Corona CPU Benchmark Download - Comments (Page 2)

primetime^

2016-03-12 23:02

lol they guys in first place have dual XEON E5-2686 V3 (thats 36 cores for both) Retail around $3,650.00 each or 950 each for Engineering sample's Speedys cpus by themselves cost over 7k new....god only knows how much the hole pc cost to make? cpus alone cost more than my truck did. People like that have special insurance just for there pc?:)

#5244327

Arctucas

2016-03-13 00:35

Maybe it needs said connection to register itself, disable whatever blocking software you're using and give it another shot? Seems to work fine for everyone else, there is no install, just run the exe and it auto starts the benchmark

Third times the charm, I guess: http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/ll305/Arctucas/corona%20bench%203-12-16.jpg

#5244476

Ch0plol

2016-03-13 13:34

i5 3570k @ 4.3 8GB 2400MHz RAM Windows 10 x64 Pro https://i.imgur.com/fAhwGWp.jpg

#5244478

Extraordinary

2016-03-13 13:51

Third times the charm, I guess:

Nice one

#5244678

BLEH!

2016-03-13 23:45

W3680 @ 4GHz: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU W3680 @ 3.33GHz Time: 0:03:38, Rays/sec: 2,230,730

#5244822

Lilith

2016-03-14 11:00

I thought I would give this a go. I have a Intel i5 4690k that I have set to 4.6GHz max. With a bit of help from my bf this is my first overclock. It's been stable for about 4mths now. Bit jealous of some of these i7 scores tho 🙂 https://sc-cdn.scaleengine.net/i/67614ddfc573dd60e06fbcebdba369144.png

#5246277

Sir Galahad

2016-03-16 20:43

It's crazy how well optimised this is for hyper threading. My 4690K @ 4.5 GHz got 1,421,760 My Q9650 @ 4.0 Ghz got 934,828 But my i7 870 @ 4.0 GHz got a whopping 1,564,660!! The i7 870 can sometimes out perform the 4690k when the i7 is overclocked and the i5 is at stock but never when they are both overclocked. I've also never seen a Nehalem outperform a Core 2 Quad buy such a wide margin before, this is mad: http://i1115.photobucket.com/albums/k554/James_Michael_McGrath/Untitled_zpswqh8yxqb.jpg

#5246923

newls1

2016-03-17 23:47

Here are my results using 5930K @ 4.5GHz... Not really sure how to read the results and or what they mean, but here you go.. Are my results any good?? http://i675.photobucket.com/albums/vv113/newls1/corona_zpsrwsc1j60.png

#5249093

nz3777

2016-03-23 13:07

How does this work>? The lower your render time is the better right? Rays/sec the higher the better correct? I wonder how my 4790k would do on this? Does memory speed impact the score on this benchmark? I am only running 1600mhz for now.

#5249210

A M D BugBear

2016-03-23 17:31

Heres mine: http://i66.tinypic.com/2w3yut0.jpg

#5250197

seaplane pilot

2016-03-26 03:25

1 second left to finish the bench. :infinity: New 5930k @ 4.5GHz testing. --------------------------- Corona 1.3 Benchmark Error --------------------------- Could not run Corona 1.3 Benchmark: Application exited with errors. (Press Ctrl + C to copy the message to clipboard.) --------------------------- OK --------------------------- Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished BTR Scene 16 passes Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5930K CPU @ 3.50GHz Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 4.4 (actually 4.5) Render Time: 0:02:40, Rays/sec: 3,025,940

#5250199

seaplane pilot

2016-03-26 03:36

BTR Scene 16 passes Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5930K CPU @ 3.50GHz Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 4.5 Render Time: 0:02:40, Rays/sec: 3,025,510

#5250228

seaplane pilot

2016-03-26 08:09

Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished BTR Scene 16 passes Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5930K CPU @ 3.50GHz Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 4.7 Render Time: 0:02:35, Rays/sec: 3,117,450 ----------------------- Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished BTR Scene 16 passes Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5930K CPU @ 3.50GHz Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 4.7 Render Time: 0:02:32, Rays/sec: 3,196,990

#5250697

seaplane pilot

2016-03-28 02:45

5930k@4.7GHz@1.332v/3.5GHz cache / 32GB 2666MHz DDR4@1.20v First run of new 5930k landed me the #16 position 5930k category. Fine tuning now, I think she is a keeper & has completed into the #4 position searched 5930k. :infinity: http://img.techpowerup.org/160328/5930k-4-7ghz-2666mhz948.jpg

#5251374

AMD4Life

2016-03-29 17:48

Finally decided to give Corona a run: http://i66.tinypic.com/30avogg.png

#5261001

A M D BugBear

2016-04-21 00:57

Heres my newest update score: Hope you all like it: http://i67.tinypic.com/2prtpbl.jpg Disregard where it says 2.8ghz, its really 2.9ghz flat.

#5261018

Undying

2016-04-21 01:39

Thats insane, BugBear. What a multithreaded beast.

#5261085

HeavyHemi

2016-04-21 06:39

Could be worse I guess.. Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished BTR Scene 16 passes Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU X 980 @ 3.33GHz Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 4.2 Render Time: 0:03:32, Rays/sec: 2,288,630

#5288944

jura11

2016-06-13 22:05

Here is mine http://oi64.tinypic.com/2duyozo.jpg Actual speed is 2.38GHz(BCLK OC 103.3MHz) Thanks,Jura