G.SKILL launches New Ultra Low-Latency DDR4 32GB-Module Kits
G.SKILL is excited to announce an all-new high-capacity, low-latency DDR4-3200 CL14-18-18-38 memory kit specification based on 32 GB modules across the Trident Z RGB, Trident Z Royal, and Trident Z Neo series.
Available in 256 GB (32GBx8), 128 GB (32GBx4), and 64 GB (32GBx2) kit capacities for quad-channel and dual-channel platforms, these new DDR4 memory specifications are built with the latest high-density 16Gb components and provide the perfect mix of extreme performance and high memory capacity.
DDR4-3200 CL14 has always been the ultimate sweet spot for performance since the early days of DDR4 memory, and G.SKILL is now bringing the legendary high-performance efficiency to the latest 32 GB high-capacity DDR4 modules. Designed for the latest HEDT platforms with quad-channel support, the DDR4-3200 CL14-18-18-38 specification with 256 GB (32GBx8) memory kit capacity can be seen validated in the screenshots below with the new Intel Core i9-10900X processor on the ASUS ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE motherboard and the Intel Core i9-10940X processor on the MSI Creator X299 motherboard.
Pushing the Latency Limits of AMD Platforms
Optimized to extract every bit of memory performance out of the latest 3rd Gen AMD Ryzen Threadripper platform, G.SKILL is also bringing the low-latency DDR4-3200 CL14-18-18-38 256 GB (32GBx8) specification to the AMD-compatible Trident Z Neo series. In the following screenshot, this high-efficient kit is validated with the latest AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X processor on the ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME motherboard.
Under the Trident Z Neo series, this new DDR4 memory specification will also be brought onto the AMD X570 platform in kit capacities of 128 GB (32GBx4) and 64 GB (32GBx2). In the screenshot below, the DDR4-3200 CL14-18-18-38 128 GB (32GBx4) memory kit is validated with the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 processor and the ASUS PRIME X570-P motherboard.
Availability & XMP 2.0 Support
These high-capacity and low-latency memory specifications support Intel XMP 2.0 for easy overclocking and will be available via G.SKILL worldwide distribution partners in Q1 2020.
Guru3D 2019 December 13th contest: Win 32GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo 3600 MHz DDR4 - 12/13/2019 09:59 AM
Eight, sixteen, or is -two Gigabytes of DDR4 memory is the magic number for champions? Speaking of champions, are you interested in a 32GB Trident Z Neo DDR4 kit from G.Skill. Optimized for AMD Ryzen...
G.SKILL Announces New High-Performace, Ultra-Capacity DDR4 Memory Kits for HEDT Platforms - 11/25/2019 03:56 PM
G.SKILL is excited to announce a series of high performance quad channel memory kits for the latest Intel X299 and AMD TRX40 high-end desktop (HEDT) platforms....
G.SKILL launches Extreme Low Latency DDR4-4000 CL15 32GB Memory Kits - 10/18/2019 06:00 PM
G.SKILL is releasing an extreme low-latency, high-speed DDR4 memory kit at DDR4-4000 CL15-16-16-36 in a 32 GB (8 GB x4) capacity configuration under the classic Trident Z and the RGB-enabled Trident Z...
Review: G.Skill KM360 Keyboard - 10/17/2019 09:43 AM
The G.Skill brand is known especially for offering DRAM, but they also have SSDs, headsets, mice and even power supplies in their product range. On the 21st of August , they announced a new gaming key...
G.SKILL Releases New DDR4 32GB Module Specs with Memory Kits Up to 256GB - 10/09/2019 02:55 PM
G.Skill is excited to announce a series of high capacity memory kits based on the latest 32GB DDR4 modules, with kits capacity up to DDR4-256GB. ...
Senior Member
Posts: 204
Joined: 2017-09-22
Does the memory clock actually matter that much when you have so many cores? Surely it is cores and amount of memory that matters in these systems?
I can understand it for pifast world records and even perhaps a bit for something like a 4 core gaming system 9900KS perhaps that you do a bit of benching on as well as a side hobby, but if you really need all that RAM does current RAM bog you down on the CL value?
Corsair are doing CL16-18-18-36 already ... does the CL14 really make that much difference? Only if the same price or cheaper I would say. Otherwise it is just a "GHz war" for memory maker it seems to me, or perhaps I am just being cynical.
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2019-12-23
This omega low latency at 14-18-18-36 is achievable on most of 32GB sticks but with tRFC they capable of... huh

Senior Member
Posts: 1011
Joined: 2010-05-12
Does the memory clock actually matter that much when you have so many cores? Surely it is cores and amount of memory that matters in these systems?
I can understand it for pifast world records and even perhaps a bit for something like a 4 core gaming system 9900KS perhaps that you do a bit of benching on as well as a side hobby, but if you really need all that RAM does current RAM bog you down on the CL value?
Corsair are doing CL16-18-18-36 already ... does the CL14 really make that much difference? Only if the same price or cheaper I would say. Otherwise it is just a "GHz war" for memory maker it seems to me, or perhaps I am just being cynical.
I agree with you, this kit seems better than the corsair one, since the lower latency, but unneded.
This is mainly gaming performance and gaming + high capacity is a so restricted audience that as a company i would not bet on it.
The day a gamer and rbg lover wants 64gigs inside his system, those speeds are already outdated.
Senior Member
Posts: 691
Joined: 2004-09-20
well, teamgroup has still 8pack mems, 14-14-14-31@1t 3200Mhz, so...they are fast. And doing 3800@c15, so...
but they 16gb for 130e
Senior Member
Posts: 744
Joined: 2015-05-19
Looks quite interesting, been looking for some nicely balanced high- capacity modules for a gaming-workstation hybrid system.