Intel Core i9 9900KS processor review
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
ASUS PRIME X570 Pro review
ASUS ROG STRIX Scope keyboard review
GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 Super WTF review
ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT THICC III Ultra review
Promo: URcdkey Halloween sale Windows 10 Pro for 11$
Gears of War 5: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 09/10/2019 02:47 PM [
50 comment(s) ]
We take a look at Gears of War 5 (2019) in our usual in-depth ways. That would be tested on the PC gaming wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11853
Senior Member
Posts: 11853
Posted on: 09/10/2019 03:14 PM
See how UE4 can perform good on amd cards if handled right. Agreed with @vbetts even last gen midrange cards will do just fine.
See how UE4 can perform good on amd cards if handled right. Agreed with @vbetts even last gen midrange cards will do just fine.
Only Intruder
Senior Member
Posts: 1128
Senior Member
Posts: 1128
Posted on: 09/10/2019 03:21 PM
Oof, Fiji based cards are doing crap in this title :'( VRAM limitation?
Oof, Fiji based cards are doing crap in this title :'( VRAM limitation?
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 3658
Senior Member
Posts: 3658
Posted on: 09/10/2019 03:25 PM
VRAM, maybe ACE too.
Oof, Fiji based cards are doing crap in this title :'( VRAM limitation?
VRAM, maybe ACE too.
UZ7
Senior Member
Posts: 5496
Senior Member
Posts: 5496
Posted on: 09/10/2019 03:34 PM
No CPU scaling?
Most of the reviews I've seen shows significant differences from 2-6+
Edit: nvm 9900K boosts pretty high and the other reviews weren't using the same cpu 4/8-8/16 seem to be on par
No CPU scaling?
Most of the reviews I've seen shows significant differences from 2-6+
Edit: nvm 9900K boosts pretty high and the other reviews weren't using the same cpu 4/8-8/16 seem to be on par
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36304
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36304
Posted on: 09/10/2019 03:41 PM
Page 4 matey ..
No CPU scaling?
Page 4 matey ..
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11853
Senior Member
Posts: 11853
Posted on: 09/10/2019 03:43 PM
Looking at 1440p and how rx590 is beating 1660ti smells like a vram limitation. Does game have even insane texture setting beside ultra?
Looking at 1440p and how rx590 is beating 1660ti smells like a vram limitation. Does game have even insane texture setting beside ultra?
Gomez Addams
Member
Posts: 39
Member
Posts: 39
Posted on: 09/10/2019 03:53 PM
This phrase : "Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked", appears twice in the second paragraph.
This phrase : "Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked", appears twice in the second paragraph.
asturur
Senior Member
Posts: 404
Senior Member
Posts: 404
Posted on: 09/10/2019 04:06 PM
I did not expect the game to not hit 120fps at 1080p with the top high end cards.
I did not expect the game to not hit 120fps at 1080p with the top high end cards.
fry178
Senior Member
Posts: 1188
Senior Member
Posts: 1188
Posted on: 09/10/2019 04:14 PM
Even that this isnt the forum for ppl asking how to turn on their pc
,
i would still like to see results for 1 or 2 res with vsync on.
It's still used by a lot of ppl that dont like tearing, and it does lower fps by a noticeable amount.
Maybe not when testing W, but at least for games and lets say 1080p..
Even that this isnt the forum for ppl asking how to turn on their pc
,i would still like to see results for 1 or 2 res with vsync on.
It's still used by a lot of ppl that dont like tearing, and it does lower fps by a noticeable amount.
Maybe not when testing W, but at least for games and lets say 1080p..
jbscotchman
Senior Member
Posts: 3199
Senior Member
Posts: 3199
Posted on: 09/10/2019 04:38 PM
Check the review again, there's a known issues with the 1660ti and 415.30 drivers.
Looking at 1440p and how rx590 is beating 1660ti smells like a vram limitation. Does game have even insane texture setting beside ultra?
Check the review again, there's a known issues with the 1660ti and 415.30 drivers.
