Zotac GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming Review
Team Group MP34 NVME SSD (512GB) review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Gaming OC review
Anno 1800: PC graphics performance benchmark review
NZXT H500 Overwatch Special Edition review
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Twin Fan 6 GB Review
Corsair Carbide 275Q review
Cooler Master MK850 keyboard review
WD Blue SN500 NVME SSD (250GB) Review
GeForce 376.80 Vulkan driver download
on: 02/02/2017 05:46 PM [ 18 comment(s) ]
Advertisement
Download the Nvidia GeForce 376.80 Vulkan developer beta driver as released by NVIDIA.
This branch is a development driver offering Vulkan API support. NVIDIA provides full Vulkan support and functionality on NVIDIA GeForce and Quadro graphics card with one of the following Pascal, Maxwell (first or second generation) or Kepler based GPUs:
- Quadro Series: Quadro M6000 24GB, Quadro M6000, Quadro M5000, Quadro M4000, Quadro K6000, Quadro K5200, Quadro K5000, Quadro K4000, Quadro K4200, Quadro K2200, Quadro K2000, Quadro K2000D, Quadro K1200, Quadro K620, Quadro K600, Quadro K420
- Quadro Series (Notebooks): Quadro M5500, Quadro M5000M, Quadro M4000M, Quadro M3000M, Quadro M2000M, Quadro M1000M, Quadro M600M, Quadro K5100M, Quadro K5000M, Quadro K4100M, Quadro K4000M, Quadro K3100M, Quadro K2200M, Quadro K2100M, Quadro K3000M, Quadro K2000M, Quadro K1100M, Quadro K1000M, Quadro K610M, Quadro K510M, Quadro K500M
- GeForce 1000 Series: GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1070, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 1050
- GeForce 900 Series: GeForce GTX TITAN X, GeForce GTX 980 Ti, GeForce GTX 980, GeForce GTX 970, GeForce GTX 960, GeForce GTX 950
- GeForce 700 Series: GeForce GTX TITAN Z, GeForce GTX TITAN Black, GeForce GTX TITAN, GeForce GTX 780 Ti, GeForce GTX 780, GeForce GTX 770, GeForce GTX 760, GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM), GeForce GTX 750 Ti, GeForce GTX 750, GeForce GTX 745, GeForce GT 740, GeForce GT 720, GeForce GT 710
- GeForce 600 Series: GeForce GTX 690, GeForce GTX 680, GeForce GTX 670, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, GeForce GTX 660, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST, GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 650, GeForce GT 635
- GeForce 900M Series (Notebooks): GeForce GTX 980, GeForce GTX 980M, GeForce GTX 970M, GeForce GTX 965M, GeForce GTX 960M, GeForce GTX 950M, GeForce 945M, GeForce 940MX, GeForce 940M, GeForce 930M, GeForce 920M, GeForce 910M
- GeForce 800M Series (Notebooks): GeForce GTX 880M, GeForce GTX 870M, GeForce GTX 860M, GeForce GTX 850M, GeForce 840M, GeForce 830M
- GeForce 700M Series (Notebooks): GeForce GTX 780M, GeForce GTX 770M, GeForce GTX 765M, GeForce GTX 760M, GeForce GT 755M, GeForce GT 750M, GeForce GT 745M, GeForce GT 740M, GeForce GT 735M, GeForce GT 730M
- GeForce 600M Series (Notebooks): GeForce GTX 680MX, GeForce GTX 680M, GeForce GTX 675MX, GeForce GTX 675M, GeForce GTX 670MX, GeForce GTX 660M, GeForce GT 650M, GeForce GT 645M, GeForce GT 640M
Have you read our Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 Aorus Xtreme 8G review already?
DLD
Senior Member
Posts: 783
Joined: 2002-09-14
Senior Member
Posts: 783
Joined: 2002-09-14
#5388133 Posted on: 02/03/2017 03:24 AM
Win7 64bit, so far, so good (haven't played any "volcano titles", though). Thanx.
Win7 64bit, so far, so good (haven't played any "volcano titles", though). Thanx.
greatxerox
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 2016-11-03
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 2016-11-03
#5388146 Posted on: 02/03/2017 05:09 AM
GeForce 1000 Series: GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1070, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 1050
>>> and what about TITAN X PASCAL ?? not supported ??
