MSI to unveil 10th Anniversary RTX 2080 Ti Lightning Edition
Ballistix Elite 3600 MHz 16GB Dual Channel DDR4 review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AC2900 Gaming Router review
Asustor Nimbustor 4 (AS5304T) NAS Review
Promo: VIP-SCDKey Games and Windows 10 / Office
be quiet! Dark Rock SLIM review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming OC review
Edifier G4 Pro Headset review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Cooler Master SK621 Compact keyboard review
Prey: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 06/07/2017 01:36 PM [
28 comment(s) ]
We will look at Prey in a PC graphics performance and PC gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
Prey benchmarks,
Prey pc performance
pages 1 2
IceVip
Senior Member
Posts: 653
Senior Member
Posts: 653
Posted on: 06/07/2017 02:51 PM
That moment when you switch from a 290x to a 1070 and see your old gpu
performing better at 4k. So much tears.
That moment when you switch from a 290x to a 1070 and see your old gpu
performing better at 4k. So much tears.
ruggafella
Member
Posts: 23
Member
Posts: 23
Posted on: 06/07/2017 03:02 PM
Thanks for taking the time and doing a sterling job as always HH.
Can I be cheeky and ask for one or two more benchmarks that may prove VERY interesting in light of a recent press event. Could you do some crossfire/sli testing - say, maybe a couple of Furies at 4k? Any other Nvidia cards would be a bonus, but I'd find the 2x Fury (x or otherwise) option fascinating!
Thanks for taking the time and doing a sterling job as always HH.
Can I be cheeky and ask for one or two more benchmarks that may prove VERY interesting in light of a recent press event. Could you do some crossfire/sli testing - say, maybe a couple of Furies at 4k? Any other Nvidia cards would be a bonus, but I'd find the 2x Fury (x or otherwise) option fascinating!
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9121
Senior Member
Posts: 9121
Posted on: 06/07/2017 03:47 PM
That moment when you switch from a 290x to a 1070 and see your old gpu
performing better at 4k. So much tears.
?????????? 290X is slightly slower than the 390x which is 6fps or ~20% slower than 1070.
That moment when you switch from a 290x to a 1070 and see your old gpu
performing better at 4k. So much tears.
?????????? 290X is slightly slower than the 390x which is 6fps or ~20% slower than 1070.
Turanis
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Posted on: 06/07/2017 03:52 PM
Thanks Mr Hilbert.
This game should run well on anything because the gamplay its inside of a bulding/station.
Interiors are not very demanding.
Hope the shadows are enabled on nvidia side,after first days mess.
https://imgur.com/6w4MBj5
Thanks Mr Hilbert.
Looks well optimized. High 1080p frame rate is welcome.
This game should run well on anything because the gamplay its inside of a bulding/station.
Interiors are not very demanding.
Hope the shadows are enabled on nvidia side,after first days mess.
https://imgur.com/6w4MBj5
Amaze
Senior Member
Posts: 2815
Senior Member
Posts: 2815
Posted on: 06/07/2017 03:52 PM
Heh that's one way of putting it. Another way is that it's dated.
But at least it's not a stuttering mess.
Looks well optimized.
Heh that's one way of putting it. Another way is that it's dated.
But at least it's not a stuttering mess.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 10886
Senior Member
Posts: 10886
Posted on: 06/07/2017 04:05 PM
After that mess of a Dishonored 2 this looks very well optimized.
After that mess of a Dishonored 2 this looks very well optimized.
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 8569
Senior Member
Posts: 8569
Posted on: 06/07/2017 04:15 PM
Seems better optimized for AMD than Nvidia.
Looks well optimized.
Seems better optimized for AMD than Nvidia.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12055
Senior Member
Posts: 12055
Posted on: 06/07/2017 04:32 PM
Hope the shadows are enabled on nvidia side,after first days mess.
https://imgur.com/6w4MBj5
Why not AMD?
Hope the shadows are enabled on nvidia side,after first days mess.
https://imgur.com/6w4MBj5
Why not AMD?
zer0_c0ol
Senior Member
Posts: 2976
Senior Member
Posts: 2976
Posted on: 06/07/2017 04:34 PM
It is an AMD game
Seems better optimized for AMD than Nvidia.
It is an AMD game
IceVip
Senior Member
Posts: 653
Senior Member
Posts: 653
Posted on: 06/07/2017 08:28 PM
?????????? 290X is slightly slower than the 390x which is 6fps or ~20% slower than 1070.
Waaait a second, the article changed now. The r9 390x was way above the
1070 in 4k.
?????????? 290X is slightly slower than the 390x which is 6fps or ~20% slower than 1070.
Waaait a second, the article changed now. The r9 390x was way above the
1070 in 4k.
EngEd
Member
Posts: 23
Member
Posts: 23
Posted on: 06/07/2017 08:38 PM
Now this is how a well optimized game for pc is made ;-)
Ubisoft for ex. has alot to learn. Yes even if they are using a completely different engine. Their games suffer better optimization for all gpus. Not everyone can afford a 1080ti which even that card suffer @4k on their newest games.
