MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING X review

Graphics cards 1049 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING X review on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/275/275145.jpg
Asus is no example, extremely inflated brand, on both AMD and Nvidia cards. There are many good models of the GTX 1660 Super in Europe at 235€~245€.
data/avatar/default/avatar27.webp
is it my imagination or is Nvidia spamming new cards only to keep the headlines and battle AMD ? also because they don't want to replace their high-end car which is the only thing enthusiasts are interested in (interested in upgrading my 1080ti but scared of the price)
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/236/236670.jpg
kakiharaFRS:

is it my imagination or is Nvidia spamming new cards only to keep the headlines and battle AMD ? also because they don't want to replace their high-end car which is the only thing enthusiasts are interested in (interested in upgrading my 1080ti but scared of the price)
you don't need an upgrade^...IMO?
data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp
Hilbert, it looks like you forgot to change a reference to the Quadro RTX 8000 on page 5. Either that or the text in that section is written in a very confusing way.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/79/79740.jpg
High pricing for a brand new GPU just launched? Who would have thought... 🙄 Wait a few more weeks for stocks to accumulate at retailers before looking at pricing.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/90/90667.jpg
Not impressive in the slightest, in my opinion. They could drop 1660TI prices and make super version to replace the original TI instead of this.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156133.jpg
Moderator
Man if I were a 1660Ti owner I would not be too happy right about now...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
vbetts:

Man if I were a 1660Ti owner I would not be too happy right about now...
Or even a 1660 non super.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/275/275145.jpg
The market doesn´t stop, something better will always appear at the same or cheaper price. Look what also happened to the $700 Radeon VII, 5 months later the RX 5700XT comes out with almost the same performance for $250 less.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156133.jpg
Moderator
kings:

The market doesn´t stop, something better will always appear at the same or cheaper price. Look what also happened to the $700 Radeon VII, 5 months later the RX 5700XT comes out with almost the same performance for $250 less.
That's different. This is literally the same chip as the 1660, just with better memory. The original 1660 and Ti variants just seem like beta tested hardware. But also remember, the Radeon VII remains its own product for the high end and prosumer, while the 5700XT is tiered for gaming only with half the vram and no FP64
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/72/72485.jpg
vbetts:

Man if I were a 1660Ti owner I would not be too happy right about now...
I paid $279 for mine back in early March so I definitely feel I got my money's worth. Plus almost any of them can overclock near or at least 14 Gbps. I do agree though that having three cards all in the $200-$300 price range is too crowded. This card should basically end the production of the other two.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196284.jpg
vbetts:

Man if I were a 1660Ti owner I would not be too happy right about now...
While my 1660Ti wasn't in service long, I'm in the same position as jbscotchman. These cards are only slightly faster than a stock 1660Ti, and by "slightly", I mean less than 5% faster in most cases according to the few game charts I flipped through. That still leaves these cards on par or slightly slower than my MSI GTX1660Ti Ventus XS.
data/avatar/default/avatar08.webp
Thanks for all those reviews Team Guru3D. 🙂