Fractal Design Define S2 Vision RGB review
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X Review
Zotac GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming Review
Team Group MP34 NVME SSD (512GB) review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Gaming OC review
Anno 1800: PC graphics performance benchmark review
NZXT H500 Overwatch Special Edition review
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Twin Fan 6 GB Review
Corsair Carbide 275Q review
Download: Reflections RTX Technology Demo download
It took a while to be released but you can now try out the Reflections RTX Tech Demo from NVIDIA. The 1.5 GB download is available from our file-mirror.
Download: Atomic Heart RTX Technology Demo - 04/11/2019 04:00 PM
You can now download and tryout the Atomic Heart RTX Tech Demo, this demo showcases DirectX Raytracing reflections and shadows, as well as NVIDIA DLSS. Download...
Download: GeForce 425.31 WHQL driver (Adds Pascal DXR support) - 04/11/2019 03:16 PM
Game Ready Drivers provide the best possible gaming experience for all major new releases, including Virtual Reality games. Prior to a new title launching. This driver among other things, adds DXR to...
Download: MSI Afterburner 4.6.1 Beta 2 - 04/11/2019 11:21 AM
We've just made MSI Afterburner 4.6.1 Beta 2 available for public download. Our popular graphics card tweaking and monitoring utility has been updated updates to provides a number of new features, o...
Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) V18.0.1.0 - 04/04/2019 08:38 AM
Download Display Driver Uninstaller DDU, which has been updated to revision v18.0.1.0. This application is a driver removal utility that can help you completely uninstall AMD/NVIDIA graphics card dri...
Download: Radeon Adrenalin Edition 19.4.1 driver - 04/01/2019 09:08 PM
Download Radeon Software Adrenalin 2019 Edition 19.4.1. This release fixes a number of issues for the AMD Radeon VII and Radeon RX Vega Series among others as well as some game fixes. More info afte...
SharpGame
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 2018-11-27
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 2018-11-27
#5659303 Posted on: 04/12/2019 01:49 AM
Thanks for the links.
Thanks for the links.
XenthorX
Senior Member
Posts: 2324
Joined: 2014-06-17
Senior Member
Posts: 2324
Joined: 2014-06-17
#5659330 Posted on: 04/12/2019 03:54 AM
Appears to be completely framerate locked down. No idea of what would be possible if it was unlocked
Appears to be completely framerate locked down. No idea of what would be possible if it was unlocked
kilyan
Senior Member
Posts: 552
Joined: 2004-03-08
Senior Member
Posts: 552
Joined: 2004-03-08
#5659385 Posted on: 04/12/2019 08:43 AM
15 fps lol on my 1080
15 fps lol on my 1080
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 9095
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 9095
Joined: 2006-02-14
#5659426 Posted on: 04/12/2019 10:25 AM
7-15 fps for me on a 1080 Ti FE with +130 on the core and +570 on the RAM.
I'm disappointed that these demos give you zero controls.
Edit: At 1440p.
7-15 fps for me on a 1080 Ti FE with +130 on the core and +570 on the RAM.
I'm disappointed that these demos give you zero controls.
Edit: At 1440p.
Bogeyx
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 2013-12-03
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 2013-12-03
#5659435 Posted on: 04/12/2019 11:34 AM
For those where the game doesnt start fullscreen or with the right resolution: Disable Windows DPI Scaling
~30fps with 2070 on 1440p
For those where the game doesnt start fullscreen or with the right resolution: Disable Windows DPI Scaling
~30fps with 2070 on 1440p
SharpGame
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 2018-11-27
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 2018-11-27
#5659451 Posted on: 04/12/2019 12:04 PM
On an Asus Strix 1070Ti
On an Asus Strix 1070Ti
Sempaii
Senior Member
Posts: 105
Joined: 2014-10-16
Senior Member
Posts: 105
Joined: 2014-10-16
#5659454 Posted on: 04/12/2019 12:15 PM
On an Asus Strix 1070Ti
Almost as good as when i had a Commendor 64 :p
On an Asus Strix 1070Ti
Almost as good as when i had a Commendor 64 :p
SharpGame
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 2018-11-27
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 2018-11-27
#5659470 Posted on: 04/12/2019 01:08 PM
Stormyandcold
Senior Member
Posts: 5134
Joined: 2003-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 5134
Joined: 2003-09-15
#5659657 Posted on: 04/12/2019 11:12 PM
Works with my GTX1070 and latest driver. Runs like crap, but, it's an interesting look into the demands of "realistic" looking graphics. Gpu+cpu power is only part of the problem, it's obvious that hard drive space requirements would also be huge for a fully-fledged game.
However, it also shows we're really not that many years away from this being potentially mainstream and the accepted standard. If I said 10yrs away, I still think I'm over-estimating.
Works with my GTX1070 and latest driver. Runs like crap, but, it's an interesting look into the demands of "realistic" looking graphics. Gpu+cpu power is only part of the problem, it's obvious that hard drive space requirements would also be huge for a fully-fledged game.
However, it also shows we're really not that many years away from this being potentially mainstream and the accepted standard. If I said 10yrs away, I still think I'm over-estimating.
