AMD Ryzen 7 3700X & Ryzen 9 3900X review with benchmarks leaks out

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/05/2019 06:39 PM | source: wccftech | 275 comment(s)

It is apparently rather hard to keep articles offline, even for some very professional and well funded websites. After yesterday's NAVI leak in Poland today the turn goes towards the Germany based pcgameshardware, who had a full review of the Ryzen 7 3700X & Ryzen 9 3900X online.

As the saying goes, if something is online it always will stay online. Minutes after the leak occurred, the entire content got captured, collected and re-posted at imgguru with a full copy of the writeup and then moved into reddit. From there onwards, the article content has been spreading like wildfire on the web. The results you'll find anywhere and everywhere, so in that state of mind, we might as well post a news item on this happening as well. pcgameshardware.de, a well respected Germany based website posted a full set of benchmarks on Ryzen 7 3700X & Ryzen 9 3900X. Not just benchmarks, also they are showing that the power consumption of both tested processors is lower than a 9900K. The guys tested the procs on an X570 motherboard (ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII HERO) with 16 GB of DDR4 Ram, the setup got accompanied by a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. Below you can see the benchmarks that leaked out and if you click the link above you can see the entire article (albeit you'd need to be able to read German), but yeah .. that's including workload- and game benchmarks.

Related Stories

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X CineBench R15 OC Performance Posted - 07/01/2019 08:30 AM
While AMD isn't even seeding Ryzen 9 3950X, a CineBench R15 Performance result was posted. The 16-core with 32 threads and 72 MiByte L3-Cache proc is bound to set some records....

AMD Ryzen 9 Packaging Shows Up - 07/01/2019 08:23 AM
AMD is changing its processor-in-a-box retail packaging for the Ryzen 9 series with a more premium design. Retailer PC Part Picker placed a photo of the Ryzen 9 box up-close....

Another AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review/Benchmarks Leaks - 06/26/2019 08:04 AM
A new set benchmarks have leaked onto the web, the Ryzen 5 3600 processor involves the cheapest 199 USD based Ryzen 5 3600. This is the slowest and most affordable SKU that AMD will release with six ...

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 CPU Benchmarks Surface - 06/21/2019 01:11 PM
A set of photos and CPU-Z / Cinebench screenshots have leaked onto the web, the processor involves the cheapest 199 USD based Ryzen 5 3600. This is the slowest and most affordable SKU that AMD will re...

Intel Might Drop Desktop processor Prices by 15% To Fight off AMD Ryzen 3000 - 06/21/2019 12:46 PM
Processors, the fun thing with the competition is that it has an effect on development rates and sure money. AMD soon will release Ryzen series 3000 and guess what? Intel is lowering prices on their p...

19 pages 1 2 3 4 > »

HWgeek
Senior Member

Posts: 419
Joined: 2005-04-04

#5687541 Posted on: 07/05/2019 06:52 PM

Look at 3900X and think about 3950X, OMG!

Alessio1989
Senior Member

Posts: 1299
Joined: 2015-06-11

#5687542 Posted on: 07/05/2019 06:53 PM

People still play at 1280*720 on desktop PCs?

Strange Times
Senior Member

Posts: 169
Joined: 2018-08-05

#5687543 Posted on: 07/05/2019 06:53 PM

wow 4 years have passed and they still cant outperform skylake in games...

Witcher29
Senior Member

Posts: 1069
Joined: 2015-06-02

#5687544 Posted on: 07/05/2019 06:53 PM

underwelming performance amd what are u doing ?

Strange Times
Senior Member

Posts: 169
Joined: 2018-08-05

#5687545 Posted on: 07/05/2019 06:54 PM

also hyped for ice lake

fry178
Senior Member

Posts: 1041
Joined: 2012-04-30

#5687547 Posted on: 07/05/2019 06:57 PM

wow 4 years have passed and they still cant outperform skylake in games...

Lol, you wanna tell me your gaming at 720p with a ~1500$ rig?
Right.

angelgraves13
Senior Member

Posts: 1178
Joined: 2014-10-11

#5687548 Posted on: 07/05/2019 06:58 PM

Game at 1440p or higher or you’re just wasting your money.

I understand this is to show CPU bottleneck but what percentage of people game at anything higher than 60 FPS?

Difference between them is small. Very small. Few FPS.

fry178
Senior Member

Posts: 1041
Joined: 2012-04-30

#5687550 Posted on: 07/05/2019 06:59 PM

And even if, its usually NOT at 720p.
At least when i look at games that are newer like siege/bf/cod and not some 100y old cs stuff

angelgraves13
Senior Member

Posts: 1178
Joined: 2014-10-11

#5687551 Posted on: 07/05/2019 07:01 PM

I think new games will favor Ryzen over Intel anyway.

Intel is pretty much dead in the water.

cryohellinc
Senior Member

Posts: 2490
Joined: 2014-10-20

#5687552 Posted on: 07/05/2019 07:01 PM

underwelming performance amd what are u doing ?

They are doing very well.

Alessio1989
Senior Member

Posts: 1299
Joined: 2015-06-11

#5687553 Posted on: 07/05/2019 07:03 PM

I think new games will favor Ryzen over Intel anyway.

Intel is pretty much dead in the water.
Just look at AC:Origins... Most of games are tuned for 4 to 8 concurrent high priority threads..

Strange Times
Senior Member

Posts: 169
Joined: 2018-08-05

#5687555 Posted on: 07/05/2019 07:06 PM

Lol, you wanna tell me your gaming at 720p with a ~1500$ rig?
Right.
in esports titles every fps matters so partially yes

EDK-Rise
Member

Posts: 25
Joined: 2019-02-28

#5687557 Posted on: 07/05/2019 07:10 PM

LOL, another hype is over!

AMD just make beautiful slideshow!

JamesSneed
Senior Member

Posts: 546
Joined: 2017-02-14

#5687558 Posted on: 07/05/2019 07:10 PM

I think new games will favor Ryzen over Intel anyway.

Intel is pretty much dead in the water.

Newer AAA games are using more threads so that ends up favoring AMD. From a CPU perspective it's obvious the 9900K is still pretty damn good only thing wrong with it is its price. However what we don't see here is the 3800x which is AMD's 9900K competitor as it has a little higher base clock than the 3700x and 3900x. I think you are going way overboard saying Intel is dead in the water. I have a 1800x and it's been lovely and may even upgrade it to a 3800x but you are going way to far off the fanboy ledge.

Aura89
Senior Member

Posts: 7482
Joined: 2008-07-31

#5687562 Posted on: 07/05/2019 07:14 PM

People still play at 1280*720 on desktop PCs?

Mostly no, but running games at a lower resolution shows, potentially, the "raw" gap between CPUs, specifically in games. Hence why when run in 4K, you see mostly no difference in any modern CPU no matter your setup, with rare exceptions.

This shows that Intel is still ahead in many ways for gaming, but that AMD has come considerably closer. But more over, the fact they used 720p makes me very interested to see 1080p results, as that's typically what people who are just gung-ho about Intels FPS performance are interested in, it looks like the gap will be pretty dang close, whereas for everything else due to including multithreading and more cores for the cost, you'll get a better overall performing PC.

But i'm sure there's going to be the people who state "SEE! Intel still best! Suck it AMD!" nonsense.

Oh wait, there already is...