Now this is how a well optimized game for pc is made ;-)
Ubisoft for ex. has alot to learn. Yes even if they are using a completely different engine. Their games suffer better optimization for all gpus. Not everyone can afford a 1080ti which even that card suffer @4k on their newest games.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35082
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35082
Posted on: 06/07/2017 08:50 PM
Waaait a second, the article changed now. The r9 390x was way above the
1070 in 4k.
There was one entry with typo that got fixed in the first half hour after publication, the 390x. I think it listed 43 where it is 34 So yeah, you are better off with your 1070 purchase !
Hawaii / Grenada however still is going strong.
Waaait a second, the article changed now. The r9 390x was way above the
1070 in 4k.
There was one entry with typo that got fixed in the first half hour after publication, the 390x. I think it listed 43 where it is 34 So yeah, you are better off with your 1070 purchase !
Hawaii / Grenada however still is going strong.
RealNC
Senior Member
Posts: 2822
Senior Member
Posts: 2822
Posted on: 06/07/2017 08:58 PM
Apparently the game has hitching issues when not played from an SSD. The game freezes every couple seconds if you move around, but not if you stay still. Lowering the texture quality setting reduces the issue (the lower the setting, the less problematic the issue becomes, and disappears at the "low" setting.)
FCAT would have caught that, but the benchmark would have needed to be done from a hard disk instead of from an SSD.
So: don't get this game if you don't have an SSD ;-)
(Or: get an SSD, you cheap-asses.)
Apparently the game has hitching issues when not played from an SSD. The game freezes every couple seconds if you move around, but not if you stay still. Lowering the texture quality setting reduces the issue (the lower the setting, the less problematic the issue becomes, and disappears at the "low" setting.)
FCAT would have caught that, but the benchmark would have needed to be done from a hard disk instead of from an SSD.
So: don't get this game if you don't have an SSD ;-)
(Or: get an SSD, you cheap-asses.)
xrodney
Senior Member
Posts: 323
Senior Member
Posts: 323
Posted on: 06/07/2017 09:28 PM
Apparently the game has hitching issues when not played from an SSD. The game freezes every couple seconds if you move around, but not if you stay still. Lowering the texture quality setting reduces the issue (the lower the setting, the less problematic the issue becomes, and disappears at the "low" setting.)
FCAT would have caught that, but the benchmark would have needed to be done from a hard disk instead of from an SSD.
So: don't get this game if you don't have an SSD ;-)
(Or: get an SSD, you cheap-asses.)
I have SSD just for OS and was playing Prey from classic spinning disk just fine.
Apparently the game has hitching issues when not played from an SSD. The game freezes every couple seconds if you move around, but not if you stay still. Lowering the texture quality setting reduces the issue (the lower the setting, the less problematic the issue becomes, and disappears at the "low" setting.)
FCAT would have caught that, but the benchmark would have needed to be done from a hard disk instead of from an SSD.
So: don't get this game if you don't have an SSD ;-)
(Or: get an SSD, you cheap-asses.)
I have SSD just for OS and was playing Prey from classic spinning disk just fine.
IceVip
Senior Member
Posts: 653
Senior Member
Posts: 653
Posted on: 06/07/2017 10:00 PM
There was one entry with typo that got fixed in the first half hour after publication, the 390x. I think it listed 43 where it is 34 So yeah, you are better off with your 1070 purchase !
Hawaii / Grenada however still is going strong.
For a moment there i thought i needed a second set of glasses.
1070 does however way better in every title that I've tested so far so I'm satisfied.
There was one entry with typo that got fixed in the first half hour after publication, the 390x. I think it listed 43 where it is 34 So yeah, you are better off with your 1070 purchase !
Hawaii / Grenada however still is going strong.
For a moment there i thought i needed a second set of glasses.
1070 does however way better in every title that I've tested so far so I'm satisfied.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 10886
Senior Member
Posts: 10886
Posted on: 06/07/2017 10:02 PM
Epic gpu's from AMD. Next time HH, throw in there some Kepler gpus to compare.
Hawaii / Grenada however still is going strong.
Epic gpu's from AMD. Next time HH, throw in there some Kepler gpus to compare.
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9121
Senior Member
Posts: 9121
Posted on: 06/07/2017 10:35 PM
All Kepler and Tahiti GPU's would run out of VRAM at 1080. A 4GB GK104 would likely be around 30-45 fps in 1080.
Epic gpu's from AMD. Next time HH, throw in there some Kepler gpus to compare.
All Kepler and Tahiti GPU's would run out of VRAM at 1080. A 4GB GK104 would likely be around 30-45 fps in 1080.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 10886
Senior Member
Posts: 10886
Posted on: 06/07/2017 11:07 PM
Where are you getting that? gtx1060 3gb is beating even 4gb cards and have no problems keeping 60fps.
