ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AC2900 Gaming Router review
Asustor Nimbustor 4 (AS5304T) NAS Review
Promo: VIP-SCDKey Games and Windows 10 / Office
be quiet! Dark Rock SLIM review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming OC review
Edifier G4 Pro Headset review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Cooler Master SK621 Compact keyboard review
AMD Athlon 220GE and 240GE review
Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 3200 MHz 2x8 GB review
GTA-V PC Graphics Performance Review
Posted by: on: 04/14/2015 05:13 PM [
122 comment(s) ]
In this article we benchmark Grand Theft Auto V (GTA-V) on the PC - many graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. We'll also look at frametimes, graphics memory and a thing or two more.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 5
StewieTech
Chuck Norris
Posts: 2538
Chuck Norris
Posts: 2538
Posted on: 04/14/2015 05:23 PM
Hilbert is the man...Thanks.
Hilbert is the man...Thanks.
Embra
Senior Member
Posts: 807
Senior Member
Posts: 807
Posted on: 04/14/2015 05:28 PM
Nice job!
Nice job!
Major Melchett
Senior Member
Posts: 2456
Senior Member
Posts: 2456
Posted on: 04/14/2015 05:33 PM
Cool, a performance test from Guru - nice to see the 280x doing well.
Cool, a performance test from Guru - nice to see the 280x doing well.
Matt26LFC
Senior Member
Posts: 3058
Senior Member
Posts: 3058
Posted on: 04/14/2015 05:36 PM
Looks like I won't need to upgrade my 2 7970GHz editions for this at 1440p, Tahiti still going strong lol
Looks like I won't need to upgrade my 2 7970GHz editions for this at 1440p, Tahiti still going strong lol
James Frazer
Member
Posts: 83
Member
Posts: 83
Posted on: 04/14/2015 05:39 PM
I have to speak up for those with medium spec cards... You have included plenty of High - Ultra High end cards but very few at the lower ends and totally omitting relatively new cards such as the 750 and 750TI... They may not be powerful enough to run the game on high settings but at least they should be included for comparisons sake and not everyone spends £300+ on a GPU!
I have to speak up for those with medium spec cards... You have included plenty of High - Ultra High end cards but very few at the lower ends and totally omitting relatively new cards such as the 750 and 750TI... They may not be powerful enough to run the game on high settings but at least they should be included for comparisons sake and not everyone spends £300+ on a GPU!
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16122
Senior Member
Posts: 16122
Posted on: 04/14/2015 05:39 PM
nice screenshots too
nice screenshots too
ricardonuno1980
Senior Member
Posts: 4407
Senior Member
Posts: 4407
Posted on: 04/14/2015 05:40 PM
R9 290X is faster than GTX 780 Ti!???????????? NO!!! FAKE!! Because 780 Ti is more expensive and SHOULD be faster than 290X.
R9 290X is faster than GTX 780 Ti!???????????? NO!!! FAKE!! Because 780 Ti is more expensive and SHOULD be faster than 290X.
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 8564
Senior Member
Posts: 8564
Posted on: 04/14/2015 05:42 PM
FCAT charts both show TitanX vs 290x 8gb, but you mention under 2nd chart that its for GTX980.
FCAT charts both show TitanX vs 290x 8gb, but you mention under 2nd chart that its for GTX980.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35044
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35044
Posted on: 04/14/2015 05:45 PM
Ah! Cheers, fixed.
FCAT charts both show TitanX vs 290x 8gb, but you mention under 2nd chart that its for GTX980.
Ah! Cheers, fixed.
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 6586
Senior Member
Posts: 6586
Posted on: 04/14/2015 05:46 PM
"Again all tests have the best quality settings enabled (Ultra) and HBAO is enabled as well as 4xMSAA."
but it reads 2xMSAA on benchmark charts
Page 5
290 so strong
"Again all tests have the best quality settings enabled (Ultra) and HBAO is enabled as well as 4xMSAA."
but it reads 2xMSAA on benchmark charts
Page 5
290 so strong
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35044
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35044
Posted on: 04/14/2015 05:48 PM
"Again all tests have the best quality settings enabled (Ultra) and HBAO is enabled as well as 4xMSAA."
but it reads 2xMSAA on benchmark charts
Page 5
290 so strong
Correcting as we speak ... I wanted the article online right away and have not had time to check or have another editor check it.
