Deepcool CG560 chassis review
Fractal Design Torrent Black RGB TG review
Core i9 12900K DDR4 3600 vs DDR5 5200 performance review
Corsair H150i Elite LCD review
Seasonic Syncro Q704 chassis + Connect PSU review
Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 860W PSU Review
Crucial P5 Plus PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Fractal Design Lumen S28 RGB review (LCS)
WD Red SN700 NVMe SSD review
Core i9 12900K processor review
AMD Radeon R7-260X R9-270X and R9-280X reference review
In this review we will test the new AMD Radeon R7-260X, R9-270X and R9-280X. Follow us into this review where we'll look at temperatures, noise, performance, frame latency and we'll even give Ultra High Definition gaming a go with the hottest game titles on the globe.
You can read the entire review right here.
AMD Radeon R9 and R7 graphics cards - 10/07/2013 08:56 AM
Over at the Australian ARN website they exposed many AMD Radeon R9 and R7 graphics cards. The two ranges of graphics cards have been designed to run UltraHD (3840x2160) displays, with support for non...
AMD Radeon R9 290X GPU leaks through Asian website - 09/23/2013 06:10 PM
We are not that far away from a product release from AMD's launch of the AMD's Hawaii GPU, some site leaked pictures and benchmarks. If the photos published by DG's Nerdy Story web-site are to be ...
DICE leaks picture of AMD Radeon R9 290X Hawaii GPU - 09/23/2013 06:00 PM
Intesrting, Johan Andersson from DICE revealed a picture of AMD's Radeon R9 290X "Hawaii" GPU on Twitter! Other then that there's nothing much to report really. Interesting source though...
HIS exposes new AMD Radeon GPU names - 09/17/2013 08:36 AM
A big whoops from HIS technology today as they by accident exposed the naming of AMD's upcoming graphics cards. They are pretty much as expected and rumored. The R9 has a R9 280X graphics card which...
AMD Radeon Graphics Presents The Fixer Part 2 - 08/24/2013 07:38 PM
Perhaps you had a peek at the first one, but AMD just spread the second video as a pun against NVIDIA, we take no credit here. Make of it what you want, and I'll check the comments in the morning :)...
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 6073
Joined: 2011-01-02
Senior Member
Posts: 6073
Joined: 2011-01-02
#4671395 Posted on: 10/08/2013 07:19 AM
Reread article. There is difference and optimizations.
I can't complain about 280x, its very nice card for its price as 7970. Now we can pick cheaper 7970 or slightly faster 280x for affordable price.
Looking forward for 290x!
Thanks for review!
There is no difference between R9 280x and 7970.
Reread article. There is difference and optimizations.
I can't complain about 280x, its very nice card for its price as 7970. Now we can pick cheaper 7970 or slightly faster 280x for affordable price.
Looking forward for 290x!
Thanks for review!
WhiteLightning
Moderator
Posts: 29171
Joined: 2007-09-19
Moderator
Posts: 29171
Joined: 2007-09-19
#4671397 Posted on: 10/08/2013 07:21 AM
has a better fan (lower dba whilst lower temperature) , very nice at this price!
i read on another review on tweakers that the driver is whining if there is no CFX bridge connected. they were also getting poor performance in eyefinity. So it needs a driver update!
Apparantly also PCIE-3 is also needed for this bridgeless technology due to the bandwidth. (but previous cards with pcie-3 support are also supported it seems)
has a better fan (lower dba whilst lower temperature) , very nice at this price!
i read on another review on tweakers that the driver is whining if there is no CFX bridge connected. they were also getting poor performance in eyefinity. So it needs a driver update!
Apparantly also PCIE-3 is also needed for this bridgeless technology due to the bandwidth. (but previous cards with pcie-3 support are also supported it seems)
Solfaur
Senior Member
Posts: 7609
Joined: 2005-08-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7609
Joined: 2005-08-10
#4671405 Posted on: 10/08/2013 07:46 AM
Nice review, though a bit lame that all of them are refreshes of the last generation. From what I've seen in those charts I suspect the 290X to be between a Titan and a 780 in performance, what I really care about is the price though. All the cards in this review have good prices, I wonder if they can keep that up with 290/290X.
Nice review, though a bit lame that all of them are refreshes of the last generation. From what I've seen in those charts I suspect the 290X to be between a Titan and a 780 in performance, what I really care about is the price though. All the cards in this review have good prices, I wonder if they can keep that up with 290/290X.
drac
Senior Member
Posts: 1768
Joined: 2003-10-27
Senior Member
Posts: 1768
Joined: 2003-10-27
#4671412 Posted on: 10/08/2013 08:03 AM
"Especially with standards like PCI-E Gen 3.0 there's plenty of bandwidth there, but even at Gen 2.0, it really isn't an issue"
3.0 is in fact not required. Also what I gather from that is whether you are using PCI 2.0 or 3.0, the performance difference will be very minimal with a 2x xfire setup.
Might be reading into things a bit much... but I haven't seen any info to disprove this...
Apparantly also PCIE-3 is also needed for this bridgeless technology due to the bandwidth. (but previous cards with pcie-3 support are also supported it seems)
"Especially with standards like PCI-E Gen 3.0 there's plenty of bandwidth there, but even at Gen 2.0, it really isn't an issue"
3.0 is in fact not required. Also what I gather from that is whether you are using PCI 2.0 or 3.0, the performance difference will be very minimal with a 2x xfire setup.
Might be reading into things a bit much... but I haven't seen any info to disprove this...
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1099
Joined: 2010-11-05
There is no difference between R9 280x and 7970.