AMD Ryzen 7 2700X review
Click here to post a comment for AMD Ryzen 7 2700X review on our message forum
Fox2232
alanm
Nice review! And nice to see AMD back on top on the CPU front. Even in gaming, the differences are not that great vs 8700k. Non-issue for high res gaming. Overall a killer chip at a killer price. Quite refreshing to see poor, cash-strapped AMD taking on Intel with its multi-billion $ R&D budget and handing their ass to them on a plate 😀. Just wish they could do the same to Nvidia on the GPU front. Then it would be back to the good old days of intense rivalry and price wars and more interesting times.
BLEH!
Looks promising. Nealy matching the 7900X in performance. Not sure how intel can continue to justify their pricing...
Noisiv
Hilbert,
page 30, Conclusion
Value for money, Cents per CB chart:
You are using old EU prices for Coffee Lake (8700k = 389 euro, $420), while using current US prices for Zen+ (2700X = $329)
RzrTrek
Looks good, but I will wait for the price to drop.
Fox2232
Endymion
Nice. If some samples can hit 4500Ghz and have more friendly time with RAM I would consider change my 1700 4.1Ghz with 3200 RAM to 2700. (or X)
The Reeferman
I wouldn't be surprised if the Ryzen 2700x @ 4.4GHz beats the intel at minimum FPS with their quad and hexa-core procs in most games. It might need RAM speeds around 3500MHz for it. But I remember a dude on a forum with a Ryzen 1800x @ 4,1GHz and 3500Mhz RAM that showed that it was already the case with some games. Better(higher) low fps
RzrTrek
asturur
No my question was more about if 4 DIMMS ( 8 x 4 in 2 kits of 16 ) are as good as only 2 Dimms for speed.
I was waiting a review for the new computer and i am here itchy to buy.
tunejunky
hey Hilbert, great job per usual.
my only question is did AMD time this release with the U.S. tax returns in mind? if so....genius 😀
do i need this? nope. both ryzen and threadripper doing fine if not great. do i want this? hell to the YES;)
the x470 boards look way better imo too, but i'll update my taichi and decide if MSI upped their AMD game later.
can't wait to see the 2800 at Fry's
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Fox2232
tunejunky
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Srsbsns
Guys up to 4000mhz memory support out the gate. I think we are going to see a lot more performance come soon.
https://www.asrock.com/MB/AMD/X470%20Taichi/index.asp#Memory
coth
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
HybOj
Id like to give GIANT props to Hilbert for this (and other) reviews. Guru 3D is a place to go for me since 90s, I even like the specific spelling style in a reviews :P
And the fact HH goes to forums, answers our questions and gives a reccomendations... after all those years... damn!!! Thank you! And yes, I like these CPUs .)
alanm
Just noticed something. The review done with the Corsair H110 LC cooler. Then the extra 100mhz OC is probably not worth it. Wonder how the stock cooler performs at default speeds. Because thats a big part of the value equation vs the 8700k since it does not come one.
So AMD went all out in maxing the clocks to get these results. OC'ing therefore may not be a worthy endeavor. Also noticed in another review (Anand) that the 2700x does better in gaming across the board vs the 8700k. Of course different selection of games, but for heavily multi-threaded games like Civ 6, the 2700x will clearly have the advantage.