Tick Tock Tock Says Intel Now As Well

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Tick Tock Tock Says Intel Now As Well on our message forum
#5249443
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/220/220188.jpg
at this rate AMD will surely catch up, its like there's now a relative performance barrier, so AMD gets there and all they can do is a war on prices until some miracle removes the barrier maybe in the mean time we get some overdue upgrades like 10gbit networking as standard
#5249458
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245459.jpg
at this rate AMD will surely catch up, its like there's now a relative performance barrier, so AMD gets there and all they can do is a war on prices until some miracle removes the barrier maybe in the mean time we get some overdue upgrades like 10gbit networking as standard
Yeah, interesting idea.
#5249463
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/164/164033.jpg
It's ok. AMD can play catch up on the process size. They were stuck on the 28/32nm for way too long, when Intel was soldiering on to 22nm and 14nm. AMD was left in dust in energy efficiency simply because of that already.
#5249475
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/264/264961.jpg
wasnt this chart show a few months ago? I kind curious when the "2016 optimize" chips are gona be released. mostly cause i still havent made my new build
you and me both, arent we from the same year?! How bout we go up this christmas 🙂
#5249497
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/210/210583.jpg
they simply want to stay on the same node for longer.. this will give them more time to go for smaller transistors.. its a hard process now.. and since there is no big challenge from amd they are feeling free
#5249543
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/227/227853.jpg
why some people like me actually want the igp for quicksync purposes. what they could do is offer 2 versions one with igp and 1 without.
Well yeah, that's close to what I said. The K processors should have primitive (read: small) IGPs. No IGP is a bit extreme I mean what if your dGPU dies? But you have a great point about quicksync.
Why does it say Ivy bridge is i3? Ivy bridge is i5?
The graph means that the naming scheme is 'Core i' followed by the number code of the respective part '3xxx'. So it's not Core i3, it's practically Core ix 3xxx. Example: Core i7 3770.
#5250643
data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp
Crazy, bought a 3930k right when they came out...Still feel like its very powerful and have zero need to upgrade...4.5ghz

Previous Page