ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AC2900 Gaming Router review
Asustor Nimbustor 4 (AS5304T) NAS Review
Promo: VIP-SCDKey Games and Windows 10 / Office
be quiet! Dark Rock SLIM review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming OC review
Edifier G4 Pro Headset review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Cooler Master SK621 Compact keyboard review
AMD Athlon 220GE and 240GE review
Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 3200 MHz 2x8 GB review
GeForce 388.59 WHQL driver download
on: 12/08/2017 10:42 AM [ 107 comment(s) ]
Advertisement
Download the Nvidia GeForce 388.59 WHQL driver as released by NVIDIA. This new release adds an optimal gaming experience for Fallout 4 VR as well as adding support for NVIDIA Titan V.
We have a discussion thread open on this driver here.
R388.59 (r388_43-11) / 23.21.13.8859 (12-5-2017)
GeForce 10 Series
NVIDIA TITAN V, NVIDIA TITAN Xp, NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal), GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, GeForce GTX 1070, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce 900 Series
GeForce GTX TITAN X, GeForce GTX 980 Ti, GeForce GTX 980, GeForce GTX 970, GeForce GTX 960, GeForce GTX 950
GeForce 700 Series
GeForce GTX TITAN Z, GeForce GTX TITAN Black, GeForce GTX TITAN, GeForce GTX 780 Ti, GeForce GTX 780, GeForce GTX 770, GeForce GTX 760, GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM), GeForce GTX 750 Ti, GeForce GTX 750, GeForce GTX 745, GeForce GT 740, GeForce GT 730, GeForce GT 720, GeForce GT 710, GeForce GT 705
GeForce 600 Series
GeForce GTX 690, GeForce GTX 680, GeForce GTX 670, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, GeForce GTX 660, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST, GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 650, GeForce GTX 645, GeForce GT 645, GeForce GT 640, GeForce GT 635, GeForce GT 630, GeForce GT 620, GeForce GT 610, GeForce 605
GeForce 500 Series
GeForce GTX 590, GeForce GTX 580, GeForce GTX 570, GeForce GTX 560 Ti, GeForce GTX 560 SE, GeForce GTX 560, GeForce GTX 555, GeForce GTX 550 Ti, GeForce GT 545, GeForce GT 530, GeForce GT 520, GeForce 510
GeForce 400 Series
GeForce GTX 480, GeForce GTX 470, GeForce GTX 465, GeForce GTX 460 SE v2, GeForce GTX 460 SE, GeForce GTX 460, GeForce GTS 450, GeForce GT 440, GeForce GT 430, GeForce GT 420
Have you read our Star Wars TITAN Xp Collector Edition review already?
5 pages 1 2 3 4 5
peppercute
Senior Member
Posts: 425
Joined: 2010-12-30
Senior Member
Posts: 425
Joined: 2010-12-30
#5498979 Posted on: 12/08/2017 06:51 AM
R388.59 (r388_43-11) / 23.21.13.8859 (12-5-2017)
R388.59 (r388_43-11) / 23.21.13.8859 (12-5-2017)
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 2412
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 2412
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5498999 Posted on: 12/08/2017 08:56 AM
Great stuff, thanks guys, will check after work.
Great stuff, thanks guys, will check after work.
Susahamat
Senior Member
Posts: 310
Joined: 2017-02-17
Senior Member
Posts: 310
Joined: 2017-02-17
#5499021 Posted on: 12/08/2017 10:16 AM
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 2412
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 2412
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5499044 Posted on: 12/08/2017 10:59 AM
Hahaha hes BACK!
Hahaha hes BACK!
Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 830
Joined: 2013-01-11
Senior Member
Posts: 830
Joined: 2013-01-11
#5499045 Posted on: 12/08/2017 11:00 AM
http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/geforce-388-59-whql-driver-download.html
Titan V is an AI card costing $3000 though.
They say .62 but I see only .59.
I want to see some game benchmarks with the Titan V Why GF drivers if it is a AI card. Better AI in games?
http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/geforce-388-59-whql-driver-download.html
Titan V is an AI card costing $3000 though.
They say .62 but I see only .59.
I want to see some game benchmarks with the Titan V Why GF drivers if it is a AI card. Better AI in games?