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1668
Senior Member
Posts: 1668
Posted on: 09/10/2019 04:47 PM
It does show the top of the Nvidia card selection is pretty strong when Nvidia could use an AMD sponsored game in their own marketing material no problem.
While this is a sponsored title by AMD, it's still an Unreal Engine 4 game which definitely favors Nvidia. Although either system you aren't going to have an issue running it.
It does show the top of the Nvidia card selection is pretty strong when Nvidia could use an AMD sponsored game in their own marketing material no problem.
airbud7
Senior Member
Posts: 7508
Senior Member
Posts: 7508
Posted on: 09/10/2019 04:49 PM
Hey nice review Hilbert!
Glad my old gtx 1060 still has game left it @1080p....same with my 480....so glad you included them in the review.
Hey nice review Hilbert!
Glad my old gtx 1060 still has game left it @1080p....same with my 480....so glad you included them in the review.
Ricard10s
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Posted on: 09/10/2019 05:05 PM
Why the 1660 performs better than the 1660ti ??
Why the 1660 performs better than the 1660ti ??
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 3658
Senior Member
Posts: 3658
Posted on: 09/10/2019 05:06 PM
there is not a known issue with the 1660ti and 43x drivers, and we can't assume otherwise until both hardware vendors are able to run the software with the same api features enabled.
Check the review again, there's a known issues with the 1660ti and 415.30 drivers.
there is not a known issue with the 1660ti and 43x drivers, and we can't assume otherwise until both hardware vendors are able to run the software with the same api features enabled.
Only Intruder
Senior Member
Posts: 1128
Senior Member
Posts: 1128
Posted on: 09/10/2019 05:06 PM
Not being utilised fully? Fiji has 8 ACEs if I remember rightly? Same as Hawaii?
VRAM, maybe ACE too.
Not being utilised fully? Fiji has 8 ACEs if I remember rightly? Same as Hawaii?
jbscotchman
Senior Member
Posts: 3199
Senior Member
Posts: 3199
Posted on: 09/10/2019 05:12 PM
I mean to say 430x, not 415x. Did you not see Hilbert's update on the chart pages? "* We're aware of an issue with the 1660 Ti, the driver (.30) is doing something weird at Full HD and WQHD." Whe else would a non ti and 590 be giving the same performance?
there is not a known issue with the 1660ti and 43x drivers, and we can't assume otherwise until both hardware vendors are able to run the software with the same api features enabled.
I mean to say 430x, not 415x. Did you not see Hilbert's update on the chart pages? "* We're aware of an issue with the 1660 Ti, the driver (.30) is doing something weird at Full HD and WQHD." Whe else would a non ti and 590 be giving the same performance?
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 3658
Senior Member
Posts: 3658
Posted on: 09/10/2019 05:23 PM
That was written by Hilbert/reviewer, and his observation.
Doesn't translate to "Theres a known issue in the driver".
Theres some weird ass behavior with turing in general in this game.
the 2070 is being beaten by the 2060 super for instance.... o_O
they should either be sitting fairly even with the 2070 edging ahead.
should also be ahead of the 1080
I mean to say 430x, not 415x. Did you not see Hilbert's update on the chart pages? "* We're aware of an issue with the 1660 Ti, the driver (.30) is doing something weird at Full HD and WQHD." Whe else would a non ti and 590 be giving the same performance?
That was written by Hilbert/reviewer, and his observation.
Doesn't translate to "Theres a known issue in the driver".
