NVIDIA Demos Zero Latency Display Running at 1700Hz

Published by

Click here to post a comment for NVIDIA Demos Zero Latency Display Running at 1700Hz on our message forum
#5255880
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/169/169957.jpg
I still remember how bad coil whine was on 8800gtx when you launched Crysis and had to watch the stupid splash screens
#5255950
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
Knowing Nvidia, I'm wondering how much of a premium we will need to pay for this.
#5255986
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242134.jpg
@Denial +1 and the same with vram bandwidth, were everyone was complaining about bus, then the info about doubling GDDR5 bandwidth and so on. guess we will hear this until the cards are released/tested..
#5256002
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/187/187042.jpg
Wow but reaching 60 fps seems to be a struggle nowadays on high resolutions unless it's Quake 3 arena running at 1700fps :P. Monitor technology is great but we need more gpu power first over crazy refresh rates.
It's not about games run at 1700 fps. It's the monitor's refresh rate.
PR stunt to distract from the fact that Pascal's launch isn't going to be as smooth / early as the last generations due to various factors (dx12, HBM / GDDR5X, rumored missing chips themselves etc.)
Developing a 1.7 kHz display just for a PR stunt? Too much effort don't you think?
#5256065
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/244/244590.jpg
need practical and afforable tech for 90% of normal gpu n display user
#5256072
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
need practical and afforable tech for 90% of normal gpu n display user
That you already have. Because 90% of gamers have 1080p screen or one with lower resolution. And your GPU/CPU is kind of overkill. Because those with few exceptions are locked to 60Hz.

Previous Page