CrazyBaldhead
Senior Member
Posts: 299
Joined: 2010-10-02
Senior Member
Posts: 299
Joined: 2010-10-02
#5499052 Posted on: 12/08/2017 11:34 AM
Thanks for the cringe.
I want to see some game benchmarks with the Titan V Why GF drivers if it is a AI card. Better AI in games?
Thanks for the cringe.
UZ7
Senior Member
Posts: 5461
Joined: 2003-04-26
Senior Member
Posts: 5461
Joined: 2003-04-26
#5499055 Posted on: 12/08/2017 11:42 AM
It goes by the trend it always has...
Titan -> xx80 / 70 / 60 / 50 etc... -> xx80Ti
Titan (X) release -> 1080 / 70 / 60 /50 etc... -> 1080 Ti release (affordable Titan)... now heres where the fun starts.. they have the Titan Xp.. and the 1070Ti (because of Vega)... so a lot of variations but mostly an introduction
so if it goes by the trend..
Titan V -> 2080? / 70 / 60 / 50? or will be be 1180/1170 etc..
So pretty much they're just introducing architecture.. sure its not "made" for gaming but some people will buy it and try to use it for that purpose.. same thing with the Titan line "$1,000" on release.. not really made for "gaming" then they advertise Titan Xp for VR lol..
I want to see some game benchmarks with the Titan V Why GF drivers if it is a AI card. Better AI in games?
It goes by the trend it always has...
Titan -> xx80 / 70 / 60 / 50 etc... -> xx80Ti
Titan (X) release -> 1080 / 70 / 60 /50 etc... -> 1080 Ti release (affordable Titan)... now heres where the fun starts.. they have the Titan Xp.. and the 1070Ti (because of Vega)... so a lot of variations but mostly an introduction
so if it goes by the trend..
Titan V -> 2080? / 70 / 60 / 50? or will be be 1180/1170 etc..
So pretty much they're just introducing architecture.. sure its not "made" for gaming but some people will buy it and try to use it for that purpose.. same thing with the Titan line "$1,000" on release.. not really made for "gaming" then they advertise Titan Xp for VR lol..
Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 830
Joined: 2013-01-11
Senior Member
Posts: 830
Joined: 2013-01-11
#5499065 Posted on: 12/08/2017 12:07 PM
But not the trand in performance i think cause the performance win form Maxwell > pascal was huge. Thats why i want to see some benchmark.
But not the trand in performance i think cause the performance win form Maxwell > pascal was huge. Thats why i want to see some benchmark.
lucidus
Senior Member
Posts: 11770
Joined: 2011-12-31
Senior Member
Posts: 11770
Joined: 2011-12-31
#5499067 Posted on: 12/08/2017 12:09 PM
FO4 VR and a gsync bug fix driver, I'll skip.
FO4 VR and a gsync bug fix driver, I'll skip.
dr_rus
Senior Member
Posts: 2981
Joined: 2007-04-17
Senior Member
Posts: 2981
Joined: 2007-04-17
#5499083 Posted on: 12/08/2017 12:55 PM
so if it goes by the trend..
Titan V -> 2080?
The trend is x80 card being released before Titan so this definitely break the trend somewhat.
I do expect 2080 to be faster than this Titan V in gaming too.
Btw had my first UxdService hang on restart after installing these.
so if it goes by the trend..
Titan V -> 2080?
The trend is x80 card being released before Titan so this definitely break the trend somewhat.
I do expect 2080 to be faster than this Titan V in gaming too.
Btw had my first UxdService hang on restart after installing these.
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16122
Joined: 2012-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 16122
Joined: 2012-05-18
#5499110 Posted on: 12/08/2017 02:07 PM
So titan rdy... Ok.. Will try it anyway, don't really have any issues with current 388.43 though.
So titan rdy... Ok.. Will try it anyway, don't really have any issues with current 388.43 though.
entr0cks
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: 2010-06-18
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: 2010-06-18
#5499180 Posted on: 12/08/2017 05:12 PM
Nvidia should do something about their drivers - this one doesn't interest me the slightest - G-sync fix, support for a VR game and support for the latest 3k priced card. Getting notifications from Windows and Geforce experience to update. Each one around half a gig of data.
Same time old drivers remain installed and have junk in like 3-5 locations, adding up to several dozen GB of JUNK. Not excellent for solid state storage.
