Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GamingPro review
Team Group T-Force DarkZα 3600 MHz DDR4 review
Corsair Scimitar Elite RGB gaming mouse review
Cougar 700K Evo keyboard review
Aorus Liquid Cooler 360 review
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X review
Corsair A500 CPU air cooler review
Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GamingPRO review
Lamptron SM436 PCI fan/RGB controller review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora 360 review
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X overclocked to 5.9 GHz on LN2 / DDR4 at 5774 MT/s
Well, one thing is a certainty, there's isn't a lack of news on AMD products lately. A pro-overclocker (Tsaik) subzero cooled a Ryzen 7 3800X with LN2. The 8-core processors was able to reach 5.9 GHz using an MSI motherboard.
The default values for this proc are of course a 3.9 base and 4.5 GHz turbo. Looking at the results the sixth core is clocked at this speed of exactly 5911.3 MHz, using a multiplier of 59 and a bus speed of 100.19 MHz. The screenshots shows a CPU voltage of 1.1 volts but that can't be right though. In other news, the memory also run nicely, at 5774 MHz. He used the Godlike motherboard that we coincidentally reviewed today.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X & Ryzen 9 3900X review with benchmarks leaks out - 07/05/2019 05:39 PM
It is apparently rather hard to keep articles offline, even for some very professional and well funded websites. After yesterday's NAVI leak today the turn goes towards the German-based pcgameshardwa...
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X CineBench R15 OC Performance Posted - 07/01/2019 07:30 AM
While AMD isn't even seeding Ryzen 9 3950X, a CineBench R15 Performance result was posted. The 16-core with 32 threads and 72 MiByte L3-Cache proc is bound to set some records....
AMD Ryzen 9 Packaging Shows Up - 07/01/2019 07:23 AM
AMD is changing its processor-in-a-box retail packaging for the Ryzen 9 series with a more premium design. Retailer PC Part Picker placed a photo of the Ryzen 9 box up-close....
Another AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review/Benchmarks Leaks - 06/26/2019 07:04 AM
A new set benchmarks have leaked onto the web, the Ryzen 5 3600 processor involves the cheapest 199 USD based Ryzen 5 3600. This is the slowest and most affordable SKU that AMD will release with six ...
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 CPU Benchmarks Surface - 06/21/2019 12:11 PM
A set of photos and CPU-Z / Cinebench screenshots have leaked onto the web, the processor involves the cheapest 199 USD based Ryzen 5 3600. This is the slowest and most affordable SKU that AMD will re...
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36982
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36982
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5691356 Posted on: 07/15/2019 06:44 PM
Ah my bad, had 3700X in mind. Fixed.
Thought the 3800X was a 4.5GHz turbo..... might be wrong though
Ah my bad, had 3700X in mind. Fixed.
Jagman
Senior Member
Posts: 2228
Joined: 2005-03-26
Senior Member
Posts: 2228
Joined: 2005-03-26
#5691357 Posted on: 07/15/2019 06:46 PM
On the ball as always HH
On the ball as always HH
ruthan
Senior Member
Posts: 292
Joined: 2016-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 292
Joined: 2016-05-24
#5691409 Posted on: 07/15/2019 10:51 PM
Is this good? deBauer got Core i9 9900K somewhere around 7.5 GHz..
https://valid.x86.fr/records.php
Is this good? deBauer got Core i9 9900K somewhere around 7.5 GHz..
https://valid.x86.fr/records.php
DW75
Senior Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: 2012-08-19
Senior Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: 2012-08-19
#5691413 Posted on: 07/15/2019 11:22 PM
The first official review for the R7 3800X is up now, over at Tom's Hardware.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-3800x-review,6226.html
All tests were performed with RAM at 2933 though, which is strange.
The first official review for the R7 3800X is up now, over at Tom's Hardware.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-3800x-review,6226.html
All tests were performed with RAM at 2933 though, which is strange.
Borys
Member
Posts: 83
Joined: 2015-02-19
Member
Posts: 83
Joined: 2015-02-19
#5691458 Posted on: 07/16/2019 01:46 AM
LN2 is completely IRRELEVANT...
LN2 is completely IRRELEVANT...
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: 2018-03-21
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: 2018-03-21
#5691459 Posted on: 07/16/2019 01:49 AM
The first official review for the R7 3800X is up now, over at Tom's Hardware.
All tests were performed with RAM at 2933 though, which is strange.
Where'd you read that bit about the ram?
The first official review for the R7 3800X is up now, over at Tom's Hardware.
