Translation = From now on we will use lube every time we bend you over.

I'm saying people only enjoy Skyrim because of the graphical modding, not the actual game. That game has horrible gameplay and story, it's all about those high-res textures, modded graphics, enb whatever, etc. I personally prefer gameplay over graphics. I loved DmC and the graphics in that game were laughable at a lot of parts.

bigtime isn't completely wrong. look at skyrim, completely garbage game but huge modding community specifically for graphics.

I remember Microsoft saying the same thing and did nothing. I hope that this statement could be a prelude to the death of consoles.

Fair's fair, both Far Cry3 and Future soldier are very PC friendly, shame they nerfed the Far Cry3 graphics but whatever, next gen consoles will help us out there. Also Far Cry3 has many fans it's gotta be said, many folks really enjoyed that one.

People saying people prefer graphics over gameplay I think are missing the point. People want good gameplay, but much of the gameplay is already ruined because the game also has to cater for consoles and they try and keep the platforms similar. Graphics wise, people want good graphics because quite frankly it sucks when the graphics aren't really much better than what you could find on a Xbox 360 or PS4 and takes an uber or uberish build to play it. Also, using post processing and other effects to improve crap graphics is just well, crap! All we are asking for is having good base graphics that these effects can then build upon. The reason why people mod games like Crysis 2, Skyrim etc to look better is because you can, and despite all else you shouldn't need to! It seems most of the problem is that when making games, the textures are made for Xbox 360/PS4, then what appears to be upsampled for PC resolution. Upsampling may remove some jaggies but also increases softness and blurring, and there isn't any new detail in the picture, only extrapolated detail as a result of the upsampling. The best way is to make high res textures to start with, then downsample for consoles! It would give a superior experience on PC, and would actually look better for consoles too. Buying a PC and being stuck with console graphics is like buying a Ferrari or any other car of that stature, and then being constantly stuck in 15 km/hr traffic. It would really suck! Sure you have a fast car (computer) but you can't have fun playing it. The road could be a great road for having fun on (gameplay) if it weren't for the traffic. It seems all those bitching about PC gamers complaining about graphics miss the very important fact that gameplay is not just about how the game is played, but the entire playing experience. Graphics do play a big role in this as it creates the sense of immersion. If we wanted just the same gameplay without caring about graphics we'd all have consoles and be playing with Wolfenstein (original) style graphics.

Consoles aren't going anywhere anytime soon. They're easier and cheaper to develop games for than PC while also being more profitable.

Drop the dystopian DRM system and PC gamers would naturally go back to Ubisoft. EA learned that lesson a few years ago, Ubisoft should take note. deltatux

What DRM? It's no worse than steam.

Well, something is wrong when you purchase one of their games on Steam and they still make you create a "Uplay" account. So yeah, like EA, having ****ing 2 programs open to play a game is getting nuts.

Then isn't that a Steam issue?, shouldn't Steam make it so once you buy the game off them it only needs Uplay to run from that point?

That's why the next gen consoles use a pc architecture? To be easier to develope games? I ask you to be better informed before posting this kind of replies.