Nvidia should do something about their drivers - this one doesn't interest me the slightest - G-sync fix, support for a VR game and support for the latest 3k priced card. Getting notifications from Windows and Geforce experience to update. Each one around half a gig of data.
Same time old drivers remain installed and have junk in like 3-5 locations, adding up to several dozen GB of JUNK. Not excellent for solid state storage.
FordLynx07
Senior Member
Posts: 196
Joined: 2008-12-02
Senior Member
Posts: 196
Joined: 2008-12-02
#5499182 Posted on: 12/08/2017 05:17 PM
Thanks for the heads up! Having a great time with the 388.43. But will give this one a spin!
Thanks for the heads up! Having a great time with the 388.43. But will give this one a spin!
dr_rus
Senior Member
Posts: 2981
Joined: 2007-04-17
Senior Member
Posts: 2981
Joined: 2007-04-17
#5499184 Posted on: 12/08/2017 05:19 PM
Oh the horror.
Half a gig, how could they, in 2017!
Or wait... are you writing this from 2007?
this one doesn't interest me the slightest
Oh the horror.
Each one around half a gig of data.
Half a gig, how could they, in 2017!
Not excellent for solid state storage.
Or wait... are you writing this from 2007?
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5499188 Posted on: 12/08/2017 05:29 PM
Same time old drivers remain installed and have junk in like 3-5 locations, adding up to several dozen GB of JUNK. Not excellent for solid state storage.
Several dozen = 36gb+, which is obviously not happening after a few driver installs.
Regardless, SSD space is cheap, so who cares.
Same time old drivers remain installed and have junk in like 3-5 locations, adding up to several dozen GB of JUNK. Not excellent for solid state storage.
Several dozen = 36gb+, which is obviously not happening after a few driver installs.
Regardless, SSD space is cheap, so who cares.
entr0cks
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: 2010-06-18
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: 2010-06-18
#5499208 Posted on: 12/08/2017 06:31 PM
Well one of the machines has up-to-date Windows (10) from June 2014.
There are more then one program littering, it adds up over time. Had something just short of 30GB Nvidia stuff as well.
Just getting pissed over * software design and implementations sometimes (not geared towards Nvidia specifically - nothing crucial). Even over seasoned programmers more then I'd like to. Stuff lasting isn't really a concern - turn it on and off again or format ... Eating away resources - it'll even out after growing for like 3x, GC will have it under control (until something else pokes it).
Fun having a little rant, in a random forum
Well one of the machines has up-to-date Windows (10) from June 2014.
There are more then one program littering, it adds up over time. Had something just short of 30GB Nvidia stuff as well.
Just getting pissed over * software design and implementations sometimes (not geared towards Nvidia specifically - nothing crucial). Even over seasoned programmers more then I'd like to. Stuff lasting isn't really a concern - turn it on and off again or format ... Eating away resources - it'll even out after growing for like 3x, GC will have it under control (until something else pokes it).
Fun having a little rant, in a random forum
dr_rus
Senior Member
Posts: 2981
Joined: 2007-04-17
Senior Member
Posts: 2981
Joined: 2007-04-17
#5499212 Posted on: 12/08/2017 06:39 PM
Seeing a huge performance loss in Far Cry Primal (built-in benchmark) in low resolution here on these:
Not entirely sure that it's due to the new driver though as Windows was patched a couple of times between these benchmarks.
Anyone else interested in checking it out?
Seeing a huge performance loss in Far Cry Primal (built-in benchmark) in low resolution here on these:
Not entirely sure that it's due to the new driver though as Windows was patched a couple of times between these benchmarks.
Anyone else interested in checking it out?
squalles
Senior Member
Posts: 679
Joined: 2003-06-10
Senior Member
Posts: 679
Joined: 2003-06-10
#5499216 Posted on: 12/08/2017 06:53 PM
Seeing a huge performance loss in Far Cry Primal (built-in benchmark) in low resolution here on these:
Not entirely sure that it's due to the new driver though as Windows was patched a couple of times between these benchmarks.
Anyone else interested in checking it out?
Nvidia should do something about their drivers - this one doesn't interest me the slightest - G-sync fix, support for a VR game and support for the latest 3k priced card. Getting notifications from Windows and Geforce experience to update. Each one around half a gig of data.
Same time old drivers remain installed and have junk in like 3-5 locations, adding up to several dozen GB of JUNK. Not excellent for solid state storage.
