#4989788

Holm

2015-01-08 22:39

I got 8856 with my R7870 in the ranking mod, not that bad i think

#4989792

ruiner13

2015-01-08 22:45

My first try. Cards not OCed and running at stocks. Scored 21629 @ 1920x1080, 4xMSAA. http://i57.tinypic.com/mwzmep.jpg

#4989802

-Tj-

2015-01-08 23:16

I see a moderate Oc'ed 780GTX is still going strong 🙂

#4989822

BLEH!

2015-01-08 23:39

Take it this only works on nVidia cards...?

#4989824

Dorlor

2015-01-08 23:39

Tried the test aswell Ranking mode http://i.imgur.com/CgVr5TH.jpg Hunter mode http://i.imgur.com/r9xi6yz.jpg

#4989831

---TK---

2015-01-08 23:51

16,800ish 1440p maxed out hunting mode, ranking mode 29,784 1150/7516 780ti sli 2600k @4.6ghz

#4989834

looniam

2015-01-08 23:52

its . . .different. though didn't seem to see that much cpu being used. https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-vKq4Y0aR-eo/VK8JI40rIII/AAAAAAAAAW8/J0TziJ97ufk/w1142-h663-no/Capture.JPG oh yeah 780TI classy @ 1176 and 4.6ghz on the i7.

#4989838

Dorlor

2015-01-08 23:55

its . . .different. though didn't seem to see that much cpu being used. oh yeah 780TI classy @ 1176 and 4.6ghz on the i7.

If you do the ranking test, instead of the hunter test, youll see the cpu being used quite a bit more, due to the lower resolution 🙂

#4989840

Esagerao

2015-01-08 23:59

First run https://www.imageshack.us/i/hjIz22iyj

#4989844

orpheus

2015-01-09 00:03

why do these things never tell you you're real clock speed, mine set at 4.4ghz titans left at stock clock, and fairly happy with the results.....hehe 🙂 https://scontent-b-lhr.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/t31.0-8/10827946_10152952989015891_4654116528903106473_o.jpg

#4989860

HeavyHemi

2015-01-09 00:35

Many benches seem to read the bclk times the multi or equivalent... http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b96/Heavyhemi/Computer/MonsterHunterBench_zps3cef5f3a.jpg

#4989868

looniam

2015-01-09 00:45

If you do the ranking test, instead of the hunter test, youll see the cpu being used quite a bit more, due to the lower resolution 🙂

good point!

#4989870

GeniusPr0

2015-01-09 00:46

CPU @ 4.5Ghz VCCIN 1.8v GPU @ 200/460 (1490 boosted cores) DDR4 @ 2400/5-5-5-15 http://i.imgur.com/F8U1dPb.jpg

#4989872

Redemption80

2015-01-09 00:48

I don't think any of Capcom's benchmarks have ever shown the correct clock speed. A pity this isn't something i like as it looks nice visually and performs really well for me providing i use SMAA. The music at the keeps making me think Superman though.

#4989877

Rich_Guy

2015-01-09 01:04

Take it this only works on nVidia cards...?

Nope, AMDs as well.

#4989882

BLEH!

2015-01-09 01:18

Nope, AMDs as well.

Tried downloading, installer is corrupted.

#4989884

looniam

2015-01-09 01:24

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-wedy-LANfwg/VK8byip7jKI/AAAAAAAAAX4/qL2dnEgRkQw/w943-h544-no/Capture.JPG 780ti@1174 like a crytek game, it dosen't like my overclocking . . . :banana:

#4989891

Dorlor

2015-01-09 01:40

CPU @ 4.5Ghz VCCIN 1.8v GPU @ 200/460 (1490 boosted cores) DDR4 @ 2400/5-5-5-15 http://i.imgur.com/F8U1dPb.jpg

What was your highest fps ? i saw mine reach a bit over 500, so im guessing yours would have reached 700 or something like that :P

#4989919

GeniusPr0

2015-01-09 03:17

Ill rerun and check later

#4989948

Dazz

2015-01-09 06:00

Take it this only works on nVidia cards...?

It works on both nVidia and AMD cards but the benchmark is incredibly bias towards nVidia cards. Fur kills performance on AMD cards cause it is being calculated by the CPU rather then the GPU since it it done using Cuda, if it was done using OpenCL then it would work equally well on either manufactures cards. Yep my minimum frame rate is the same no matter the resolution or if a have FSAA on or off, it always slows down when rendering fur or water refractions. As such this benchmark holds no water and reflects no equal ground, nVidia paid product.