Kepler having 30-45fps is isssue on its own, not lack of Vram.
Keep in mind these benchmarks are pre-patch so nvidia is pulling the lead here.
All Kepler and Tahiti GPU's would run out of VRAM at 1080. A 4GB GK104 would likely be around 30-45 fps in 1080.
Where are you getting that? gtx1060 3gb is beating even 4gb cards and have no problems keeping 60fps.
Kepler having 30-45fps is isssue on its own, not lack of Vram.
Keep in mind these benchmarks are pre-patch so nvidia is pulling the lead here.
Guru01
Senior Member
Posts: 339
Senior Member
Posts: 339
Posted on: 06/08/2017 12:10 AM
They did such a great job with optimization in this game even a 1050/1050TI could run it @1080P. Thank you for the article HH.
They did such a great job with optimization in this game even a 1050/1050TI could run it @1080P. Thank you for the article HH.
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9121
Senior Member
Posts: 9121
Posted on: 06/08/2017 02:38 AM
Where are you getting that? gtx1060 3gb is beating even 4gb cards and have no problems keeping 60fps.
Kepler having 30-45fps is isssue on its own, not lack of Vram.
Keep in mind these benchmarks are pre-patch so nvidia is pulling the lead here.
Kepler and Tahiti don't have the color compression Maxwell and Pascal have. Also I said GK104 you know 660ti, 670, 680, 760 and 770. On the high end they were about 50% slower than the 980. GK110 would likely be around 55 for 780 and 65 for 780ti as long as they don't run out of VRAM.
Where are you getting that? gtx1060 3gb is beating even 4gb cards and have no problems keeping 60fps.
Kepler having 30-45fps is isssue on its own, not lack of Vram.
Keep in mind these benchmarks are pre-patch so nvidia is pulling the lead here.
Kepler and Tahiti don't have the color compression Maxwell and Pascal have. Also I said GK104 you know 660ti, 670, 680, 760 and 770. On the high end they were about 50% slower than the 980. GK110 would likely be around 55 for 780 and 65 for 780ti as long as they don't run out of VRAM.
Thunk_It
Senior Member
Posts: 138
Senior Member
Posts: 138
Posted on: 06/08/2017 03:02 AM
Thank you Hilbert for posting this review. As for myself, Prey has been a lot of fun. The final cut scene however, really upset me - you are Morgan Yu until then.
Thank you Hilbert for posting this review. As for myself, Prey has been a lot of fun. The final cut scene however, really upset me - you are Morgan Yu until then.
sammarbella
Senior Member
Posts: 3931
Senior Member
Posts: 3931
Posted on: 06/08/2017 03:25 AM
Hawaii / Grenada however still is going strong.
I missed the 8 GB 290X variant and bought 2 290x 4GB Lightnings.
No regrets, the 4 GB Lightning model can OC a lot specially under water.
IMHO the best AMD GPU deal of the last 5 years: 290X 8 GB
https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/R9-290X-GAMING-8G.html#hero-overview
Some lucky bastards are enjoying that model!
Hawaii / Grenada however still is going strong.
I missed the 8 GB 290X variant and bought 2 290x 4GB Lightnings.
No regrets, the 4 GB Lightning model can OC a lot specially under water.
IMHO the best AMD GPU deal of the last 5 years: 290X 8 GB
https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/R9-290X-GAMING-8G.html#hero-overview
Some lucky bastards are enjoying that model!
ivymike10mt
Senior Member
Posts: 228
Senior Member
Posts: 228
Posted on: 06/08/2017 09:13 AM
Love this game, mechanic, artworks, looks similar to System Shock 2.
Dishonored 2 is a good game also, just have wrong optimisation.
Idtech and cryengine in Prey was a good choice. I can play at 6K@60 lol.
Just one thing. Reactor location seems stuttery, atleast for me ")
Love this game, mechanic, artworks, looks similar to System Shock 2.
Dishonored 2 is a good game also, just have wrong optimisation.
Idtech and cryengine in Prey was a good choice. I can play at 6K@60 lol.
Just one thing. Reactor location seems stuttery, atleast for me ")
PrMinisterGR
Senior Member
Posts: 6972
Senior Member
Posts: 6972
Posted on: 06/08/2017 02:52 PM
They don't. I have finished the game with everything on ultra with a 3GB 7970. It doesn't stutter or do anything weird and it stays at 60fps.
EDIT: Everything on the max setting except the Screen Space reflections which were sitting at half rez. It's not as if they eat a lot of vram.
All Kepler and Tahiti GPU's would run out of VRAM at 1080. A 4GB GK104 would likely be around 30-45 fps in 1080.
They don't. I have finished the game with everything on ultra with a 3GB 7970. It doesn't stutter or do anything weird and it stays at 60fps.
EDIT: Everything on the max setting except the Screen Space reflections which were sitting at half rez. It's not as if they eat a lot of vram.
pages 1 2
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 8812
Looks well optimized. High 1080p frame rate is welcome.