35 Watt Core i5 4570T Benchmarks
Click here to post a comment for 35 Watt Core i5 4570T Benchmarks on our message forum
tsunami231
Ramdisk, nothing new about them
holystarlight
tsunami231
its ramdisk that only way ones gets those kind read/writes speeds
holystarlight
http://s14.postimg.org/n3t4oh7pd/bench.jpg
Doesn't look like any ramdisk iv used, as you can see, from the image running a benchmark on my C: drive, as I explained before, its works more like a buffer than a ramdisk. anyway, gotta say this program does do some magic when transferring files from one HDD to another, and access times have improved greatly.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
It's a RAMCache not a logical ramdisk, so yes this functions as a buffer.
I'd be a bit careful though with power loss / unexpected resets / crashes as critical data will get lost when that happens. Other then that it indeed is that fastest cache you can create.
Pill Monster
FatBoyNL
With 1 run of 50MB the HDD or SSD is not even used at all.
Please try it again with multiple runs of blocks larger than the cache size. For example, test 4x 500MB. I wonder what results that would show.
holystarlight
http://s9.postimg.org/8id34a9vj/basic.jpg
with cache 4x 500mb
http://s23.postimg.org/j2ccrwz6z/4x_500.jpg
And with 4x 2000mb
http://s15.postimg.org/7azz3dxq3/4x_2000mb.jpg
4x 4000mb
http://s16.postimg.org/qxc0k85th/4x_4000mb.jpg
And with AS SSD bench
http://s13.postimg.org/ids9e05g7/AS_SSD.jpg
Very impressive results, Cache size I'm using is 4096 with block size 16 on a SSD OCZ Agility 3.
http://s12.postimg.org/in1epkeyl/settings.jpg
ill test
Without Cache 4x 500mb
holystarlight
http://s23.postimg.org/k1pc1rr57/fiile_transfer_windows.jpg
Here is test done with and without the cache copying the same file to and from same locations, first copy is with the cache on, and the second is without.
http://s16.postimg.org/kblyym2r8/file_test.jpg
Also to note that primoCahce uses something called Defer-Write with a latency delay, which is customizable.
this is copying a 3.6gb ISO image from one HDD to another both HDD using a 4096 cache with block size 16. the file copies so quickly that kinda hard to screenshot it lol. so I did another test.
FatBoyNL
Those results look promising!
But the improved reads will only shine when the data to be fetched has been cached already. A 40GB SSD cache drive using Intel Smart Response Technology will cache the most accessed data 'more permanently' (but a lot slower).
PrimoCache probably does the same thing by software in RAM. Shutdows will be slower as the data has to be written to the HDD and startups will be slower due to starting caching the data from the disk. In the background probably.
About the writes. When you copy a very large file from G- to C-drive, at what speed does the action end? The file still needs to be copied to the slower HDD, so I reckon the speed rate will fall dramatically at the end of the copying action (or at shutdown or other checkpoints).
Please show us a screenshot of a 10GB copying action over those drives at 99% completion 😉
I'm just kidding, I'm very interested about this topic. But from my (professional) experience, it's very hard to notice any improvement except for specific situations (which I haven't found yet really 🙁).
holystarlight
http://s9.postimg.org/hn0tjfsxb/test_10gb_file.jpg
And without
http://s9.postimg.org/y9idsilv3/without_cache_10gb.jpg
The program does have a L2 cache that can be used on a dedicated SSD like how Intel Smart Response Technology works.
[Quote]Level-2 Cache: Uses SSD, flash drive, or other faster device as a secondary cache which will speed up traditional slow hard disks. Cache contents stored in level-2 storage are persistent across computer restarts. Users must not "offline" modify the contents of a volume which is being cached by level-2 cache.
Level-2 Storage: A volume formatted to provide cache and store cached data. To create a level-2 storage, click "Create/Manage Level-2 Storages" button. Note: only partitions on Basic MBR disks are supported to be level-2 storages.[/Quote]
Also you can choose which Algorithm the program uses
[Quote]Algorithm: Determines which blocks to discard to make room for new data when cache is full.
LRU (Least Recently Used): Discards the least recently used data first.
LFU-R (Least Frequently Used): Counts how often a data block is needed. Data blocks that are used least often will be discarded first.
but I haven't a spare SSD to test it out the L2 Cache, but I haven't noticed any slow shut downs or start up, Task manager doesn't show the program running in the background either,
Ill test copying a larger file like 10gb but I haven't a 10gb to test with so ill make one and post a bench or two.
with cache
Chillin
While I'm usually skeptical about such programs, this one seems to be the real deal.
I have set up 512mb of cache to read only (I don't trust writes with a power failure risk) on a WD 1TB Caviar Black (first gen) and here are the results:
Without:
http://s17.postimg.org/mf2d6aby7/without.jpg
With:
http://s17.postimg.org/uylr41kan/with.jpg
I'm going to see if I see any difference in BF3 map loading time.
holystarlight
sykozis
I decided to give this a try. I setup a 512mb read "cache" for my data drive. Copied files ranging from 700mb to 4.5GB. On the 700mb files, it was roughly 1-2 sec faster. On the 4.5GB file, it was noticeable slower. I retested the 4.5GB file with a 1024mb read "cache" with no improvement. Since I tend to transfer several GB of data from drive to drive on a regular basis...this software appears to be pretty useless for me. Since most harddrive benchmarks are synthetic, their results are meaningless. According to the data transfer progress window, the data transfer rate was higher with this software.....but the actual data transfer TIME was noticeably slower with my 4.5GB file (which is actually the full OpenSuSE x64 disc ISO).
holystarlight
Pill Monster
sykozis
Pill Monster