be quiet! Dark Rock TF2 review
Basemark GPU v1.2 benchmarks with 36 GPUs
Corsair MP600 Pro XT PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
G.Skill TridentZ Royal Elite DDR4 3600 MHz CL14 review
GeForce GTX 970 SLI review
Posted by: on: 09/26/2014 01:44 PM [
69 comment(s) ]
We review Nvidias little money maker, the GeForce GTX 970 but this time in a 2-way SLI. As such we'll be going from fast to faaaaast. In this review we'll run the standard benchmarks, but we will also have a good look at Ultra HD gaming performance as well as a micro stuttering analysis with the help of FCAT. Join us in this review where we'll once again look at everything.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
nvidia
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 41837
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 41837
Posted on: 09/26/2014 01:56 PM
Great review as always Hilbert!
Though, 73 fps in Metro LL @ 1440p doesn't excite me, same goes for Crysis 3. I kinda expected more.
Weeeeeelll ... It's nearly double scaling, so that's not bad. Crysis slowly seems to get get more CPU dependent with its age though.
Right, that was 8 articles in 7 days you guys. Beer and pizza time ! Beer-assistant, where is she ?!!
Great review as always Hilbert!
Though, 73 fps in Metro LL @ 1440p doesn't excite me, same goes for Crysis 3. I kinda expected more.
Weeeeeelll ... It's nearly double scaling, so that's not bad. Crysis slowly seems to get get more CPU dependent with its age though.
Right, that was 8 articles in 7 days you guys. Beer and pizza time ! Beer-assistant, where is she ?!!
Corbus
Senior Member
Posts: 2464
Senior Member
Posts: 2464
Posted on: 09/26/2014 02:01 PM
Great review and scaling. At 4k we probably still need to wait 2 more years to play at decent fps and max details .
Great review and scaling. At 4k we probably still need to wait 2 more years to play at decent fps and max details .
Ven0m
Senior Member
Posts: 1802
Senior Member
Posts: 1802
Posted on: 09/26/2014 02:18 PM
Thanks for the review. I hope you'll be able to find out what's with these frame drops. It's also weird to observe better scaling in lower resolutions...
So:
* 4k, 3D Mark and Battlefield = 780 Ti scales better
* The rest = 970 scales better
I think that it might be partially explained by 256bit RAM bus in 970.
Thanks for the review. I hope you'll be able to find out what's with these frame drops. It's also weird to observe better scaling in lower resolutions...
So:
* 4k, 3D Mark and Battlefield = 780 Ti scales better
* The rest = 970 scales better
I think that it might be partially explained by 256bit RAM bus in 970.
(.)(.)
Senior Member
Posts: 9094
Senior Member
Posts: 9094
Posted on: 09/26/2014 02:23 PM
Thanks for the review. I hope you'll be able to find out what's with these frame drops. It's also weird to observe better scaling in lower resolutions...
So:
* 4k, 3D Mark and Battlefield = 780 Ti scales better
* The rest = 970 scales better
I think that it might be partially explained by 256bit RAM bus in 970.
I knew it... wea dat 512bit at.
Thanks for the review. I hope you'll be able to find out what's with these frame drops. It's also weird to observe better scaling in lower resolutions...
So:
* 4k, 3D Mark and Battlefield = 780 Ti scales better
* The rest = 970 scales better
I think that it might be partially explained by 256bit RAM bus in 970.
I knew it... wea dat 512bit at.
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Posts: 9094
Great review as always Hilbert!
Though, 73 fps in Metro LL @ 1440p doesn't excite me, same goes for Crysis 3. I kinda expected more.