GeForce 1000 Series: GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1070, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 1050
>>> and what about TITAN X PASCAL ?? not supported ??
pstlouis
Senior Member
Posts: 400
Joined: 2008-01-01
Senior Member
Posts: 400
Joined: 2008-01-01
#5388159 Posted on: 02/03/2017 06:08 AM
No issues, games run properly including The division.
No issues, games run properly including The division.
tensai28
Senior Member
Posts: 1411
Joined: 2013-10-31
Senior Member
Posts: 1411
Joined: 2013-10-31
#5388179 Posted on: 02/03/2017 08:36 AM
vulkan any better with these? I tried it out on doom and it was a lot worse than opengl.
vulkan any better with these? I tried it out on doom and it was a lot worse than opengl.
Handrox
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2013-06-12
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2013-06-12
#5388193 Posted on: 02/03/2017 09:20 AM
GeForce 376.80 vs GeForce 378.49 Doom Vulkan 1080p Great Driver...
https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/16463875-10209321958069212-588570375832443060-o.jpg?oh=bbfd47418905c83e8ec545ad4d96b4e0&oe=5906D93F
GeForce 376.80 vs GeForce 378.49 Doom Vulkan 1080p Great Driver...
https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/16463875-10209321958069212-588570375832443060-o.jpg?oh=bbfd47418905c83e8ec545ad4d96b4e0&oe=5906D93F
HeavyHemi
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2008-10-27
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2008-10-27
#5388195 Posted on: 02/03/2017 09:31 AM
GeForce 376.80 vs GeForce 378.49 Doom Vulkan 1080p Great Driver...
https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/16463875-10209321958069212-588570375832443060-o.jpg?oh=bbfd47418905c83e8ec545ad4d96b4e0&oe=5906D93F
Those results you showed are based on entirely different runs. What are we comparing? 2.5 seconds snip and 60 seconds?
GeForce 376.80 vs GeForce 378.49 Doom Vulkan 1080p Great Driver...
https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/16463875-10209321958069212-588570375832443060-o.jpg?oh=bbfd47418905c83e8ec545ad4d96b4e0&oe=5906D93F
Those results you showed are based on entirely different runs. What are we comparing? 2.5 seconds snip and 60 seconds?
HeavyHemi
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2008-10-27
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2008-10-27
#5388196 Posted on: 02/03/2017 09:33 AM
Yeah, I get a lot worse performance using vulkan than I do using OpenGl.
vulkan any better with these? I tried it out on doom and it was a lot worse than opengl.
Yeah, I get a lot worse performance using vulkan than I do using OpenGl.
Han2K
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2011-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2011-03-10
#5388201 Posted on: 02/03/2017 09:55 AM
Well, with your CPU there's no much profit to get with low driver overhead.
Thaks for the graph, it's seems that 1.0.38 API gets a big improvement.
EDIT: Just tried the driver, and I get aproximately -20 fps compared to OpenGL.
Yeah, I get a lot worse performance using vulkan than I do using OpenGl.
Well, with your CPU there's no much profit to get with low driver overhead.
Thaks for the graph, it's seems that 1.0.38 API gets a big improvement.
EDIT: Just tried the driver, and I get aproximately -20 fps compared to OpenGL.
Handrox
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2013-06-12
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2013-06-12
#5388203 Posted on: 02/03/2017 09:57 AM
Interesting, I did not realize this detail, I retake the test, in the beginning should be both 60s, some mistake of the OCAT. Thanks for warning
PS:
Revised test
https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/16403256-10209323689152488-7408555895117581900-o.jpg?oh=84963758e29ad1ee7ce61be2e732ac79&oe=5949D793
Those results you showed are based on entirely different runs. What are we comparing? 2.5 seconds snip and 60 seconds?
Interesting, I did not realize this detail, I retake the test, in the beginning should be both 60s, some mistake of the OCAT. Thanks for warning
PS:
Revised test
https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/16403256-10209323689152488-7408555895117581900-o.jpg?oh=84963758e29ad1ee7ce61be2e732ac79&oe=5949D793
dr_rus
Senior Member
Posts: 2956
Joined: 2007-04-17
Senior Member
Posts: 2956
Joined: 2007-04-17
#5388219 Posted on: 02/03/2017 10:51 AM
Fraps can monitor Vulkan now?
Fraps can monitor Vulkan now?