All tests were performed with RAM at 2933 though, which is strange.
Where'd you read that bit about the ram?
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 7746
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 7746
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5691465 Posted on: 07/16/2019 02:28 AM
So don't come into a post/article about LN2 then and leave people who are interested and intrigued by basically ultimate stress testing a CPU have their fun.
No one forced you to come into this thread and read or even write your comment, just as no one forces me to go read articles about sports, hence why i don't go into forum threads and post how irrelevant sports are.
LN2 is completely IRRELEVANT...
So don't come into a post/article about LN2 then and leave people who are interested and intrigued by basically ultimate stress testing a CPU have their fun.
No one forced you to come into this thread and read or even write your comment, just as no one forces me to go read articles about sports, hence why i don't go into forum threads and post how irrelevant sports are.
moo100times
Senior Member
Posts: 133
Joined: 2012-06-24
Senior Member
Posts: 133
Joined: 2012-06-24
#5691509 Posted on: 07/16/2019 08:33 AM
The first official review for the R7 3800X is up now, over at Tom's Hardware.
All tests were performed with RAM at 2933 though, which is strange.
I think that was for ryzen gen 2 (ryzen+), not ryzen 2
The first official review for the R7 3800X is up now, over at Tom's Hardware.
All tests were performed with RAM at 2933 though, which is strange.
I think that was for ryzen gen 2 (ryzen+), not ryzen 2
slyphnier
Senior Member
Posts: 703
Joined: 2009-11-30
Senior Member
Posts: 703
Joined: 2009-11-30
#5691583 Posted on: 07/16/2019 02:13 PM
OOT but kinda funny someone like saying forum post only for "same-interest-only"
cmon this forum, people free to post their comment, irrelevant or not its their comment
rather those commenting people comment is the one that OOT, no?
for OC based test-review i read so far seems zen2 pretty limited, well cant expect single product to have everything best, nonetheless it still good cpu
wonder if its TSMC process or like ASIC quality that influence chip OC capability ?
OOT but kinda funny someone like saying forum post only for "same-interest-only"
cmon this forum, people free to post their comment, irrelevant or not its their comment
rather those commenting people comment is the one that OOT, no?
for OC based test-review i read so far seems zen2 pretty limited, well cant expect single product to have everything best, nonetheless it still good cpu
wonder if its TSMC process or like ASIC quality that influence chip OC capability ?
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4698
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4698
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5691588 Posted on: 07/16/2019 02:26 PM
Is this good? deBauer got Core i9 9900K somewhere around 7.5 GHz..
https://valid.x86.fr/records.php
Considering how pretty much everyone is stuck at 4.2GHz with more practical coolers, yes, 5.9 is actually good. Not great, but good. The 7.5 on the 9900K is great, but, it's not that interesting anymore. Everyone knows Intel can OC high, especially if you've got an especially good chip. Nobody is surprised about 7.5, because at this point it's expected. Zen2, on the other hand, is fresh, and is known to be mediocre at OC'ing. So, seeing something like 5.9, although not impressive, piques interest.
OOT but kinda funny someone like saying forum post only for "same-interest-only"
cmon this forum, people free to post their comment, irrelevant or not its their comment
rather those commenting people comment is the one that OOT, no?
There's actually quite a lot of restrictions on what you're allowed to comment here, and as far as I'm concerned, they're all justified. Although Borys wasn't being un-tactful (at least not IMO), the comment was still being needlessly dismissive. So, Aura89 has a valid point: going out of your way to state how something doesn't interest you is unnecessary.
That's like a vegetarian walking into a burger joint saying "I'm not going to order anything". Ok... then get out... You're free to not want to eat burgers, but what do you hope to accomplish by going there and make everyone know you're not interested in the food?
EDIT:
IMO, the best thing about a comments section is to have a discussion. Explicitly showing disinterest is heading in the opposite direction. And yes, I do see the irony in this context.
Is this good? deBauer got Core i9 9900K somewhere around 7.5 GHz..
https://valid.x86.fr/records.php
Considering how pretty much everyone is stuck at 4.2GHz with more practical coolers, yes, 5.9 is actually good. Not great, but good. The 7.5 on the 9900K is great, but, it's not that interesting anymore. Everyone knows Intel can OC high, especially if you've got an especially good chip. Nobody is surprised about 7.5, because at this point it's expected. Zen2, on the other hand, is fresh, and is known to be mediocre at OC'ing. So, seeing something like 5.9, although not impressive, piques interest.
