Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
ASUS ROG Thor 1000W Platinum II (1000W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WIFI6E router review
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
ASUS PB278Q 27-Inch LCD Monitor
ASUS is busy in their monitor segment lately. The soon will release another LCD monitor ‘PB278Q’ for the mass market. Adopting a PLS panel, this new 27-inch widescreen monitor provides 2560 x 1440 WQHD resolution, 1000:1 contrast ratio, 300 cd/m2 brightness, 5ms response time and 178/178 degree viewing angles. In addition, it also comes with two built-in 3W stereo speakers and features DVI-D, D-Sub, HDMI and DisplayPort connectors.
The PB278Q will start shipping from October 6th for 59,800 Yen (about $766).
This article has been updated on 3rd of october with more precise specs
Tagged as:
Monitor
INSTG8R
Senior Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: 2005-03-18
Senior Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: 2005-03-18
#4421674 Posted on: 10/01/2012 05:06 PM
I wonder if the popularity of the Catleap and other similar panels has finally woke the monitor manufactures up?
One of those Catleaps wll be my next upgrade when funds permit. Just too juicy not to bite. But good to see the "mainstream" finally twigging to this. They aren't making any efforts to compete cost wise. I get it's a "premium" panel but the Catleaps are getting them from the same sources.
I wonder if the popularity of the Catleap and other similar panels has finally woke the monitor manufactures up?
One of those Catleaps wll be my next upgrade when funds permit. Just too juicy not to bite. But good to see the "mainstream" finally twigging to this. They aren't making any efforts to compete cost wise. I get it's a "premium" panel but the Catleaps are getting them from the same sources.
Virtue
Senior Member
Posts: 828
Joined: 2010-07-27
Senior Member
Posts: 828
Joined: 2010-07-27
#4421747 Posted on: 10/01/2012 06:40 PM
Price is wayyyyyy too high, but it is indeed good to see that we're slowly getting past the "Full HD 1080p" era.
For someone like me from Canada, I'd have to pay taxes on top of that ridiculous high price, which comes down to 880$. You can get a A- 120hz IPS 27" 1440p monitor for 555$ at 120hz.net. Or you can buy two standard catleaps with that money and still have left over money.
Price is wayyyyyy too high, but it is indeed good to see that we're slowly getting past the "Full HD 1080p" era.
For someone like me from Canada, I'd have to pay taxes on top of that ridiculous high price, which comes down to 880$. You can get a A- 120hz IPS 27" 1440p monitor for 555$ at 120hz.net. Or you can buy two standard catleaps with that money and still have left over money.
scoter man1
Senior Member
Posts: 4865
Joined: 2008-12-09
Senior Member
Posts: 4865
Joined: 2008-12-09
#4421779 Posted on: 10/01/2012 07:12 PM
I'd like to see them making higher resolutions like this (and higher) with smaller screen sizes, like in the low 20's. I don't want to have an even more giant monitor, I'd just like to have a crisper monitor.
I'd like to see them making higher resolutions like this (and higher) with smaller screen sizes, like in the low 20's. I don't want to have an even more giant monitor, I'd just like to have a crisper monitor.
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9800
Joined: 2011-09-21
Senior Member
Posts: 9800
Joined: 2011-09-21
#4421963 Posted on: 10/02/2012 12:36 AM
I think apple would have to come off some patents for that to happen
I'd like to see them making higher resolutions like this (and higher) with smaller screen sizes, like in the low 20's. I don't want to have an even more giant monitor, I'd just like to have a crisper monitor.
I think apple would have to come off some patents for that to happen
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 9800
Joined: 2011-09-21
I want it but too much $$$$$$$