Handrox
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2013-06-12
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2013-06-12
#5388223 Posted on: 02/03/2017 10:58 AM
OCAT, But I use a converter that allows me to transfer the txt to the FRAPSbenchview
Fraps can monitor Vulkan now?
OCAT, But I use a converter that allows me to transfer the txt to the FRAPSbenchview
dr_rus
Senior Member
Posts: 2956
Joined: 2007-04-17
Senior Member
Posts: 2956
Joined: 2007-04-17
#5388224 Posted on: 02/03/2017 11:04 AM
Missed that, thanks.
OCAT, But I use a converter that allows me to transfer the txt to the FRAPSbenchview
Missed that, thanks.
Handrox
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2013-06-12
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2013-06-12
#5388225 Posted on: 02/03/2017 11:13 AM
Credits to Alexandre Ziebert, NVIDIA BRASIL.
Just drag the TXT RecordingResults file onto the executable and convert it to the FRAPSBenchViews.
Download:https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByeudBtCZO7cTkE4THNQQ1Mza0E/view?usp=sharing
Missed that, thanks.
Credits to Alexandre Ziebert, NVIDIA BRASIL.
Just drag the TXT RecordingResults file onto the executable and convert it to the FRAPSBenchViews.
Download:https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByeudBtCZO7cTkE4THNQQ1Mza0E/view?usp=sharing
sajibjoarder
Senior Member
Posts: 573
Joined: 2009-03-27
Senior Member
Posts: 573
Joined: 2009-03-27
#5388231 Posted on: 02/03/2017 11:36 AM
getting the error when i lunch doom with vulkan..
Callstack Function(desc) Line Bytes File Process Address
--------------------------- ---- ----- ---- ------- -------
vkWaitForFences() ... + 0x1ac0b65f vulkan-1.dll
GetGameSystemInterface() ... + 0x5a8089b1 DOOMx64vk.exe
GetGameSystemInterface() ... + 0x5a814c14 DOOMx64vk.exe
GetGameSystemInterface() ... + 0x5a80fad1 DOOMx64vk.exe
GetGameSystemInterface() ... + 0x5b0fcd3f DOOMx64vk.exe
** UNKNOWN **(** FUNC_PARAM_ERROR **) ... + 0x59bd7d81 DOOMx64vk.exe
GetGameSystemInterface() ... + 0x5b38882b DOOMx64vk.exe
BaseThreadInitThunk() ... + 0x3ad08364 KERNEL32.DLL
RtlUserThreadStart() ... + 0x3d7a70d1 ntdll.dll
Register Info
---------------------------
EDI: 0x000000000676FFE0 ESI: 0x0000000000000000 EAX: 0x00000000062BB9E0
EBX: 0x0000000006763C50 ECX: 0x00000000066B1800 EDX: 0x0000000000000002
EIP: 0x00007FFF1AC0B65F EBP: 0x00000000041E63F0 SegCs: 0x0000000000000033
EFlags: 0x0000000000010202 ESP: 0x00000000041E62C0 SegSs: 0x000000000000002B
Exception Info
---------------------------
ExpCode: 0xC0000005 (Access Violation)
ExpFlags: 0
ExpAddress: 0x00007FFF1AC0B65F
Build & Runtime Info
---------------------------
User: sajib
Version: 20160808-123534-peach-almond
File Path: D:\Doom\DOOMx64vk.exe
System Time: 2/3/2017 16:31:30
Build String: 20160808-123534-peach-almond
VT File Path:
VMTR Override: generated/pagefiles
Launch Command: "D:\Doom\DOOMx64vk.exe"
Memory Info
---------------------------
In Use: 28%
MB Physical RAM: 8131
MB Physical Free: 5845
MB Paging File: 16227
MB Paging Free: 12986
MB User Address: 134217728
MB User Free: 134216878
CPU Info
---------------------------
Num Packages: 1
Num Cores: 4
Num Logical: 8
CPU ID: Generic
CPU MHz: 3500
getting the error when i lunch doom with vulkan..
