Update: Netflix 4K streaming on a Windows 10 PC Tested with GPUs
Last week we mentioned in a news-item that only the new and upcoming Kaby Lake processors would be able to handly Netflix in Ultra HD on a Windows PC in combination with Microsoft’s Edge browser. This has now been tested with graphics cards.
German website Heise tested a number of hardware configurations in relation to 4K streaming, as it turns out modern graphics cards such as the GeForce GTX 1000 series and Radeon RX 400 series can’t display Netflix’s 4K content. Streaming 4K content is limited to Microsoft’s Edge browser solely, it is rediculous that it cannot even be watched with the official Windows 10 Netflix app (word however is that Netflix is working on this APP wise).
Netflix only switched to the 4K resolution when an Intel CPU of the 7th generation (Kaby Lake) is available. Now it is not something the graphics cards couldn't handle, but it's more a PlayReady 3.0 copy protection thing as the GPU or driver needs to support PlayReady 3.0 SL3000 and HDCP 2.2 copy protections.
Heise sums it is very simple, ” it’s astonishing that modern AMD-Polaris and Nvidia-Pascal graphics cards are not supported, although they support HDMI 2.0b and HDCP 2.2″. We think support will be added in the not so far future, AMD previously told Heise that Polaris should get PlayReady 3.0 support through a driver update.
Update: Thermal Imaging - 09/30/2015 01:04 PM
Our recent AMD Radeon R9 NANO review and Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950 Xtreme Gaming review had to do without thermal imaging as our FLIR camera had to be repaired. Some users asked if we could add th...
AMD Issues Roadmap Update: Nothing really new in the pipeline ? - 05/31/2013 01:44 PM
The colleagues of xbit labs report that Advanced Micro Devices has quietly updated its 2013 general product roadmap earlier this month only to reflect the lack of any changes compared to previous ver...
update: 3DMark Vantage - 3Way SLI - GeForce PhysX - 06/22/2008 09:52 AM
After we posted our 3DMark Vantage results in combination with 3-way SLI GeForce GTX 280 / PhysX drivers / and 4200 Mhz CPU overclock I received quite a lot of emails. A couple among them entailed the...
Senior Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: 2003-09-14
And the content/Production companies wonder why so many people copy from Streaming websites and torrent sites.
I tried Amazon and Netflix, and couldn't last more than a day.
Unfortunately, having only a 2Mbit line, i'm only allowed just under VHS quality, which looks extremely sh*t.
I am waiting for one of the dense b'stards that make up the distribution comapnies, to realise that a popcorntime type app, would not only alleviate all their bandwidth issues, but allow the people they want to sell to, to actually consume what they want.!
I don't exactly live in the sticks, its just not well served, by any provider. 5Km+ of copper.
Our tiny holiday village in Crete (which is much more remote than home here) has 12Mbit to the home, ffs. 6x what I have in outskirts of Paris.
So, back on topic : Netflix and Amazon are following the usual model, where all consumers are evil, especially those that pay for the right to be shafted.
"All pirating must be evil, look, we are allowing you to watch our content, with only a few restrictions : Country, language, quality, hardware,....nothing too difficult or resrictive mind you".
Junior Member
Posts: 13
Joined: 2006-11-30
Cheap Wintel stunt, pushing Win10 Kaby Lake

Senior Member
Posts: 3277
Joined: 2006-04-25
The ways to stream Netflix currently:
Web browser.
Built-in TV app.
Roku. (AppleTV, etc)
Tablet/phone.
Nearly ALL new 4k sets already have built in Netflix/app functionality. (find me one that doesn't)
So yeah, I can see why people whine about this. We're clearly getting screwed over.
Senior Member
Posts: 14164
Joined: 2014-07-21
hehe almost reminds me of how I can't even play Sin City 2 in normal HD because my 10 year old 1080p TV doesn't support the latest HDCP

Senior Member
Posts: 112
Joined: 2010-06-18
If (and that's a big if) it has anything to do with the protection technology, it's another case of creating pointless software that only gets in the way for everyone - most of all the regular user/consumer.
If someone wants to copy and distribute something, they will succeed in doing so.
Easy, it's only "protected" if it's made useless - for example: the end user can't see it.
Possible to record the screen and outgoing audio in many ways.
At least the guys coming up with these kind of things get experience and a salary, but that's the only upside I can see to this.