Theres some weird ass behavior with turing in general in this game.
the 2070 is being beaten by the 2060 super for instance.... o_O
they should either be sitting fairly even with the 2070 edging ahead.
should also be ahead of the 1080
kakiharaFRS
Senior Member
Posts: 189
Senior Member
Posts: 189
Posted on: 09/10/2019 06:52 PM
geeez those fps in 4K
geeez those fps in 4K
HARDRESET
Senior Member
Posts: 408
Senior Member
Posts: 408
Posted on: 09/10/2019 07:36 PM
1080 Ti has it going on!
1080 Ti has it going on!
XP-200
Senior Member
Posts: 4984
Senior Member
Posts: 4984
Posted on: 09/10/2019 07:46 PM
Well i watched the benchmark video and i can only assume that YT is impacting on that video because the game looks just terrieble in that benchmark video, the vibrante colours and lighting effects of the game look all grey and dull for some reason, what is going on there then, is YT messing it up in compression possibly, and even picking 4k to watch the video in does not help, the game look way better than anything in that benchmark on the XBX so i would have assumed a PC with a RTX2080 would look bee knees on ultra settings, and not so grey and washed out as it does in that video, i mean the snow levels are eye popping in the game so i have no idea what is going on with that benchmark video.
Well i watched the benchmark video and i can only assume that YT is impacting on that video because the game looks just terrieble in that benchmark video, the vibrante colours and lighting effects of the game look all grey and dull for some reason, what is going on there then, is YT messing it up in compression possibly, and even picking 4k to watch the video in does not help, the game look way better than anything in that benchmark on the XBX so i would have assumed a PC with a RTX2080 would look bee knees on ultra settings, and not so grey and washed out as it does in that video, i mean the snow levels are eye popping in the game so i have no idea what is going on with that benchmark video.
Noufel
Senior Member
Posts: 106
Senior Member
Posts: 106
Posted on: 09/10/2019 08:03 PM
the 1080ti still rocking
the 1080ti still rocking
Netherwind
Senior Member
Posts: 6863
Senior Member
Posts: 6863
Posted on: 09/10/2019 08:07 PM
Tried Gears 4 on my 2080Ti and although the benchmark showed a steady 60fps result at 4K, playing the game was a different story meaning I couldn't maintain 60fps at all times at Ultra settings. I guess some tweaking is necessary after all.
While this is a sponsored title by AMD, it's still an Unreal Engine 4 game which definitely favors Nvidia. Although either system you aren't going to have an issue running it.
Tried Gears 4 on my 2080Ti and although the benchmark showed a steady 60fps result at 4K, playing the game was a different story meaning I couldn't maintain 60fps at all times at Ultra settings. I guess some tweaking is necessary after all.
SameOldx2
Senior Member
Posts: 119
Senior Member
Posts: 119
Posted on: 09/10/2019 09:55 PM
This game uses some sort of DRS below your minimum framerate setting. I have mine set to 60 fps. With my 1070 in 4k ultra in the benchmark, a little over 50% of the frames are rendered in full 4k. The rest a lower res. Which improves performance. Instead 29 fps, I get 57fps on ultra. Haven't seen a 2080ti render every frame in 4k even.
This game uses some sort of DRS below your minimum framerate setting. I have mine set to 60 fps. With my 1070 in 4k ultra in the benchmark, a little over 50% of the frames are rendered in full 4k. The rest a lower res. Which improves performance. Instead 29 fps, I get 57fps on ultra. Haven't seen a 2080ti render every frame in 4k even.
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 3658
Senior Member
Posts: 3658
Posted on: 09/11/2019 05:42 AM
change your driver video output to Full, your screen is full but your driver is playing the video back in limited w/Acceleration.
Well i watched the benchmark video and i can only assume that YT is impacting on that video because the game looks just terrieble in that benchmark video, the vibrante colours and lighting effects of the game look all grey and dull for some reason, what is going on there then, is YT messing it up in compression possibly, and even picking 4k to watch the video in does not help, the game look way better than anything in that benchmark on the XBX so i would have assumed a PC with a RTX2080 would look bee knees on ultra settings, and not so grey and washed out as it does in that video, i mean the snow levels are eye popping in the game so i have no idea what is going on with that benchmark video.
change your driver video output to Full, your screen is full but your driver is playing the video back in limited w/Acceleration.
pages 1 2
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Posts: 14714
While this is a sponsored title by AMD, it's still an Unreal Engine 4 game which definitely favors Nvidia. Although either system you aren't going to have an issue running it.