Marvel is so played out and I don't think anyone cared about Youngblood in the first place. At least that's how I feel.

Haven't played Avengers but I heard it trailed off in terms of active player count though the developers seem to be confident but it sounds like the end-game is not quite there yet which seems like a common but still weird GAAS type of problem in games. Youngblood well the game just seemed like a weird mashup of ideas and even worse writing and humor than New Colossus and I personally disliked the two protagonists it could have worked but it feels like some stereotype take on what a caricature teenager would act like and just gets worse which made for a tedious experience playing through the game in addition to the gameplay tests on all kinds of odd half implemented mechanics. Doesn't even work well enough as a B movie exploitation works since those can still be a bit clever and interesting not just dumb. EDIT: It's nice with new features though, DLSS 2.1 actually getting updated and implemented in older titles is a plus on it's own just needs to see further usage and improvements in newer revisions of it. Though the big thing would be decoupling the game implementation entirely getting away from needing patches for these improvements and maybe a general solution that could just work but then without some training model and game implementation even if that's been streamlined the scaling would likely be...pretty bad put mildly. (Thought it could work pretty well but after some thinking I don't see a easy solution for making it entirely a stand-alone driver only type of controlled resolution+TAA mode.)

Yeah well, Nvidia with those developers tends to support alot of feminine games or games that doesn't give that much or has bad reviews etc... They also support games like Fortnite, minecraft etc. Which is mostly what kids play today because they know that kids's parents got the money. Clearly its about money all the time instead of giving DLSS support on alot other great titles.

Wouldn't NVIDIA make the most money if every game had DLSS?

If they could then yeah. Every single game scalable up to I think it's 4x and now even to 9x for image quality or performance or even a mix of both or through NVIDIA DSR. Mid-range GPU's would be viable for the newest games at higher settings or playable at decent performance with effects like ray tracing. Course when you can scale from as low as 320x240 up to 2880x2160 (x9 if that's how it works.) with a continually improved upon algorithm there's less need for that new GPU upgrade too at least not as quickly. (Though the mid range product range might be even more popular giving additional GPU functionality without the cost of the high end and enthusiast hardware with DLSS to retain excellent performance.) AMD would have a very hard time competing though until they can invest in a similar feature which is not a insignificant amount of resources and time if they don't already have something planned and even if there are further image quality trade-offs and more drawbacks the extreme GPU performance uplift would be worth it for a lot of users plus stuff like TV or streaming to other devices unlike a up-close computer display making these much less visible and you just get the higher performance. Far as I see it NVIDIA will push DLSS in every NVIDIA RTX ray-tracing game they can even as Ampere's new RTX cores has the potential to further mitigate the extreme GPU requirements that enabling these need. That and ray tracing isn't quite scaling with the display resolution but it frees up additional GPU resources as seen in current 2.0 and 2.1 examples with RTX effects especially games using multiple ones like Fortnite recently added. EDIT: Shift to 120 - 144 or higher refresh rate and matching performance could also be a position where DLSS excels upscaling the resolution instead of toggling settings or both to push up to 200 - 300 Hz and framerate target figures even as these new high-refresh rate displays become available on the consumer markets. Just speculating really, I can see a lot of uses for freeing up that GPU limit utilizing DLSS and as the technique continues to improve as NVIDIA develops it further this could be incredible effective. EDIT: But a generic implementation unless a per-profile database is built over time wouldn't have the advantage of training against a super-high resolution game specific model even as NVIDIA changed what 2.0 and later requires making it much simpler to implement and work into the game engine requiring I think only a method similar to what's used for temporal anti aliasing.

asturur:

The fact that people can call `humor` whatever tehywant, does not make it fun or humor or not offensive at all. That is the thing that some brains can't step up to understand. Sometimes this `humor` is just offending and hurting people with words and is a real pain, on real problems that because do not happen to you or to your strict circle of friends, does not mean this problems do not exists. When you joke about a sensible topic, in a forum, you are deliberately ignoring the fact that half of the readers could be affected by that topic and feel bad. Is this kind of attitude that needs to change, do not normalize some kind of stuff and everyone will feel better. People, any gender, need to be called out when they are jerks, and more people do it, and more advertisements remind it, the better will be. Do not frame this political, because isn't. This is normal education people should get at home.

Humor is subjective, whats funny for one is not for another, its a matter of Personal perception, you dont have to find something funny to understand that its humorous. [Like when someone tells a bad joke] Trough my eyes, everything that goes online is fake, unreal and meaningless, this is how I perceive the internet. [I mean non technical stuff, everything that goes between people] What someone "feels" or thinks is offensive or toxic is completely personal and if you got offended or you didn't was 100% your personal choice. The thing is, anything can be offensive to someone, i wont nor my kids live a life where we need to calculate everything that we say, because when you go this route there is no end, anything can be made offensive by people if they WANT to, even calling someone a Clown can be made offensive: people that work as Clowns will be "appalled and offended". If I was living the way you described, i would be taking prescription antidepressants from all the "emotional pain" I experienced since 1996 when i first started using the internet [Im half Jewish so i seen enough "hate" and keep seeing it every day] But I dont care. Because I understand that the Internet and the Real Life are two separate Worlds, and if people cant see this or cant separate the two worlds, its Their personal problem.