8K? On 32 inch? Useless. And I don't buy this "media editing"... at 8K it is impossible to edit anything without using huge magnification, up to the point when visible "pixels" size is the same as on any 1080p screen. And using 8K on 32 inch just to "appreciate" the final result is plain stupid, and actually still useless, because at such tiny pixels it is almost impossible to see the difference with smaller resolution version.

You can't just arbitrarily decide something is useless because you have decided that no one can see pixels at that resolution. 8K @ 32" is the same pixel density as 4K @ 16". I'm typing this response from a 4K @ 15.6" laptop and I can still see the pixels, quite clearly too. Lines are smoother than ever but aren't completely smooth, aliasing still exists. Take this up a notch or seven for color-critical, high-resolution photography work or content creation, and you'd probably want more than 8K at 32" even, right up until aliasing is truly invisible (not even 16K will do).

All that res and stuck at 60hz. I know we wont get near shifting pixels at a decent framerate on this for a while but to think itll still look like a juddering mess at its hz limit is a shame. This is not a gaming monitor. 60hz gaming is borderline peasantry in space year 2017 .

This is not a gaming monitor ... Not everything has to do with gaming.

Obviously this is a workstation monitor. What we gamers can get excited about is that this tech will eventually filter to the mainstream and then into the gaming arena with high framerates.

I can imagine this being great for those filmmakers running Red Epic 8k Cameras, I have built few workstations recently for filmmakers needing a system to drive 8k footage, Monitor like this would go hand in hand.