"Again all tests have the best quality settings enabled (Ultra) and HBAO is enabled as well as 4xMSAA."
but it reads 2xMSAA on benchmark charts
Page 5
290 so strong
Correcting as we speak ... I wanted the article online right away and have not had time to check or have another editor check it.
Pill Monster
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 25216
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 25216
Posted on: 04/14/2015 05:50 PM
Def interested in this one.... Thx H.
Def interested in this one.... Thx H.
ricardonuno1980
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 4407
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 4407
Posted on: 04/14/2015 06:01 PM
Therefore, NV will fix performance issue for GK110-serie, urgently!!
R9 290X is faster than GTX 780 Ti!???????????? NO!!! FAKE!! Because 780 Ti is more expensive and SHOULD be faster than 290X.
Ok. GK110 is bad optimized because GTX 680 is only little slower than GTX 780 non-Ti.
Therefore, NV will fix performance issue for GK110-serie, urgently!!
Daftshadow
Senior Member
Posts: 1303
Senior Member
Posts: 1303
Posted on: 04/14/2015 06:08 PM
is there a real graphical difference with the advanced graphics turned on vs off? i cant tell. the game still looks beautiful without it. performance is about the same with or without them.
is there a real graphical difference with the advanced graphics turned on vs off? i cant tell. the game still looks beautiful without it. performance is about the same with or without them.
shandy706
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Posted on: 04/14/2015 06:22 PM
This line from the article is incorrect.
You can't release a game on consoles that aren't even out yet.
..was released September 17, 2013 for PlayStation 4, PlayStation 3, Xbox 360, Xbox One.
This line from the article is incorrect.
You can't release a game on consoles that aren't even out yet.
vbetts
Posts: 14345
Posts: 14345
Posted on: 04/14/2015 06:27 PM
So this game is easily the best purchase I have made in awhile, runs great, it is very fun, and I cannot stop playing it!
So this game is easily the best purchase I have made in awhile, runs great, it is very fun, and I cannot stop playing it!
Solfaur
Senior Member
Posts: 7032
Senior Member
Posts: 7032
Posted on: 04/14/2015 06:44 PM
Good job Hilbert, do you have an imput on how is it possible that this game looks like it stacks vram in multi-gpu systems? Or is it a bug?
I have supposedly have 8192MB vram available in the graphics menu (I use about 7800MB of that), and I did slide pretty much everything to the max with 4xMSAA, TXAA, nividia PCSS etc. @1440p, even in advanced graphics I have everything but the first slider, which is only to the middle of the bar(I need like 8300MB of vram with that at max).
Surprisngly, the game runs VERY well even in these circumstances. I have 60 FPS almost everywhere in the city, outside them, in the outskirts, and I don't understand why, my FPS drops in the 40s there. Hence why I went for adaptive vsync, which works great. I could drop some sliders and have "pure smooth" 60 FPS all the time, but I prefer the slight drop now and again, because the extra visual quality makes it worth it.
Good job Hilbert, do you have an imput on how is it possible that this game looks like it stacks vram in multi-gpu systems? Or is it a bug?
I have supposedly have 8192MB vram available in the graphics menu (I use about 7800MB of that), and I did slide pretty much everything to the max with 4xMSAA, TXAA, nividia PCSS etc. @1440p, even in advanced graphics I have everything but the first slider, which is only to the middle of the bar(I need like 8300MB of vram with that at max).
Surprisngly, the game runs VERY well even in these circumstances. I have 60 FPS almost everywhere in the city, outside them, in the outskirts, and I don't understand why, my FPS drops in the 40s there. Hence why I went for adaptive vsync, which works great. I could drop some sliders and have "pure smooth" 60 FPS all the time, but I prefer the slight drop now and again, because the extra visual quality makes it worth it.
chilly willy
Senior Member
Posts: 556
Senior Member
Posts: 556
Posted on: 04/14/2015 06:59 PM
I for sure had a good feeling about this game coming from the 360 version. I never preorder I have only done it 3x in over 20 years of gaming and this game on pc was my 3rd preorder.
Upon booting up the game the first time I just cranked everything up to max(except msaa) i turned everything on even advanced settings and set res to 3200x1800 and I was very surprised most of the map gets great fps. i just drove around in solo gta online last night for like 3 hours while watching daredevil series on netflix. a couple times in the heavily wooded areas i dipped down to 20fps for a bit but the strange thing is that the game still felt totally playable I had the steam fps counter on the whole time.
