So I woke up this morning, walk to a local PC and check a few things, and then in the forums there is this big post from -Tj-, a forum regular who spotted all kinds of benchmarks nicely sorted with VEGA10 8GB in them.

Admittedly I like to wake up with a nice set of benchmarks, but immediately an alarm bell started ringing and all kinds of red flags popped up. Since the card (VEGA10) isn't even fabbed yet (there are only a few engineering samples around which media would NEVER get access to) these benchmarks had to be rather salty, perfectly modeled in the form that they look to be from a familiar Swedish website as well. The results in the charts are all in Ultra HD and cover all modern graphics cards. Now I could have simply decided to not post this, but in a few hours these will be all over the web anyway, so we'll just do so.

The charts are totally fake, somebody with too much time and Excel or Photoshop wanted a laugh. Also the Vega to Fury ratio is always almost exactly a 1.66% E.g. simply multiplied from a Fury. So make of them what you think. There is no source either other then a postimg.org link.

Update - we just had a quick chat with Jacob from SweClockers, the chart design is definitely theirs, the charts are not. So let's call these what they are, confirmed fake. I'll just leave the results as they are for a good browse and a bit of fun. Check the thumbnails, again we take no credit for them and well, so yeah I think I have written enough disclaimers and warnings here right?