Asus ROG Strix XG27UQ review
be quiet! Pure Rock 2 review
Fractal Design Define 7 Compact review
Lian Li Galahad 360 liquid cooler review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - July 2020
Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 3600 MHz (64GB) review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited)
Kioxia Exceria 960 GB SATA3 SSD review
HP Portable P500 1TB Portable USB3 SSD review
EK-Quantum Magnitude WaterBlock Review
GeForce GTX 970 SLI review
Posted by: on: 09/26/2014 01:44 PM [
69 comment(s) ]
We review Nvidias little money maker, the GeForce GTX 970 but this time in a 2-way SLI. As such we'll be going from fast to faaaaast. In this review we'll run the standard benchmarks, but we will also have a good look at Ultra HD gaming performance as well as a micro stuttering analysis with the help of FCAT. Join us in this review where we'll once again look at everything.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
nvidia
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38535
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38535
Posted on: 09/26/2014 01:56 PM
Great review as always Hilbert!
Though, 73 fps in Metro LL @ 1440p doesn't excite me, same goes for Crysis 3. I kinda expected more.
Weeeeeelll ... It's nearly double scaling, so that's not bad. Crysis slowly seems to get get more CPU dependent with its age though.
Right, that was 8 articles in 7 days you guys. Beer and pizza time ! Beer-assistant, where is she ?!!
Great review as always Hilbert!
Though, 73 fps in Metro LL @ 1440p doesn't excite me, same goes for Crysis 3. I kinda expected more.
Weeeeeelll ... It's nearly double scaling, so that's not bad. Crysis slowly seems to get get more CPU dependent with its age though.
Right, that was 8 articles in 7 days you guys. Beer and pizza time ! Beer-assistant, where is she ?!!
Corbus
Senior Member
Posts: 2400
Senior Member
Posts: 2400
Posted on: 09/26/2014 02:01 PM
Great review and scaling. At 4k we probably still need to wait 2 more years to play at decent fps and max details .
Great review and scaling. At 4k we probably still need to wait 2 more years to play at decent fps and max details .
Ven0m
Senior Member
Posts: 1769
Senior Member
Posts: 1769
Posted on: 09/26/2014 02:18 PM
Thanks for the review. I hope you'll be able to find out what's with these frame drops. It's also weird to observe better scaling in lower resolutions...
So:
* 4k, 3D Mark and Battlefield = 780 Ti scales better
* The rest = 970 scales better
I think that it might be partially explained by 256bit RAM bus in 970.
Thanks for the review. I hope you'll be able to find out what's with these frame drops. It's also weird to observe better scaling in lower resolutions...
So:
* 4k, 3D Mark and Battlefield = 780 Ti scales better
* The rest = 970 scales better
I think that it might be partially explained by 256bit RAM bus in 970.
(.)(.)
Senior Member
Posts: 9094
Senior Member
Posts: 9094
Posted on: 09/26/2014 02:23 PM
Thanks for the review. I hope you'll be able to find out what's with these frame drops. It's also weird to observe better scaling in lower resolutions...
So:
* 4k, 3D Mark and Battlefield = 780 Ti scales better
* The rest = 970 scales better
I think that it might be partially explained by 256bit RAM bus in 970.
I knew it... wea dat 512bit at.
Thanks for the review. I hope you'll be able to find out what's with these frame drops. It's also weird to observe better scaling in lower resolutions...
So:
* 4k, 3D Mark and Battlefield = 780 Ti scales better
* The rest = 970 scales better
I think that it might be partially explained by 256bit RAM bus in 970.
I knew it... wea dat 512bit at.
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Posts: 9094
Great review as always Hilbert!
Though, 73 fps in Metro LL @ 1440p doesn't excite me, same goes for Crysis 3. I kinda expected more.