Core i9 10990XE processor spotted, has 22 cores and 44 threads.

nizzen

2020-01-13 20:53

kanenas:

You are on a dead platform next Amd desktop cpu will make your HEDT old and slow but as always enjoy your system. Sry for grammar.

Well it's over 2 years old, but it can't be dead when it's working pretty well 😉

#5750399

nizzen

2020-01-13 20:57

neikosr0x:

I don't know rick lol, a 3950x stock would just kick that CPU ass. And doing CCX OC at 4.45 and 4.35 ghz while costing less and having 2 cores less it would say HI to your CPU s**t on it hahahaha:D while also using less power and costing waaaayyyyyyy less not to mention one is a Mainstream CPU and yours is a HDTE cpu. You basically doing everything you can to get the most of that CPU while these ryzen will do it with no extra crap like that where you can actually frack your CPU xD oh and at same clocks or stock the 3900x or 3950 would have better single core performance. so yea your cpu is obsolete

So do you want to compare in some benchmarks? Bring it on 🙂 I have 3900x too, so you don't need to post 3900x benchmarks 😉 Post some gamebenchmarks, and I will try to beat them. Are you ready? Something tells me you don't want to 😛 PS: For me with 2080ti I didn't fond a game yet that is faster on my overclocked 3900x. 3800c16 memory on 3900x too. Strange? I don't think so. Pleace help me find something else than boring Cinebench to benchmark... I'm not at fanboy of any brand or color. I'm a performancefanboy 😀 Not testet TRX yet, but it looks like the performance is behind my overclocked 7980xe in most scenarios but pure rendering due to more cores on TRX.

#5750400

nizzen

2020-01-13 21:02

Reddoguk:

Well it's an amazing CPU that also works as a heater for your house.

Perfect here in Norway 😀 My 4 computers do most of the heating in my house. F@H loves gpu's and cores, so does the cold climate here 😀

#5750402

Robbo9999

2020-01-13 21:17

nizzen:

Perfect here in Norway 😀 My 4 computers do most of the heating in my house. F@H loves gpu's and cores, so does the cold climate here 😀

Just a bit of curiosity here on my part...do you know if heating your home with computers is efficient in terms of electricity in vs heat thrown out, when compared to conventional electrical heaters. I mean obviously you're actually getting some number crunching done at the same time which is a bonus, but I'm talking about the actual amount of electricity in vs the amount of heat thrown out....is it any less efficient at that conversion of energy than regular electrical heaters? If PC heating is just as efficient as regular heating then I may turn my heating down a bit and crunch some numbers for a good cause.

#5750407

Biffo

2020-01-13 21:32

Another high priced room heater from Intel.

#5750427

Kool64

2020-01-13 22:55

asturur:

Also LOL at mainstream 3900x for 500$. Mainstream? mainstream is the 3600x, 3700x. All the rest is top notch stuff for people with enough money to have fun.

I wouln't call $500 mainstream but it's certainly "enthusiast mainstream" Otherwise you'd have to take into account that the 9900K(SF) isn't mainstream when it;s the ONLY chip the Intel fans care about because "it's the king" and everyone seems to have one.

#5750428

nizzen

2020-01-13 22:57

It's confirmed fake, so whatever...

#5750435

D3M1G0D

2020-01-13 23:32

nizzen:

Well it's over 2 years old, but it can't be dead when it's working pretty well 😉

My 1950X is about two years old but I consider it basically dead. My 3950X outperforms it by a whopping 30% in grid computing with 50 watts less. Technology moves fast, and two year old technology is basically ancient. :P

#5750437

Undying

2020-01-13 23:50

D3M1G0D:

My 1950X is about two years old but I consider it basically dead. My 3950X outperforms it by a whopping 30% in grid computing with 50 watts less. Technology moves fast, and two year old technology is basically ancient. 😛

If we ware back in 2010's that would be true but today not so much. 1950x is still vastly superior to many cpus today. I would even dare to say its a 16c/32t beast. 😉

#5750439

nizzen

2020-01-14 00:04

D3M1G0D:

My 1950X is about two years old but I consider it basically dead. My 3950X outperforms it by a whopping 30% in grid computing with 50 watts less. Technology moves fast, and two year old technology is basically ancient. 😛

