When it comes to gaming, just about any x86 desktop 8-core CPU made within the past 4 years will get you all the performance you'll need, so, just pick whichever one has the best performance-per-watt. And even then, most 6-cores will do just fine.
FlyBy
1.35v ?
Didn't they say more bandwidth at lower power consumption ?
6400MT/s @ 1.35v what will it take to go to those speeds where DDR5 finally makes sense ? 12800 @1.50v ??
kapu
Everyone is right
