NVIDIA Titan V Graphics Card Benchmarks

#5499489

Monchis

2017-12-09 15:04

Twice 1080 performance for 5.5 times the price... zzzz...

#5499493

jortego128

2017-12-09 15:34

To everyone saying this is not impressive, really? Yes, Pascal was an incredible jump over Maxwell, but Nvidia had a new process node to design for and some apparently serious architectual increases to Maxwells efficiency. With Volta, they are on essentially the same process node (really just a 16nm++), and have produced 40% gaming gains along with some serious AI/Deep Learning hardware, with almost the SAME power draw. Nvidia spoiled everyone with Pascal--dont think every gen is going double performance at same power draw. With Volta they have built the largest, most dense silicon die (CPU or GPU) in the history of mankind on this thing. It probably cost ~1000 to manufacture just one, and it has no competition, so yeah, they can charge $3K for it and people with buy it, so you bet your ass they will keep prices as high as possible as long as people continue to buy it. Also, while it more than doubles score of Vega 64 in Superposition, I noticed V64 loses to even a 1070-- are these results right, is Vega just very weak in Unigine 2???

#5499494

Stormyandcold

2017-12-09 15:39

This is basically a glimpse of what's to come. I understand the criticism here price-wise. However, considering the last version was $10,000+, then, prices are dropping fast and they must have solved part of their yield issues. I would be surprised if the consumer cards have tensor cores, though. I'm expecting a 200watt or under consumer card to come after this.

#5499501

Picolete

2017-12-09 16:27

This is a 800mm2 GPU, the **80 and **80Ti will have the tensor cores cut down, that alone should reduce the price a lot.

#5499526

semitope

2017-12-09 18:48

it is no longer acceptable to post benchmarks without including clock speed information. For all those other cards in the charts, you need to include what average clocks they were all running at for your tests. GPUs no longer have fixed clock speeds. These charts are often useless otherwise.

#5499533

fOrTy_7

2017-12-09 19:07

Looks promising. I can't wait to see xx80 and xx80Ti variants with GDDR5x or GDDR6. If they keep a trend +30% percent of performance to previous generation for mainstream gpus, I might upgrade my 2,5 year old card. 🙂 Also, I found a comparable 1080Ti results on the web and crunched some numbers. https://s2.postimg.org/stl2j1w6h/gpu_performance_compare.png Comparison for both cards running Superposition benchmark at 1080p resolution with Extreme settings. A user who uploaded results for 1080Ti said it was running OCed during the benchmark (source)

6700K @ 4.6GHz 1080ti FE with Accelero III cooler, 2000/5940 clocks during bench

#5499536

Nima V

2017-12-09 19:12

It's 54% faster than 1080ti. not bad considering it's clocked at just 1455mhz . I wonder if Volta can be overclocked to +2000 MHz like Pascal. this GPU at 2GHz will be a monster.

#5499537

BangTail

2017-12-09 19:12

Stevethegreat:

As expected pathetic results. I mean it was easily known that Volta will blow because nVidia decided to only add 40% more cuda cores at lower clock even. Predictably it's only 40 % faster, by comparison titan XP is almost 100% faster than titan Maxwell. Worst gaming release ever, followed by the highest price ever (why are titan cards suddenly 200% pricier, where they not pricy enough)? For compute even, buy 4 Tis for the same price, and blow this thing out of the water. Does nVidia aiming to commit financial suicide? Because I can see noone buying this, not even professionals.

Lucky for us it's not a 'gaming release' then isn't it 😉

#5499538

millibyte

2017-12-09 19:13

Noyce, I'll upgrade again once this power can be had in the 70/80 series.

#5499553

Robbo9999

2017-12-09 20:04

Not a particularly impressive increase in performance over the Titan Xp: 40% increase in performance. The die size of Titan V is 70% larger than that of Titan Xp, and I was gonna comment that this is a large increase in size for just the 40% increase in performance seen, but Titan V die size includes the HBM2 memory, whereas Titan Xp die size is just the GPU core (it has GDDR5x). Considering the Titan V is based on a process shrink (12nm vs 16nm) I was expecting to see bigger performance differences. On the plus side it might mean that Pascal will stay relevant for longer!

#5499577

blazngun

2017-12-09 22:57

Could AMD be preparing to announce a TitanXP killer solely designed for those types of tasks, and Nvidia rushed Volta out the door?

#5499580

Agent-A01

2017-12-09 23:14

DW75:

Wow, this price is just obscene. At the most, this card should be 1500. At 3000 bucks, no one should buy this. This is nothing more than a money grab from rich fanboys.

Are you dumb? This isn't a consumer product. It's a computational card that costs 7000 less than the Tesla V100 whose sole purpose is also computational tasks including AI.

#5499587

user1

2017-12-09 23:34

dude..... and to think its only running at 1200mhz-1500mhz~ i can only imagine how much performance you could get if you gave it more juice, could be looking at 20-30% more performance at higher tdps , absolutely crazy. Good to see nvidia putting out a full bore chip(with fp64 and all the bells and whistles) on the "consumer" market , its been a while, last one was the kepler titan black if i recall.

#5499623

sammarbella

2017-12-10 02:56

user1:

dude..... and to think its only running at 1200mhz-1500mhz~ i can only imagine how much performance you could get if you gave it more juice, could be looking at 20-30% more performance at higher tdps , absolutely crazy. Good to see nvidia putting out a full bore chip(with fp64 and all the bells and whistles) on the "consumer" market , its been a while, last one was the kepler titan black if i recall.

Meanwhile AMD: http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/le-miiverse-resource/images/c/c8/Lost.gif/revision/latest?cb=20150324230255

#5499643

Robbo9999

2017-12-10 06:40

user1:

dude..... and to think its only running at 1200mhz-1500mhz~ i can only imagine how much performance you could get if you gave it more juice, could be looking at 20-30% more performance at higher tdps , absolutely crazy. Good to see nvidia putting out a full bore chip(with fp64 and all the bells and whistles) on the "consumer" market , its been a while, last one was the kepler titan black if i recall.

True, but the Titan Xp card can also be overclocked & power slider increased (TDP), so I suppose it's best to compare like for like: either comparing stock to stock or overclocked to overclocked - probably the same ballpark 40% difference in performance between the two cards.

#5499652

D3Master

2017-12-10 07:34

Stevethegreat:

As expected pathetic results. I mean it was easily known that Volta will blow because nVidia decided to only add 40% more cuda cores at lower clock even. Predictably it's only 40 % faster, by comparison titan XP is almost 100% faster than titan Maxwell. Worst gaming release ever, followed by the highest price ever (why are titan cards suddenly 200% pricier, where they not pricy enough)? For compute even, buy 4 Tis for the same price, and blow this thing out of the water. Does nVidia aiming to commit financial suicide? Because I can see noone buying this, not even professionals.

This thing blows 4 Tis out of the water for DL applications with a quarter power consumption at more than twice the speed (probably more than 9 times as DL often requires optimization for multi GPUs), and DL makes up a large portion of compute market. It also has more than 4 times FP64 performance, and probably games better in most games (which are poorly optimized for 4 cards) if someone decides to game on one's workstation.

#5499660

fry178

2017-12-10 08:44

so now ppl are whining about the low gaming performance of a non-gaming card, and the higher cost of ~3K when just the chip alone is about 1000$. did you guys go to school and learn how business works in a capitalistic world? at least last time i checked , that's where we were...

#5499670