#5475633

Jeffs

2017-09-26 08:20

Wait what? Aim assist on the PC edition?

#5475636

lucidus

2017-09-26 08:23

Jeffs:

Wait what? Aim assist on the PC edition?

I remember BO3 had it and people were basically cheating by playing with the controller lol.

#5475646

fantaskarsef

2017-09-26 08:55

Console play on PC with aim assist = admitting you're sh1te. Graphics look good as usual, might wait a bit to grab it on discount as I'm not really interested in the multiplayer personally.

#5475648

Kaerar

2017-09-26 09:06

They had a controller plugged in and used Keyboard and Mouse. Though the P2P communication of the game was the worst aspect. Despite claims of dedicated servers, the game still had crap rego and heavy lag comp giving high ping users even more of a benefit.

#5475671

chalky

2017-09-26 11:40

Aim assist really,maybe they should put 5 years and older on the box

#5475672

XP-200

2017-09-26 11:43

None of this will really matters as the game will be hacked and have aim bots up the wazzo a month after it is released as per the usual with COD PC releases on PC. lol

#5475715

sammarbella

2017-09-26 13:47

DX11.

#5475739

Silva

2017-09-26 14:43

Recommended Requirements: CPU: Intel Core™ i5-2400 / AMD Ryzen R5 1600X Say what? Another shitty port?

#5475745

airbud7

2017-09-26 15:03

Silva:

Recommended Requirements: CPU: Intel Core™ i5-2400 / AMD Ryzen R5 1600X Say what? Another shitty port?

why would you say that?

#5475749

Silva

2017-09-26 15:09

airbud7:

why would you say that?

Because the i5-2400 is a 4c/4t cpu with base clock 3.1Ghz and R5 1600X is a 6c/12t cpu with base clock 3.6Ghz. I would never consider those too cpu's at the same level of performance, plus comparisons on the internet would indicate the R5 1600X is a superior cpu either for gaming or productivity. I never trust game requirements as most is just laughable.

#5475751

nz3777

2017-09-26 15:11

Looks like its time to upgrade Nick, Fx 8320e and Gtx 980 this cpu is not bad but it does not support new memory standards ect, time to go bye bye Fx! This game is going to be hella-fun you can just tell!

#5475897

icedman

2017-09-26 19:33

I don't understand how they can put the 1600x in the same performance as any i5 if anything it comes close if not beats the 7700k where applications are threaded at least. as for the auto aim its a joke it totally ruined gta5 for me as its unplayable without it online.

#5475904

FrostNixon

2017-09-26 19:41

25gb HD and 12gb RAM, rofl, what in 5 years we will need more ram than hd space?

#5475916

Monchis

2017-09-26 20:37

Well, as usual the requirements are set or rearranged by some idiot at the plublisher offices. Usually activision makes very good ports for COD (unlike treyarch) so I wouldn´t be worried.

#5476130

Stormyandcold

2017-09-27 13:13

Monchis:

Well, as usual the requirements are set or rearranged by some idiot at the plublisher offices. Usually activision makes very good ports for COD (unlike treyarch) so I wouldn´t be worried.

Treyarch's BO3 is the best one out of the last 3 for mp, though imho.

#5476213

Monchis

2017-09-27 16:35

Stormyandcold:

Treyarch's BO3 is the best one out of the last 3 for mp, though imho.

Well I had singleplayer in mind, they were hideous, I didn´t even bother with the latest BO. Last decent port I played from them was World at war, and still the part of the tanks it took like three generations of graphics to run smoothly.

#5476230

vbetts

Moderator

2017-09-27 17:05

Silva:

Because the i5-2400 is a 4c/4t cpu with base clock 3.1Ghz and R5 1600X is a 6c/12t cpu with base clock 3.6Ghz. I would never consider those too cpu's at the same level of performance, plus comparisons on the internet would indicate the R5 1600X is a superior cpu either for gaming or productivity. I never trust game requirements as most is just laughable.

I think it's more based on current trends from Intel and AMD.

Stormyandcold:

Treyarch's BO3 is the best one out of the last 3 for mp, though imho.

For me, I have to say it's MW2, BO, then BO3.