Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review

New Downloads
Prime95 download version 30.9 build 1
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1743
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 WHQL driver download
GeForce 516.59 WHQL driver download
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.22 Download
AMD Chipset Drivers Download v4.06.10.651
CrystalDiskInfo 8.17 Download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 Windows 7 driver download
ReShade download v5.2.2
HWiNFO Download v7.26


New Forum Topics
Chatter: NVIDIA RTX 4090, RTX 4080 and RTX 4070 > 16384 cores, 24 GB GDDR6X, up to 2.75 GHz and 450W TGP AMD Radeon Software - UWP MSI G274QRFW is a White WQHD gaming LCD with Rapid IPS panel ASUS ROG,Aura Sync compatible VGA holder released ASUS releases TUF GAMING TF120 aRGB Fans ASRock Offers Wi-Fi 6E Upgrade Kits for AM4, LGA1700 Motherboards EK Momentum Monoblock for ASUS ROG Z690-I Strix Motherboard QNAP and Intel Partner to Launch the Industrial-Grade TS-i410X 10GbE NAS Solution Micron Introduces Industrial DDR5 Server Memory AMD Might Release and Add Ryzen 5 5600X3D, Ryzen 9 5900X3D (X3D) procs




Guru3D.com » News » NVIDIA’s New GeForce Partner Program Under Criticism

NVIDIA’s New GeForce Partner Program Under Criticism

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/10/2018 09:49 AM | source: | 370 comment(s)
NVIDIA’s New GeForce Partner Program Under Criticism

Affiliate programs in the hardware and any, industry are nothing new. Nvidia, at the start of March, launched a new Geforce Partner Program, however, is causing a stir, allegations now have risen that Nvidia wants to exclusively bind companies and brands to GeForce.

So a story broke earlier yesterday at hardocp, I was out all day and decided to post this a little later as I wanted to dig a little deeper into the implications and accusations. So, let's start by saying this, the sources of the story that broke over there, all have chosen to remain anonymous. But considering the relationship that they have with AMD the last year (Owner Bennett has even been presenting at recent AMD conferences), it is AMD that instigated this story and fed the story to them (as is now reported in their coverage). One thing they mention seems a bit inconsistent (as far as we can check), AMD has not been 'shopping' this story to other websites as far as we know it. Guru3D and other media (I checked with a couple) certainly have not heard from AMD on or about this matter. That said, if the story is correct, the sources do not even matter, as it is a gnarly thing which needs to be shared by media in an effort to get some exposure.

So what is this all about? Nvidia presented its new/updated GPP (GeForce Partner Program) a normally positive program "to better serve gamers", early in March 2018. Basically, Nvidia partners will get NVIDIA TLC when they join up, more of that in a lower paragraph. Nvidia in its latest GPP talks a lot about branding, the program is open and 'free for anyone to join' is also mentioned to be transparent and non-exclusive. However, here’s where the assumption now has risen, AIBs and OEMs have been reluctant to talk about the new GPP as they are a bit scared about the ramifications. Basically as a partner, if you don't join up in the GPP, as a company, you'll be placed in a lower to more 'poor' position with Nvidia.

The culprit; once partners join the GPP program, the partner company now has to have its "Gaming Brand Aligned Exclusively With GeForce." E.g. Intel and AMD would become persona non-grata for the partners that sign up with Nvidia. So the Gigabyte, MSI or ASUSes out there would exclusively work with NVIDIA, and cannot work with not AMD or Intel. It thus looks like that Nvidia plays its cards, but not the way they are meant to be played. Nvidia gives it partners a choice, you can choose to not opt into the program as a partner. However, here’s where certain tactics come into play if a company does not sign up for the program, they will miss out on things like the following:

  • High-effort engineering engagements
  • Early tech engagement
  • Launch partner status
  • Game bundling
  • Sales rebate programs
  • Social media and PR support
  • Marketing reports
  • Marketing Development Funds (MDF)

And that’s quite a package, Marketing Development Funds, for example, are normally outted to partners for advertising, promotions, exhibits etc and what not. They would be completely cut off such funds, and these likely are substantial budgets alright. So that last bullet is an important one. Next to that if you do not join the program, you can bet as a partner that chances are high you are not on the 'preferred list' anymore, resulting into maybe receiving less GPU stock, if they were not GPP members. All speculation at this point. So basically one word covers all of what has been discovered, Nvidia seeks exclusivity, a bit of a devils deal and dilemma really. If the story is as presented correct, it's not a good development at all, this is a way Nvidia can negatively have an impact on brands like Intel and AMD, and in the long run, less competition means less choice, less innovation, and likely higher prices. So this impacts you as a consumer as well.