Callstack Function(desc) Line Bytes File Process Address
--------------------------- ---- ----- ---- ------- -------
vkWaitForFences() ... + 0x1ac0b65f vulkan-1.dll
GetGameSystemInterface() ... + 0x5a8089b1 DOOMx64vk.exe
GetGameSystemInterface() ... + 0x5a814c14 DOOMx64vk.exe
GetGameSystemInterface() ... + 0x5a80fad1 DOOMx64vk.exe
GetGameSystemInterface() ... + 0x5b0fcd3f DOOMx64vk.exe
** UNKNOWN **(** FUNC_PARAM_ERROR **) ... + 0x59bd7d81 DOOMx64vk.exe
GetGameSystemInterface() ... + 0x5b38882b DOOMx64vk.exe
BaseThreadInitThunk() ... + 0x3ad08364 KERNEL32.DLL
RtlUserThreadStart() ... + 0x3d7a70d1 ntdll.dll
Register Info
---------------------------
EDI: 0x000000000676FFE0 ESI: 0x0000000000000000 EAX: 0x00000000062BB9E0
EBX: 0x0000000006763C50 ECX: 0x00000000066B1800 EDX: 0x0000000000000002
EIP: 0x00007FFF1AC0B65F EBP: 0x00000000041E63F0 SegCs: 0x0000000000000033
EFlags: 0x0000000000010202 ESP: 0x00000000041E62C0 SegSs: 0x000000000000002B
Exception Info
---------------------------
ExpCode: 0xC0000005 (Access Violation)
ExpFlags: 0
ExpAddress: 0x00007FFF1AC0B65F
Build & Runtime Info
---------------------------
User: sajib
Version: 20160808-123534-peach-almond
File Path: D:\Doom\DOOMx64vk.exe
System Time: 2/3/2017 16:31:30
Build String: 20160808-123534-peach-almond
VT File Path:
VMTR Override: generated/pagefiles
Launch Command: "D:\Doom\DOOMx64vk.exe"
Memory Info
---------------------------
In Use: 28%
MB Physical RAM: 8131
MB Physical Free: 5845
MB Paging File: 16227
MB Paging Free: 12986
MB User Address: 134217728
MB User Free: 134216878
CPU Info
---------------------------
Num Packages: 1
Num Cores: 4
Num Logical: 8
CPU ID: Generic
CPU MHz: 3500
squalles
Senior Member
Posts: 673
Joined: 2003-06-10
Senior Member
Posts: 673
Joined: 2003-06-10
#5388297 Posted on: 02/03/2017 02:47 PM
Well, with your CPU there's no much profit to get with low driver overhead.
Thaks for the graph, it's seems that 1.0.38 API gets a big improvement.
EDIT: Just tried the driver, and I get aproximately -20 fps compared to OpenGL.
i have better performance on opengl too... but 5/10fps
you have 20 fps of the difference with .38? and before?
Well, with your CPU there's no much profit to get with low driver overhead.
Thaks for the graph, it's seems that 1.0.38 API gets a big improvement.
EDIT: Just tried the driver, and I get aproximately -20 fps compared to OpenGL.
i have better performance on opengl too... but 5/10fps
you have 20 fps of the difference with .38? and before?
HeavyHemi
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2008-10-27
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2008-10-27
#5388456 Posted on: 02/03/2017 09:59 PM
Interesting, I did not realize this detail, I retake the test, in the beginning should be both 60s, some mistake of the OCAT. Thanks for warning
PS:
Revised test
https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/16403256-10209323689152488-7408555895117581900-o.jpg?oh=84963758e29ad1ee7ce61be2e732ac79&oe=5949D793
There we go...That makes more sense. There is a slight improvement in frame time and FPS. Probably imperceptible on screen.
Interesting, I did not realize this detail, I retake the test, in the beginning should be both 60s, some mistake of the OCAT. Thanks for warning
PS:
Revised test
https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/16403256-10209323689152488-7408555895117581900-o.jpg?oh=84963758e29ad1ee7ce61be2e732ac79&oe=5949D793
There we go...That makes more sense. There is a slight improvement in frame time and FPS. Probably imperceptible on screen.
WebwalkerCZ
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2017-02-03
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2017-02-03
#5388677 Posted on: 02/04/2017 01:25 PM
I think this is a much better way to evaluate the performance of GPUs in Vulkan (youtube.com/watch?v=uChRzAPqF2c)
OCAT, But I use a converter that allows me to transfer the txt to the FRAPSbenchview
I think this is a much better way to evaluate the performance of GPUs in Vulkan (youtube.com/watch?v=uChRzAPqF2c)
Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.
Guru3D.com © 2019
Senior Member
Posts: 2956
Joined: 2007-04-17
VK375_17-25, 1 Feb 2017, installs VulkanRT 1.0.39.1, supports Vulkan 1.0.38.