OOT but kinda funny someone like saying forum post only for "same-interest-only"
cmon this forum, people free to post their comment, irrelevant or not its their comment
rather those commenting people comment is the one that OOT, no?
There's actually quite a lot of restrictions on what you're allowed to comment here, and as far as I'm concerned, they're all justified. Although Borys wasn't being un-tactful (at least not IMO), the comment was still being needlessly dismissive. So, Aura89 has a valid point: going out of your way to state how something doesn't interest you is unnecessary.
That's like a vegetarian walking into a burger joint saying "I'm not going to order anything". Ok... then get out... You're free to not want to eat burgers, but what do you hope to accomplish by going there and make everyone know you're not interested in the food?
EDIT:
IMO, the best thing about a comments section is to have a discussion. Explicitly showing disinterest is heading in the opposite direction. And yes, I do see the irony in this context.
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 7746
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 7746
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5691629 Posted on: 07/16/2019 05:11 PM
OOT but kinda funny someone like saying forum post only for "same-interest-only"
cmon this forum, people free to post their comment, irrelevant or not its their comment
rather those commenting people comment is the one that OOT, no?
So if someone came into every forum post/article that you are interested in with the sole purpose of saying this shouldn't be here as it's "irrelevant", you're saying that's valid discussion? You're saying you'd be okay with people actively trying to get rid of something you find interesting, all because it doesn't interest them?
Right.......the articles/forum posts don't effect their ability to read the articles they do find interesting, so the only thing that is irrelevant, is their posts against things they were never forced to read.
LN2 doesn't interest me that much, it's slightly interesting, but not extremely, so i read the article and see what it has to offer. But people coming into an ELECTRONIC-BASED FORUM trying to cater it to their specific needs and disregard others, that's a problem.
I couldn't care less that a British bank places computer pioneer Alan Turing on a £50 bill, as has been posted in the hyperlinked text i just put down in this very forum, it's of no interest to me, but again do you see me going there just to tell the forum, or Hilbert, that this is of no interest, and should not be posted here? No. It's his forum he can do as he likes and if people fine it interesting, great! I'm glad for them, my interest or disinterest should not try and halt others interests.
OOT but kinda funny someone like saying forum post only for "same-interest-only"
cmon this forum, people free to post their comment, irrelevant or not its their comment
rather those commenting people comment is the one that OOT, no?
So if someone came into every forum post/article that you are interested in with the sole purpose of saying this shouldn't be here as it's "irrelevant", you're saying that's valid discussion? You're saying you'd be okay with people actively trying to get rid of something you find interesting, all because it doesn't interest them?
Right.......the articles/forum posts don't effect their ability to read the articles they do find interesting, so the only thing that is irrelevant, is their posts against things they were never forced to read.
LN2 doesn't interest me that much, it's slightly interesting, but not extremely, so i read the article and see what it has to offer. But people coming into an ELECTRONIC-BASED FORUM trying to cater it to their specific needs and disregard others, that's a problem.
I couldn't care less that a British bank places computer pioneer Alan Turing on a £50 bill, as has been posted in the hyperlinked text i just put down in this very forum, it's of no interest to me, but again do you see me going there just to tell the forum, or Hilbert, that this is of no interest, and should not be posted here? No. It's his forum he can do as he likes and if people fine it interesting, great! I'm glad for them, my interest or disinterest should not try and halt others interests.
TheDeeGee
Senior Member
Posts: 6331
Joined: 2010-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 6331
Joined: 2010-08-28
#5691632 Posted on: 07/16/2019 05:38 PM
The first official review for the R7 3800X is up now, over at Tom's Hardware.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-3800x-review,6226.html
All tests were performed with RAM at 2933 though, which is strange.
Changing my wishlist from 3800X to 3700X
The first official review for the R7 3800X is up now, over at Tom's Hardware.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-3800x-review,6226.html
All tests were performed with RAM at 2933 though, which is strange.
Changing my wishlist from 3800X to 3700X
Jagman
Senior Member
Posts: 2228
Joined: 2005-03-26
Senior Member
Posts: 2228
Joined: 2005-03-26
#5691701 Posted on: 07/16/2019 10:10 PM
^ Not surprised by your choice. The 3800X would have made more sense if it could have done 4.7GHz single core boost out of the box.
^ Not surprised by your choice. The 3800X would have made more sense if it could have done 4.7GHz single core boost out of the box.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2228
Joined: 2005-03-26
Thought the 3800X was a 4.5GHz turbo..... might be wrong though
Just think, with the FSB at 102MHz it would have done 6GHz single core, oh well nevermind