GeForce 552.22 WHQL driver download
Click here to post a comment for GeForce 552.22 WHQL driver download on our message forum
CPC_RedDawn
https://media2.giphy.com/media/TgOYjtgKpS9jAytUlh/200w.gif?cid=6c09b952wzf4f51zhqvadh4afqay1kwi5l2vf2xrwtlwt432&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=200w.gif&ct=g
now thats impressive. wish listed! 🙂
loracle
Driver is ok doing the job 🙂
call of duty bops 3 multi 😯k
Efootball 2024 😯k
The Callisto protocol 😯k
Benches, Superposition and Novabench: a small lost of performance, like 2-3 fps in games, within the margin !!!
Klemc
https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/long-time-linux-nouveau-driver-chief-ben-skeggs-joins-nvidia.321646/
Ben Skeggs Joins NVIDIA
KissSh0t
Maybe Nvidia is wanting to make a console that uses Linux like Valve's Steam Deck?
aufkrawall2
Would make a great console without a CPU.
dr_rus
That would be the opposite of what one would want from hiring an open source driver developer.
It would also be completely uninteresting for Nvidia to pursue.
Exostenza
Nvidia makes the APU that powers the Switch so why couldn't they just scale that up? I don't think the tech would be an issue for Nvidia. I think the margins are the issue and while making insane margins on enterprise technologies why would they care more than just powering the Switch 2? I don't think they do. Leave the small margin sales to AMD I am sure is their attitude.
Conan The Barbarian
Red Dead 2 with these drivers. 1440p 60fps should be fully buffered by now.
[youtube=bUkYmws299M]
aufkrawall2
It wouldn't be able to compete with x86 handhelds with ARM emulation. And even with native ARM apps it might look poor vs. Zen 4 if they used some in-house ARM design, so they'd need to license something. And a mere streaming handheld would be superflous AF too, you can instead just connect a BT controller to any smartphone or tablet instead.
Conan The Barbarian
And Cyberpunk results. Damn I love this GPU, it's a beast!
[youtube=xcJuEXrvCFk]
CPC_RedDawn
Test RDR2 with DX12 instead. When RDR2 was released VK did perform better but since then VK in the game has seen little to no updates and fixes while DX12 has been very much improved.
Conan The Barbarian
I totally forgot about DX12. It's good, but Vulkan does a little better for me and the difference is very minor.
[youtube=pkVFTH45MBA]
Macer
RDR2 Vulkan v.s DirectX 12 - NVIDIA 552.22 driver
[youtube=GIjCLxdpYCM]
RealNC
And it's still slower than Vulkan.
CPC_RedDawn
More like...
https://media1.giphy.com/media/emHLVl0fhGgGbiHg9z/200w.gif?cid=6c09b952lq2l7iftc3mfy114lz097wuiq29ez9yqh9l1g9x2&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=200w.gif&ct=g
not for me, i get around 5-10 more average fps in DX12 compared to VK (VK is basically a tie with .1 lows, etc). At launch it was the other way around but the issue was VK crashed a lot but that has been fixed with driver updates.
dr_rus
Depends on your system really. It's not universally slower.
RealNC
I guess it depends on the CPU. Slower CPUs seem to prefer Vulkan, at least on Nvidia. The ridiculous perf gap (~40%) between Vulkan and GL in Doom 4 almost disappeared when I went from i5 2500K to Ryzen 3700X.
In RDR2, I get better perf with Vulkan, but apparently people with more modern/faster CPUs don't seem to.
aufkrawall2
I tested this across several CPUs and GPUs (well, not RDNA3 yet, at least not Vk vs. D3D12) and the result was always like in Macer's video above: DX12 slower and more stuttery.
Exostenza
My point was just that I doubt the ability to make a CPU is what's holding back Nvidia from wanting to be a major player in the console / handheld market. I think the much more likely explanation is that there isn't enough profit in it and while Nvidia is making money hand over fist supplying the ML boom it's unlikely that they are interested in entering the console / handheld market further than just supplying the chips for the Switch 2.
Passus
For Engines which were built with DX12 then it is fine but older engines had it patched in and those tended to have huge frametime issues
These drivers are another great set, playing various games fine
