spectatorx:

By personal experience i can say minimum requirements are for 1280x720 (a.k.a. 720p) and recommended are for 1920x1080 (a.k.a. 1080p). In the past i had hd7790 which is more powerful than hd7770 and on this card in tomb raider (2013) i had to drop resolution to 1280x720 to make it have playable framerate with more than medium settings. On consoles "4K" (hahahahahahha, that's a good joke) is marketing BS for dumb people and on technical side it is normal game upscaled to 4K with maybe some minor post effects added to hide problems which upscaling causes. In most cases games are upscaled from 900p or lower resolutions.

What!?!?! Buddy you have ZERO idea what you are talking about... There are quite a few native 4K titles (even 4K@60fps) on the XboxOneX... I own one and can tell you that first hand. Besides that, Digital Foundry analyzes each title that comes out enhanced for the PS4 Pro and the X1X and while the PS4 Pro rarely does native 4K the X1X does it quite often... You need to educate yourself before making such ignorant posts. And before you start throwing out the "console peasant" B.S... I own 4 gaming PC's... One in my "man-cave" one in my living room, one in my computer room and one in my bedroom... I have 3 kids and a wife who ALL game. My main PC is a i7 8700k@5.1GHz water-cooled with 16GBDDR4@3200MHz and a water-cooled Pascal TitanX... I built each system and have been into PC's and gaming since the 80's... I know what I'm talking about... Unlike you.

it strange, why minimum requirement GTX 1050/Radeon 7770, i know GTX 1050 is far better than Radeon 7770, 7770 just about HD 6850 performance. It should be GTX 1050 or Radeon RX 460/RX560 would be make sense because of same level performance both of them

MegaFalloutFan:

Bro what drugs are you on? 🙂 780Ti 3Gb was THE Top dog, 3Gb back then was HUGGGGE, it was the MOST expensive video card of that period. Same with GTX680, 2Gb was THE biggest amount of that period and 680 was the fastest card, GTX690 was dual GPU card

No, it wasn't. The 7970 was already out when the 680 came, which had 3gb vram. The titan came out shortly after the 680, which had 6gb vram... i cheaped out back then, but in the end i would have saved myself money by just buying titan sli when they launched, as i wouldn't have had to buy the 780 ti's then. Several games back then were severely limited by the 3gb vram at high resolutions - Assassins creed unity and watch dogs to name a few.

KingK76:

What!?!?! Buddy you have ZERO idea what you are talking about... There are quite a few native 4K titles (even 4K@60fps) on the XboxOneX... I own one and can tell you that first hand. Besides that, Digital Foundry analyzes each title that comes out enhanced for the PS4 Pro and the X1X and while the PS4 Pro rarely does native 4K the X1X does it quite often... You need to educate yourself before making such ignorant posts. And before you start throwing out the "console peasant" B.S... I own 4 gaming PC's... One in my "man-cave" one in my living room, one in my computer room and one in my bedroom... I have 3 kids and a wife who ALL game. My main PC is a i7 8700k@5.1GHz water-cooled with 16GBDDR4@3200MHz and a water-cooled Pascal TitanX... I built each system and have been into PC's and gaming since the 80's... I know what I'm talking about... Unlike you.

Then they must have details reduced a lot. Xbox one's/ps4's gpus are on level of, depending on source of info, hd7790/hd7850 which both are not capable of running games in 4k unless said games are some older titles or in case of new games details lowered to low, in best case mix of low and medium. I perfectly know what i'm talking about, i'm a PC gamer since very long time and i'm hardware enthusiast same long (over 20 years). If someone is trying to tell me consoles can do 4K then such person is lying or game has detail as low as it can be. On console 4K@60fps? Maybe mario kart but definitely nothing like for example ac origins or wolfenstein II new collosus which are demanding games and require a lot of hardware performance even on low settings, definitely much more than power of hd7790/7850.

RealNC:

So if the game runs at 4K on XBox X, then there's no "recommended" option for that on PC. That is just... weird.

4K on XBOX? LOL you mean dynamic resolution 30 fps.

spectatorx:

Then they must have details reduced a lot. Xbox one's/ps4's gpus are on level of, depending on source of info, hd7790/hd7850 which both are not capable of running games in 4k unless said games are some older titles or in case of new games details lowered to low, in best case mix of low and medium. I perfectly know what i'm talking about, i'm a PC gamer since very long time and i'm hardware enthusiast same long (over 20 years). If someone is trying to tell me consoles can do 4K then such person is lying or game has detail as low as it can be. On console 4K@60fps? Maybe mario kart but definitely nothing like for example ac origins or wolfenstein II new collosus which are demanding games and require a lot of hardware performance even on low settings, definitely much more than power of hd7790/7850.

The xbox one has a 1,2 tflops gpu, but the xbox one x has a 6 tflops gpu, which is somewhere inbetween a 1060 and a 1070. But yes, it usually runs 4k at 30 fps, and much reduced settings.

HardwareCaps:

4K on XBOX? LOL you mean dynamic resolution 30 fps.

Yeah. I'm not following consoles too closely. All I knew was that the X was supposed to be the 4K gaming machine, but turns out that's a blatant lie 😛 I fell for the marketing BS. That's the reason why I was confused seeing a 1060 as the "recommended" GPU. What kind of optimizations could they have achieved to get 4K running maxed out on a 1060.