When i play later today im going to delve into the settings a bit and see what is really necessary. like for example i didnt notice much difference in the advanced draw distance as compared to maxing out the regular. and i might lower pedestrians a bit to see if that cuts down traffic slightly to make driving a little easier.
By far the most noticeable difference to me coming from the 360 version besides the graphics of course is the feel of the ui and just the responsiveness in general. everything just snaps! so fluid and smooth. and online doesnt feel like its chugging like it still does on the xbox one and ps4 versions do a bit.
Now to wait for port reports on MKX! i am a big mortal kombat fan but i did not feel confident about the pc version enough to preorder that. also i try to only spend 100$ a year on gaming so im over halfway through that already
I for sure had a good feeling about this game coming from the 360 version. I never preorder I have only done it 3x in over 20 years of gaming and this game on pc was my 3rd preorder.
Upon booting up the game the first time I just cranked everything up to max(except msaa) i turned everything on even advanced settings and set res to 3200x1800 and I was very surprised most of the map gets great fps. i just drove around in solo gta online last night for like 3 hours while watching daredevil series on netflix. a couple times in the heavily wooded areas i dipped down to 20fps for a bit but the strange thing is that the game still felt totally playable I had the steam fps counter on the whole time.
When i play later today im going to delve into the settings a bit and see what is really necessary. like for example i didnt notice much difference in the advanced draw distance as compared to maxing out the regular. and i might lower pedestrians a bit to see if that cuts down traffic slightly to make driving a little easier.
By far the most noticeable difference to me coming from the 360 version besides the graphics of course is the feel of the ui and just the responsiveness in general. everything just snaps! so fluid and smooth. and online doesnt feel like its chugging like it still does on the xbox one and ps4 versions do a bit.
Now to wait for port reports on MKX! i am a big mortal kombat fan but i did not feel confident about the pc version enough to preorder that. also i try to only spend 100$ a year on gaming so im over halfway through that already
cowie
Senior Member
Posts: 13146
Senior Member
Posts: 13146
Posted on: 04/14/2015 07:06 PM
I cant believe the game runs as decent as it does......biggest surprise of 2015.
Hilbert if you do re-test can you find a 750/Ti?
You have closely performing cards to get some idea if you don't but I thought I'd ask.
I cant believe the game runs as decent as it does......biggest surprise of 2015.
Hilbert if you do re-test can you find a 750/Ti?
You have closely performing cards to get some idea if you don't but I thought I'd ask.
zer0_c0ol
Senior Member
Posts: 2976
Senior Member
Posts: 2976
Posted on: 04/14/2015 07:09 PM
what the **** is wrong with u
R9 290X is faster than GTX 780 Ti!???????????? NO!!! FAKE!! Because 780 Ti is more expensive and SHOULD be faster than 290X.
what the **** is wrong with u
rodrigoles
Senior Member
Posts: 212
Senior Member
Posts: 212
Posted on: 04/14/2015 07:15 PM
Ok. GK110 is bad optimized because GTX 680 is only little slower than GTX 780 non-Ti.
Therefore, NV will fix performance issue for GK110-serie, urgently!!
Good luck with that.
GK110 is old news. Nvidia's focus is on Maxwell since it's where they're making money now.
Ok. GK110 is bad optimized because GTX 680 is only little slower than GTX 780 non-Ti.
Therefore, NV will fix performance issue for GK110-serie, urgently!!
Good luck with that.
GK110 is old news. Nvidia's focus is on Maxwell since it's where they're making money now.
zer0_c0ol
Senior Member
Posts: 2976
Senior Member
Posts: 2976
Posted on: 04/14/2015 07:16 PM
amd on top..nice
amd on top..nice
WhiteLightning
Posts: 27645
Posts: 27645
Posted on: 04/14/2015 07:18 PM
wow Titan X does very well in this.
wow Titan X does very well in this.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 10847
Senior Member
Posts: 10847
Posted on: 04/14/2015 07:21 PM
Its doing very well, i'm glad.
Nice review, HH.
Cool, a performance test from Guru - nice to see the 280x doing well.
Its doing very well, i'm glad.
Nice review, HH.
pages 1 2 3 4 5
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 10119
Rockstar have done a fantastic job with this game imo, I've been impressed with the performance I've had in the little I've played so far. Great review as always!