7950/7970/280/280x/380/380x (Possibly 270/270x/285?) are all plagued with stability issues - they become severe with Windows 10 14353. Even on a system with a legacy install, and no secure boot, they still crash under load. It can be Google Chrome, madVR, Rainbow Six Siege, whatever. BSODs, amd kernel dll faults, application crashes and driver crashes. And clocks are still stuck. :bang: I've seen these problems on the newer drivers on many people's computers now. A GTX 970 is the perfect solution. They're only about $170-190 on hardwareswap now. Massively reduced CPU overhead, massively reduced power consumption and heat output. (Seriously, my ITX rig now idles at 30w instead of 90w+. Gaming load is 230w peak vs 460w peak). I'd love nothing more than for this to get fixed, but I don't have faith that it will, in fact. I don't even think it's on AMD's radar. If they paid attention and actually tested their drivers themselves, they'd find all sorts of bugs and silly limitations. Having to use CRU to create a custom resolution with AMD drivers but not Nvidia drivers is another example. Why are these problems ignored?

7950/7970/280/280x/380/380x (Possibly 270/270x/285?) are all plagued with stability issues - they become severe with Windows 10 14353. Even on a system with a legacy install, and no secure boot, they still crash under load. It can be Google Chrome, madVR, Rainbow Six Siege, whatever. BSODs, amd kernel dll faults, application crashes and driver crashes. And clocks are still stuck. :bang: I've seen these problems on the newer drivers on many people's computers now. A GTX 970 is the perfect solution. They're only about $170-190 on hardwareswap now. Massively reduced CPU overhead, massively reduced power consumption and heat output. (Seriously, my ITX rig now idles at 30w instead of 90w+. Gaming load is 230w peak vs 460w peak). I'd love nothing more than for this to get fixed, but I don't have faith that it will, in fact. I don't even think it's on AMD's radar. If they paid attention and actually tested their drivers themselves, they'd find all sorts of bugs and silly limitations. Having to use CRU to create a custom resolution with AMD drivers but not Nvidia drivers is another example. Why are these problems ignored?

Please use the report form also, one day they might wake up and do something about. For some reason, I can't report under Chrome (stuck at loading animation), but it's OK in IE.

cookieboyeli 7950/7970/280/280x/380/380x (Possibly 270/270x/285?) are all plagued with stability issues - they become severe with Windows 10 14353. Even on a system with a legacy install, and no secure boot, they still crash under load. It can be Google Chrome, madVR, Rainbow Six Siege, whatever. BSODs, amd kernel dll faults, application crashes and driver crashes. And clocks are still stuck. I've seen these problems on the newer drivers on many people's computers now. A GTX 970 is the perfect solution. They're only about $170-190 on hardwareswap now. Massively reduced CPU overhead, massively reduced power consumption and heat output. (Seriously, my ITX rig now idles at 30w instead of 90w+. Gaming load is 230w peak vs 460w peak).

The 290 has major stability issues, too. It's frustrating as hell. I can play for hours on it, but I browse Chrome or if I leave the system idle with no windows open, it will crash.

This game's based on Unreal Engine 4, does this come as a surprise to you?

In Gow4 1060/970 is faster than furyX/fury/390x/480. Pathetic AMD. Dx12 my @$$ :bang:

Even if years coming and passing by, the red team is unable to overcome such obstacles. That's not competiting. OpenGl, Tessellation, UE etc. I am bored.

If I had such a bottlenecked system, I'd be bored too.

Wth are you guys talking about. AMD does fine in GoW4 considering UE4 favors the nvidia cards : http://gamegpu.com/images/stories/Test_GPU/Action/Gears_of_War_4/gw4_1920.png

Deleted