One question that also remains is, how new is this really, if at all? The board partners that have had their hands in Nvidia's cookie jar have been pretty much forced to be Nvidia exclusive for years now. It seems that this now would more of an effect on the MSI's, ASUS and Gigabyte's out there. Nvidia has yet to respond to the allegations, but clearly if true and valid, this is stuff is pure politics with monopolistic tendencies, food for layers. Then again, the story might be very one-sided being pushed by certain forces in the industry, perhaps this updated GPP changes very little to nothing for NVidia's partners, much like it has been for years. And also let me throw in one more thing that has been playing in my head while writing this. As a bit of a paradox and food for thoughts; what about the AMD exclusivity with XFX & Sapphire? 

 

 







« Kingdom Come: Deliverance Patch 1.3.1 · NVIDIA’s New GeForce Partner Program Under Criticism · MSI Motherboard with Z390 Chipset Listed in AIDA64 »

74 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


alanm
Senior Member



Posts: 11269
Joined: 2004-05-10

#5526647 Posted on: 03/08/2018 11:37 PM
I dont know the legal implications for Nvidia with their GPP program but gather its entirely voluntary with no restrictions to their partners carrying AMD products (other than name conflicts with Nv products). Pretty sure Nvidia consulted their legal dept on every angle of this program and how it will be implemented. Unless they are stupid enough to expose themselves to law suits or other penalties that may damage them far more than they hope to gain. Lets see what happens down the road.

Pretty funny reading all the comments. All 'heiling' Kyle for his selfless investigative journalism, with so many saying thats why they dont buy Nvidia or are planning to ditch Nvidia. Basically meaning that their GPU choices are ethics based instead of performance based. I wonder how many of these folks had Intel CPUs when Intel was at the height of their monopolistic practices a few years ago. Even funnier was someone blaming Nvidia for this Kyle Bennet Urban Dictionary entry. :D

edit: OK, on closer inspection, it would seem Nv insisting on other brands naming conventions (ie, 'gaming' cards) do not conflict with their own 'gaming' products may be objectionable, but not sure if its anti-trust or not. Again, I'm sure their legal experts have all this covered and they probably should be in the clear but yes, it does seem like a dick move.

alanm
Senior Member



Posts: 11269
Joined: 2004-05-10

#5526652 Posted on: 03/08/2018 11:59 PM
p.s. Just discovered that a lot of AMDs cards have 'gaming' in their model names. OK, now things are becoming clearer that Nvidia is up to no good.

Monchis
Senior Member



Posts: 1303
Joined: 2014-06-15

#5526683 Posted on: 03/09/2018 04:40 AM
It´s no mystery that gamer or gaming branded stuff is selling much more than the non "gaming" branded stuff these days... so nvidia just wants the gaming/gamer labels all for themselves. What a bunch of scumbags.

Spets
Senior Member



Posts: 3239
Joined: 2011-05-10

#5526706 Posted on: 03/09/2018 08:18 AM
Before we go any further, in the effort to be as transparent as possible, we need to let you know that AMD came to us and presented us with "this story." AMD shopped this story with other websites as well.


Maybe AMD should stop relying on defaming the competition and create better products.

KissSh0t
Senior Member



Posts: 11226
Joined: 2011-10-22

#5526711 Posted on: 03/09/2018 08:42 AM
Maybe AMD should stop relying on defaming the competition and create better products.


You're comment is High Quality Bait.



--

Joking aside this sort of news is very off putting.

74 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022