Hitman III: PC graphics perf benchmark review
TeamGroup CX2 1TB SATA3 SSD review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra review
Corsair 5000D PC Chassis Review
NZXT Kraken X63 RGB Review
ASUS Radeon RX 6900 XT STRIX OC LC Review
TerraMaster F5-221 NAS Review
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 NITRO+ review
Corsair HS70 Bluetooth Headset Review
Guru3D.com »
News »
Intel Core i3-10300 and i3-10100 Cinebench Scores Spotted, compared with Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100
Intel Core i3-10300 and i3-10100 Cinebench Scores Spotted, compared with Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100
Yeah, that's four CB20 benchmark scores from four unleased processors. Core i3-10300 and i3-10100 are of course Comet lake, socket LGA1200 processors with 4-cores/8-threads, and SMT hyper-threading).
The i3-10100 is an entry-level part that clocks in at 3.60 GHz and gets a 4.30 GHz boost; the i3-10300 is clocked at 3.70 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost. Both at a 65 W TDP. L3 cache is different for each. the i3-10100 has 6 MB, the i3-10300 has 8 MB. Cinebench R20 scores of the two chips got leaked to the web through CPU-Monkey and then posted at 3DCenter. Check out the results table comparing top last weeks announced (but unreleased Ryzen 3000 Series 3 3100 and 3300X.
That difference is tight/marginal at best alright.
technology | CB20 ST | CB20 MT | source | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ryzen 3 3300X | AMD Zen 2, 4C / 8T, 3.8 / 4.3 GHz, 65W | 491 | 2341 | CPU monkey |
Ryzen 3 3100 | AMD Zen 2, 4C / 8T, 3.6 / 3.9 GHz, 65W | 444 | 2154 | CPU monkey |
Ryzen 5 1500X | AMD Zen 1, 4C / 8T, 3.5 / 3.7 GHz, 65W | 341 | 1811 | CPU monkey |
Core i3-10300 | Intel Comet Lake, 4C / 8T, 3.7 / 4.4 GHz, 65W | 457 | 2330 | CPU monkey |
Core i3-10100 | Intel Comet Lake, 4C / 8T, 3.6 / 4.3 GHz, 65W | 448 | 2284 | CPU monkey |
Core i7-7700K | Intel Kaby Lake, 4C / 8T, 4.2 / 4.5 GHz, 95W | 466 | 2257 | CPU monkey |
« Gigabyte outs AORUS K1 Mechanical Gaming Keyboard · Intel Core i3-10300 and i3-10100 Cinebench Scores Spotted, compared with Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100
· Samsung T7 external SSD without fingerprint scanner spotted »
Intel Core i7-10700K and i5-10600K Benchmarks in Geekbench - 04/20/2020 03:33 PM
You have to wonder if there's anything let to report after Intel actually launches their Comet lake series desktop processors. Today you can add numbers for Core i7-10700K and i5-10600K, which seem ...
Steam Shows Intel Core CPUs Gaining ground on the processor install base over AMD Ryzen - 04/07/2020 08:43 AM
It has been an incredible dynamic few years on the processor front. AMD recaptured processor momentum ever since they released Ryzen processors. I mean just where they are now and where they were four...
10th Gen Intel Comet Lake-H for notebooks specs leak onto the web - 03/31/2020 08:35 AM
Intel will launch its new Intel Comet Lake-H processors for laptops, and a leak occurred on the web, showing all final specifications from twhat seem to be official Intel slides....
Intel Comet Lake successor Rocket Lake to get PCIe Gen 4.0 Support - 03/22/2020 03:04 PM
So the story goes like this, Comet Lake, the pending to be released Intel desktop processors up-top 10 cores, originally had a PCIe Gen4 design, but with signal validation issues, Intel is sticking to...
Intel Comet Lake-S Desktop process pricing starts to leak - 03/10/2020 12:55 PM
Comet lake is the next-gen processor series froM intel for desktop. We've discussed these many times and as it seems, not a day goes by with some sort of leak. Well, today another one, a Dutch etaile...
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 3352
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 3352
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5783103 Posted on: 04/27/2020 07:39 AM
Competition on all of the price segments - isn't that wonderful?
Competition on all of the price segments - isn't that wonderful?
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 2216
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2216
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5783109 Posted on: 04/27/2020 07:53 AM
At lower end, I think having iGPU is more essential. More consumers interested in simple and low cost package.
So while AMD has more power on CPU side, comparing Intel (i3) to AMD APU 3200G/3400G products makes more sense imo.
I'd rather want to see Zen 2 APU from AMD. That combines CPU and GPU performance on a single package.
Yeah. Gamers shouldn't anymore buy new 4-core CPUs. If you aren't a gamer, iGPU might easily be enough.
At lower end, I think having iGPU is more essential. More consumers interested in simple and low cost package.
So while AMD has more power on CPU side, comparing Intel (i3) to AMD APU 3200G/3400G products makes more sense imo.
I'd rather want to see Zen 2 APU from AMD. That combines CPU and GPU performance on a single package.
Yeah. Gamers shouldn't anymore buy new 4-core CPUs. If you aren't a gamer, iGPU might easily be enough.
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 6097
Joined: 2011-01-02
Senior Member
Posts: 6097
Joined: 2011-01-02
#5783113 Posted on: 04/27/2020 08:12 AM
I built 2 PCs with AMD 2200G/3200G APU in them for my family. And 2200G handles casual gaming nicely for 1080p resolution.
Games like Minecraft, Human: Fall Flat and similar games runs without issues with stable frames.
Just feels good to be able to built such PC rig for $300.
Intel been catching up with iGPU performance lately, looking forward to see how it performs and if price is competitive against AMD parts (APU + Mobo).
Yeah. Gamers shouldn't anymore buy new 4-core CPUs. If you aren't a gamer, iGPU might easily be enough.
I built 2 PCs with AMD 2200G/3200G APU in them for my family. And 2200G handles casual gaming nicely for 1080p resolution.
Games like Minecraft, Human: Fall Flat and similar games runs without issues with stable frames.
Just feels good to be able to built such PC rig for $300.
Intel been catching up with iGPU performance lately, looking forward to see how it performs and if price is competitive against AMD parts (APU + Mobo).
icedman
Senior Member
Posts: 1058
Joined: 2013-02-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1058
Joined: 2013-02-22
#5783124 Posted on: 04/27/2020 09:00 AM
It's funny to see an i7 7700k so close in performance to what me and I think most here now would consider to be low end now even though it was 400-450$ processor not too long ago.
It's funny to see an i7 7700k so close in performance to what me and I think most here now would consider to be low end now even though it was 400-450$ processor not too long ago.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Posts: 6097
Joined: 2011-01-02
At lower end, I think having iGPU is more essential. More consumers interested in simple and low cost package.
So while AMD has more power on CPU side, comparing Intel (i3) to AMD APU 3200G/3400G products makes more sense imo.
I'd rather want to see Zen 2 APU from AMD. That combines CPU and GPU performance on a single package.