NVIDIA explains why it has removed Activision Blizzard Games from GeForce Now

Published by

Click here to post a comment for NVIDIA explains why it has removed Activision Blizzard Games from GeForce Now on our message forum
data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp
Actually last year there was a ruling against Steam who tried to prohibit the sale of digitized games .
"In other words, game ownership passes on to the buyer. ... Additionally, the French courts say that the description of Steam as a subscription service within the user agreement is counter to the nature of purchases on the platform. Users spend defined monetary amounts on single products in standalone transactions that grant access to the game forever, while subscription services (like the upcoming Apple Arcade) have a defined accessibility period and don’t imply ownership."
I would not be surprised to see a challenge against Activision regarding consumer rights to games bought by consumers.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273678.jpg
nobody cares what france does.
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
The same reason i flush the toilet ?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Another huge loss for geforce no.
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
Still don't get how publishers think they have the right how to tell me which hardware I use to play my games on. If I borrow a friend's laptop and play Overwatch on it, is that a copyright violation too? If I set up a cache proxy, like many companies do, is that a copyright violation? Makes no sense other than maybe these companies have connections to Google and Google isn't happy seeing a better service go live.
data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp
Nvidia's GeForce Now hits 1 million users after two weeks, pledges day-one Cyberpunk 2077 support
Mere weeks after GeForce Now’s formal launch, the company announced that over one million gamers have signed up to play their PC games anywhere, in stark contrast to Google Stadia’s disappointing user numbers. Google Stadia versus GeForce Now is a bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison. While both are cloud gaming services, Google Stadia feels like a console in the cloud, requiring you to buy games through its service, with only a few dozen currently available. Several promised features are still missing. GeForce Now, on the other hand, rents you a powerful gaming PC on Nvidia’s servers, and you bring your own games from existing PC storefronts like Steam, the Epic Games Store, and Uplay. The more important difference is in price. To use Google’s service, you currently need to pay $129 for a Stadia Premiere Edition, then you’ll probably want to pay $10 per month for a Stadia Pro subscription. GeForce Now, by contrast, offers a totally free tier, while the premium Founders subscription that unlocks longer play sessions and real-time ray tracing is currently in a 90-day free introductory period. You don’t need to pay anything to play GeForce Now at the moment, and it remains to be seen how many people will pay the $5 per month for a Founders subscription once the trial runs out.
https://www.pcworld.com/article/3528285/nvidias-geforce-now-hits-1-million-users-after-two-weeks-pledges-day-one-cyberpunk-2077-support.html