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 847
Joined: 2014-07-22
Senior Member
Posts: 847
Joined: 2014-07-22
#5659724 Posted on: 04/13/2019 03:18 AM
I'm sorry, but I can't see one frame that would be impossible to mimic 100% with standard rasterizing tech--to look just like it and run at a 3x-4x better frame rate. Lol...10 fps at lowly 1080P--stutter city. People really get carried away with the Chrome look, eh? (You can do chrome effects and reflections that look just as nice with standard rasterizing. The "chrome look" isn't used that much in gaming today because it's such an old, hackneyed effect--done to death in previous years, previous games, movies, etc. Chrome & reflections does *not* = ray tracing. Sigh.) If this scene was actually *ray traced* you'd be lucky to get one frame generated every ten minutes. Instead of hybrid--well, there's no actual "ray tracing" going on, so I guess it's "hybrid rasterizing" (whatever that might be...) designed to mimic a ray-traced output. But that's what rasterizing is, anyway! Ah, leave it to marketeers to foul the environment once again! I predict this will be a very short-lived D3d effect, but we'll see. You know, if nVidia had called this "programmed rasterization" or something along those lines I'd have had no objection whatever. But "real-time ray tracing"...? No such thing! Doesn't exist. "Hybrid rendering" is fine--just leave off any mention of "real-time ray tracing" and all is well. But that's not going to happen, eh?
But, I'll give nVidia props for finally getting out an actual *demo* of something that will run on those $800-$1300 cards! Even if it s only @ 1080P! It's about time, I should think--only about--what--six months late? Better late than never, right, nVidia? (I know that I sound like an old sour puss about this--but there's just something about *false advertising* that has always rubbed me the wrong way! Grrrrrr!)
I'm sorry, but I can't see one frame that would be impossible to mimic 100% with standard rasterizing tech--to look just like it and run at a 3x-4x better frame rate. Lol...10 fps at lowly 1080P--stutter city. People really get carried away with the Chrome look, eh? (You can do chrome effects and reflections that look just as nice with standard rasterizing. The "chrome look" isn't used that much in gaming today because it's such an old, hackneyed effect--done to death in previous years, previous games, movies, etc. Chrome & reflections does *not* = ray tracing. Sigh.) If this scene was actually *ray traced* you'd be lucky to get one frame generated every ten minutes. Instead of hybrid--well, there's no actual "ray tracing" going on, so I guess it's "hybrid rasterizing" (whatever that might be...
) designed to mimic a ray-traced output. But that's what rasterizing is, anyway! Ah, leave it to marketeers to foul the environment once again! I predict this will be a very short-lived D3d effect, but we'll see. You know, if nVidia had called this "programmed rasterization" or something along those lines I'd have had no objection whatever. But "real-time ray tracing"...? No such thing! Doesn't exist. "Hybrid rendering" is fine--just leave off any mention of "real-time ray tracing" and all is well. But that's not going to happen, eh?But, I'll give nVidia props for finally getting out an actual *demo* of something that will run on those $800-$1300 cards! Even if it s only @ 1080P! It's about time, I should think--only about--what--six months late? Better late than never, right, nVidia? (I know that I sound like an old sour puss about this--but there's just something about *false advertising* that has always rubbed me the wrong way! Grrrrrr!)
SharkyUK
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2017-03-20
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2017-03-20
#5660181 Posted on: 04/15/2019 12:45 AM
No need to apologise, I think most tech-savvy people here realise you really haven't got a clue what you are talking about.
I'm sorry,
No need to apologise, I think most tech-savvy people here realise you really haven't got a clue what you are talking about.
mrv2k
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2005-04-11
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2005-04-11
#5660324 Posted on: 04/15/2019 05:59 PM
Solid 48fps on 2080TI/i9-9900k @ 1440p. Seems limited to 48fps.
Solid 48fps on 2080TI/i9-9900k @ 1440p. Seems limited to 48fps.
Caesar
Senior Member
Posts: 481
Joined: 2015-06-18
Senior Member
Posts: 481
Joined: 2015-06-18
#5660334 Posted on: 04/15/2019 06:42 PM
:p
:p
Gomez Addams
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2019-04-15
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2019-04-15
#5660346 Posted on: 04/15/2019 07:44 PM
"The "chrome look" isn't used that much in gaming today because it's such an old, hackneyed effect--done to death in previous years,..."
No, that's not why. The reason why is because they CAN'T do it and look good.
"You know, if nVidia had called this "programmed rasterization" or something along those lines I'd have had no objection whatever. But "real-time ray tracing"...? No such thing! Doesn't exist."
You obviously don't even know what ray tracing is. What nonsense.
"The "chrome look" isn't used that much in gaming today because it's such an old, hackneyed effect--done to death in previous years,..."
No, that's not why. The reason why is because they CAN'T do it and look good.
"You know, if nVidia had called this "programmed rasterization" or something along those lines I'd have had no objection whatever. But "real-time ray tracing"...? No such thing! Doesn't exist."
You obviously don't even know what ray tracing is. What nonsense.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 598
Joined: 2005-11-18
Well its good they finally found a use for there $1,200 cards! o_O