I have 1950x too in my ubuntu server. I'm not happy that Threadripper gen 3 not working with x399 🙁 7980xe is still top performer, 1950x not so much compared to 3950x. Even my 3900x beats 1950x in everything exept programs that like quad channel memory 😛 3600c16 memory works with my 1950x, so that is nice. Pretty crazy that an ancient cpu like 7980xe still kicking ass with enough cooling; Read delidded and custom watercooling 😛

#5750454

Terradorvite

2020-01-14 01:52

nizzen:

I have 1950x too in my ubuntu server. I'm not happy that Threadripper gen 3 not working with x399 🙁 7980xe is still top performer, 1950x not so much compared to 3950x. Even my 3900x beats 1950x in everything exept programs that like quad channel memory 😛 3600c16 memory works with my 1950x, so that is nice. Pretty crazy that an ancient cpu like 7980xe still kicking ass with enough cooling; Read delidded and custom watercooling 😛

Can you push it to 4.9ghz? 845watts is beyond insane. Still though it IS impressive performance and overclocking potential for an older system.

#5750460

EspHack

2020-01-14 02:23

would be kinda funny if true, reminds me of AMDs 5ghz watercooled FX heater, how the tales have turned...

#5750463

kakiharaFRS

2020-01-14 02:31

3960x 24 cores real-life aida64 values running cinebenchR20 multi-threaded stock 280Watts pbo mode 315Watts auto-oc ryzen master 347Watts not only I managed to make it draw 840Watt in my HX1200i PSU but I actually upgraded to custom watercooling from an AIO because it couldn't manage the heat (90°->76°C) even with a 55mm thick rad D5 pump etc...the idle is still at 50+°C which means the rad is constantly outputing heat unlike for example a 9900k which is cold at idle (something Intel are better than AMD) air cooling ahahah that's a good one NH-U9 TR4-SP3 : Max TDP 180W, no overclocking (not 250W TDP compatible) be quiet! Dark Rock Pro TR4 : Max TDP 250W

#5750478

RavenMaster

2020-01-14 04:33

I won't upgrade until i see some real cool features get introduced. Like DDR5 and PCI-E 4.0 on a new chipset. So probs Tiger Lake-S

#5750480

Undying

2020-01-14 04:40

karma777police:

Anything more than 8 cores on Ryzen is not cool by any means and draws lot of power. Anyways 2066 socket platform can handle up to 28 cores CPU.

Yeah, that 64c TR have some crazy power draws, almost big as 22c Intel chip. 😀

#5750520

Fediuld

2020-01-14 09:10

asturur:

Also LOL at mainstream 3900x for 500$. Mainstream? mainstream is the 3600x, 3700x. All the rest is top notch stuff for people with enough money to have fun.

So the $500 9900K and $650 9900KS aren't mainstream either yes?

#5750523

Fediuld

2020-01-14 09:12

D3M1G0D:

I seriously hope this isn't the real product - 380 watt TDP FFS! This is especially worrying since Intel advertises the TDP based on the base clock. What's the turbo TDP? 500W? Is this really the best that Intel can do to counter (the 280 watt peak usage) Threadripper?

Undying:

Intel is fighting with what they have even its abomination that pulls 500W with some extreme cooling. Its sad where they end up to.

1000W guys as per original article from computerbase. 10980XE burns 700W at manual overclocks. 😀 And it would still be slower than the 3960X...

#5750526

Misternikitas

2020-01-14 09:22

D1stRU3T0R:

https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i9-7980XE-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-3800X/m352013vs4047 3800X is running circles around your CPU, even the 3600 seems better (yea xd userbenchmark ... xd) Let's be honest, your CPU is not better than the 3950X in almost any world and word

Don't ever use that shitty site please. Just compare an i3 9100 and the i9 9900. They have prioritized single core performance to the point where multicore doesn't count at all.

#5750529

asturur

2020-01-14 09:26

Fediuld:

So the $500 9900K and $650 9900KS aren't mainstream either yes?

No they are not. Mainstream is not just required chipset. Is the whole system. you do not run a 500$ cpu with a 30$ cooler and 50$ memories. Mainstream would be the cpu that people buy most in the diy build or pre made computers. The one that is mainly in computer. Now do not tell me that because there are 2000$ cpus everyone has a 9900k or a 3900x because they are just 500$.

#5750530

Misternikitas

2020-01-14 09:27

Fediuld:

So the $500 9900K and $650 9900KS aren't mainstream either yes?

It is not called mainstream based on its price, but for its usage/purpose.