AMD TressFX Featured in Tomb Raider: Lara Croft Reborn

Published by

Click here to post a comment for AMD TressFX Featured in Tomb Raider: Lara Croft Reborn on our message forum
#4538514
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/93/93080.jpg
"TressFX" - I will get maybe good fps on my GTX 480 because I think that GTX 480 is faster or slower than HD 7970* at extreme/insane (hair tessellated) tessellation (eg: Tessmark 0.3.0). 😉 * - attention to ATi-AMD Optimized Tesselation (enabled is (much) faster than disabled/original but enabled is lower polygons.)
Bro your GTX 480 isn't faster than the HD 7970 in anything I'm afraid other than Physx, as AMD doesn't support Nvidia Physx. 🙂 Plus this game is optimized on AMD cards, specifically the HD 7 series. So I'm sure there will be an advantage for AMD to some degree.
#4538516
data/avatar/default/avatar13.webp
Am I the only one here that doesn't care about hair?
nope, i mostly care about tits and ass too. But here we are speaking about graphics, and every improvement it's welcome.
#4538522
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/89/89478.jpg
Bro your GTX 480 isn't faster than the HD 7970 in anything I'm afraid other than Physx, as AMD doesn't support Nvidia Physx. 🙂 Plus this game is optimized on AMD cards, specifically the HD 7 series. So I'm sure there will be an advantage for AMD to some degree.
Exactly, if the recent specs that got released are to be believed (and they haven't adjusted them) then the NVidia optimization is going to be terrible. They've listed the recommended cards as HD 5850s and a GTX 480s, with the GTX 480 being in a different league and it being placed along side an HD 5850 it doesn't bode well for NVidia. (This stands even if you change the card to an HD 6850).
#4538525
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/89/89478.jpg
So funny to have a new effect like this and AMD/ATI only gives us screenshots, this is something that needs to be watched in motion. :bang:
#4538582
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
Wow AMD deserves a gold star for introducing new technology and not hoarding it for them selves or making people pay a licencing fee. Tops to that man! I don't want an argument for this it's just a point that has to be made.
#4538597
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/164/164033.jpg
Well i like the fact that water, wind and other conditions affect the hair <3
#4538687
data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp
Nvidia can definitely do this tech and nvidia was the first one to demo Realistic Hair back in 2010. Nvidia Hair Tessalation, this looks more natural and realistic physics Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7s7UyAVbmU
#4538702
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/214/214099.jpg
Looks decent from the screens but not worth more than 3-5 fps tops.
#4538706
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/137/137601.jpg
Nvidia Hair Tessalation, this looks... realistic physics
Not true because see my post. 🙁 😉
#4538707
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/113/113386.jpg
Another stupid gpu exclusive feature...
#4538711
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/215/215966.jpg
They look amazing ! Im glad to have amds now woohoo. Well, I expect Nvidia to launch something similar in a few days if not today haha.
#4538716
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/236/236670.jpg
Lmao^..............
#4538726
data/avatar/default/avatar21.webp
Cool. I really love stuff like this. In games like RPGs where character customization is a popular feature, realistic hair would be welcome.
#4538728
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
"TressFX" - I will get maybe good fps on my GTX 480 because I think that GTX 480 is faster or slower than HD 7970* at extreme/insane (hair tessellated) tessellation (eg: Tessmark 0.3.0). 😉 * - attention to ATi-AMD Optimized Tesselation (enabled is (much) faster than disabled/original but enabled is lower polygons.)
480GTX ~ 1.3tflops 7970 ~ 4tflops My OC'ed 570GTX has ~ 1.8 - 2tflops, i think gotta re-run sisoft Sandra. Imo its using very little tessellation for it, mostly direct compute power. 🙂 EDIT: at 950MHZ its 1.82tflops SP or 347Gflops DP (680GTX has 202Gflops DP) @ Year lmao 😀
#4538731
data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp
480GTX ~ 1.3tflops 7970 ~ 4tflops My OC'ed 570GTX has ~ 1.8 - 2tflops @ Year lmao 😀
And dont forget DP... as it is DXcompute based.. Anyway more screen in high resolution from Eidos. http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_7euhy.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_l9uvq.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_uvu5q.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_53u2p.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_5gufh.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_uku1i.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_bjulw.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_wbuhr.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_d1ueu.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_9luh7.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_a2urf.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_mqu9v.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_2butd.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_mvuz7.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/tr9_conceptart_v1_tr_pfuct.jpg http://forums.eidosgames.com/showpos...&postcount=256 Anyway, on an Old demo released in 2011 by Square Visual Works, you see what look to be TressFX in movement ( this not appear on the E3 demo ) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN7_8Yholm4&feature=player_embedded#at=145
#4538737
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
^ Yes, but i think it wont use DP, just SP. At least that's why some NV representive said, no game uses DP yet, he could be wrong though xD. Btw what's AMD 7970 DP? Titan has ~ 1.3tflops if im not mistaken, GK104 uses less then GF100/110. And thanks nice screens, looks epic! I already pre-ordered retail, Can't wait. 🙂
#4538744
data/avatar/default/avatar09.webp
^ Yes, but i think it wont use DP, just SP. At least that's why some NV representive said, no game uses DP yet, he could be wrong though xD. Btw what's AMD 7970 DP? Titan has ~ 1.3tflops if im not mistaken, GK104 uses less then GF100/110. And thanks nice screens, looks epic! Can't wait. 🙂
Clearly, i dont know if this type of DirectCompute use FP64 or not ( dont think so ) Ofc Titan have more DP available. 7970 have 1.0 Tflops DP at 1:4 rate. Titan have 1.3Tflops at 1:3 rate ( for 4.5Tflops SP.. clock speed is a lot lower on FP64 mode hence why it is only 1.3Tflops. )

Previous Page

Next Page