Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review

New Downloads
ClockTuner for Ryzen (CTR) v2.0 RC5 Download
GeForce 461.81 hotfix driver download
SiSoft Sandra 20/21 download v31.12
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9316
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5644 beta
FurMark Download v1.25
MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Final Stable Download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.7
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.0 Final
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download


New Forum Topics
WDDM 3.0 / 465.42 EU Rules that Microsoft can Purchase Bethesda 3080 tuf OC ed. Same stutter in apex once/twice a game (w/frametimegraph) AMD confirms that Resident Evil Village will have Ray Tracing support on PC Question about data corruption on mechanical hard drive SK Hynix Fires Up Volume Production of 18-Gigabyte LPDDR5 Mobile DRAM Chips Review scores different between ASUS and Gigabyte x570 boards. ClockTuner for Ryzen (CTR) - and introduction guide and download AMD Memory Tweak - Read/Modify Timings on the fly! New Upcoming ATI/AMD GPU's Thread: Leaks, Hopes & Aftermarket GPU's




Guru3D.com » News » AMD Radeon R7-260X R9-270X and R9-280X reference review

AMD Radeon R7-260X R9-270X and R9-280X reference review

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 10/09/2013 10:03 AM | source: | 71 comment(s)
AMD Radeon R7-260X R9-270X and R9-280X reference review

In this review we will test the new AMD Radeon R7-260X, R9-270X and R9-280X. Follow us into this review where we'll look at temperatures, noise, performance, frame latency and we'll even give Ultra High Definition gaming a go with the hottest game titles on the globe.

You can read the entire review right here.







« Gigabyte Radeon R9-280X WindForce OC review · AMD Radeon R7-260X R9-270X and R9-280X reference review · NEC 27-Inch Color Accurate Display Built on GB-R LED Backlight »

Related Stories

AMD Radeon R9 and R7 graphics cards - 10/07/2013 07:56 AM
Over at the Australian ARN website they exposed many AMD Radeon R9 and R7 graphics cards. The two ranges of graphics cards have been designed to run UltraHD (3840x2160) displays, with support for non...

AMD Radeon R9 290X GPU leaks through Asian website - 09/23/2013 05:10 PM
We are not that far away from a product release from AMD's launch of the AMD's Hawaii GPU, some site leaked pictures and benchmarks. If the photos published by DG's Nerdy Story web-site are to be ...

DICE leaks picture of AMD Radeon R9 290X Hawaii GPU - 09/23/2013 05:00 PM
Intesrting, Johan Andersson from DICE revealed a picture of AMD's Radeon R9 290X "Hawaii" GPU on Twitter! Other then that there's nothing much to report really. Interesting source though...

HIS exposes new AMD Radeon GPU names - 09/17/2013 07:36 AM
A big whoops from HIS technology today as they by accident exposed the naming of AMD's upcoming graphics cards. They are pretty much as expected and rumored. The R9 has a R9 280X graphics card which...

AMD Radeon Graphics Presents The Fixer Part 2 - 08/24/2013 06:38 PM
Perhaps you had a peek at the first one, but AMD just spread the second video as a pun against NVIDIA, we take no credit here. Make of it what you want, and I'll check the comments in the morning :)...


15 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Raiga
Senior Member



Posts: 1099
Joined: 2010-11-05

#4671390 Posted on: 10/08/2013 06:06 AM
There is no difference between R9 280x and 7970.

sverek
Senior Member



Posts: 6074
Joined: 2011-01-02

#4671395 Posted on: 10/08/2013 06:19 AM
There is no difference between R9 280x and 7970.

Reread article. There is difference and optimizations.

I can't complain about 280x, its very nice card for its price as 7970. Now we can pick cheaper 7970 or slightly faster 280x for affordable price.

Looking forward for 290x!

Thanks for review!

WhiteLightning
Moderator



Posts: 28806
Joined: 2007-09-19

#4671397 Posted on: 10/08/2013 06:21 AM
has a better fan (lower dba whilst lower temperature) , very nice at this price!

i read on another review on tweakers that the driver is whining if there is no CFX bridge connected. they were also getting poor performance in eyefinity. So it needs a driver update!

Apparantly also PCIE-3 is also needed for this bridgeless technology due to the bandwidth. (but previous cards with pcie-3 support are also supported it seems)

Solfaur
Senior Member



Posts: 7461
Joined: 2005-08-10

#4671405 Posted on: 10/08/2013 06:46 AM
Nice review, though a bit lame that all of them are refreshes of the last generation. From what I've seen in those charts I suspect the 290X to be between a Titan and a 780 in performance, what I really care about is the price though. All the cards in this review have good prices, I wonder if they can keep that up with 290/290X.

drac
Senior Member



Posts: 1758
Joined: 2003-10-27

#4671412 Posted on: 10/08/2013 07:03 AM
Apparantly also PCIE-3 is also needed for this bridgeless technology due to the bandwidth. (but previous cards with pcie-3 support are also supported it seems)


"Especially with standards like PCI-E Gen 3.0 there's plenty of bandwidth there, but even at Gen 2.0, it really isn't an issue"


3.0 is in fact not required. Also what I gather from that is whether you are using PCI 2.0 or 3.0, the performance difference will be very minimal with a 2x xfire setup.

Might be reading into things a bit much... but I haven't seen any info to disprove this...

15 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021