Has anyone tested AC
rigins? I seem to have the odd micro stutter again. Didn't seem to be an issue on 388.44
yeah... looks better skip these drivers
Seeing a huge performance loss in Far Cry Primal (built-in benchmark) in low resolution here on these:
Not entirely sure that it's due to the new driver though as Windows was patched a couple of times between these benchmarks.
Anyone else interested in checking it out?
Nvidia should do something about their drivers - this one doesn't interest me the slightest - G-sync fix, support for a VR game and support for the latest 3k priced card. Getting notifications from Windows and Geforce experience to update. Each one around half a gig of data.
Same time old drivers remain installed and have junk in like 3-5 locations, adding up to several dozen GB of JUNK. Not excellent for solid state storage.
Has anyone tested AC
rigins? I seem to have the odd micro stutter again. Didn't seem to be an issue on 388.44yeah... looks better skip these drivers
dr_rus
Senior Member
Posts: 2981
Joined: 2007-04-17
Senior Member
Posts: 2981
Joined: 2007-04-17
#5499233 Posted on: 12/08/2017 07:18 PM
To be fair, this is the only performance loss I've ran into so far. Other D3D11 games seem to give the same results as on .31.
yeah... looks better skip these drivers
To be fair, this is the only performance loss I've ran into so far. Other D3D11 games seem to give the same results as on .31.
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16122
Joined: 2012-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 16122
Joined: 2012-05-18
#5499253 Posted on: 12/08/2017 08:18 PM
So far so good, got increase in most of stuff benchmarked.
So far so good, got increase in most of stuff benchmarked.
dr_rus
Senior Member
Posts: 2981
Joined: 2007-04-17
Senior Member
Posts: 2981
Joined: 2007-04-17
#5499256 Posted on: 12/08/2017 08:29 PM
Another game with a 100% reproducible performance loss - but again hard to say if it's this driver's fault as both the game and Windows were updated since the previous benchmark:
Another game with a 100% reproducible performance loss - but again hard to say if it's this driver's fault as both the game and Windows were updated since the previous benchmark:
ocsystem
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2007-04-15
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2007-04-15
#5499265 Posted on: 12/08/2017 09:04 PM
don't understand how many of these whql drivers released by nvidia. quantity=quality.
cant manage to update them. also why nvidia don't use drivers number with a sequence like 388>389>390.
don't understand how many of these whql drivers released by nvidia. quantity=quality.
cant manage to update them. also why nvidia don't use drivers number with a sequence like 388>389>390.
cricket bones
Senior Member
Posts: 577
Joined: 2006-11-12
Senior Member
Posts: 577
Joined: 2006-11-12
#5499267 Posted on: 12/08/2017 09:09 PM
Nvidia should do something about their drivers - this one doesn't interest me the slightest - G-sync fix, support for a VR game and support for the latest 3k priced card. Getting notifications from Windows and Geforce experience to update. Each one around half a gig of data.
Same time old drivers remain installed and have junk in like 3-5 locations, adding up to several dozen GB of JUNK. Not excellent for solid state storage.
You can delete the old ones, genius.
Nvidia should do something about their drivers - this one doesn't interest me the slightest - G-sync fix, support for a VR game and support for the latest 3k priced card. Getting notifications from Windows and Geforce experience to update. Each one around half a gig of data.
Same time old drivers remain installed and have junk in like 3-5 locations, adding up to several dozen GB of JUNK. Not excellent for solid state storage.
You can delete the old ones, genius.
Vidik
Senior Member
Posts: 506
Joined: 2014-03-01
Senior Member
Posts: 506
Joined: 2014-03-01
#5499270 Posted on: 12/08/2017 09:14 PM
Because we would end up with 5-6+ digit driver name hell otherwise. Branches and sub-branches make more sense for developers and consumers especially if new feature is introduced.
why nvidia don't use drivers number with a sequence like 388>389>390.
Because we would end up with 5-6+ digit driver name hell otherwise. Branches and sub-branches make more sense for developers and consumers especially if new feature is introduced.
5 pages 1 2 3 4 5
Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.
Guru3D.com © 2019
Senior Member
Posts: 2981
Joined: 2007-04-17
http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/geforce-388-59-whql-driver-download.html
Titan V is an AI card costing $3000 though.
They say .62 but I see only .59.