AMD Radeon RX 590 Spotted in 3DMark Time Spy?
Click here to post a comment for AMD Radeon RX 590 Spotted in 3DMark Time Spy? on our message forum
RzrTrek
Killian38
FOFINHO
If the results end being really close to the RX 580, I won't be surprised.
warlord
Fox2232
warlord
@Fox2232 Anyway it is logical assumption to be a dual gpu this time and I hope results above are with non working crossfire.
There is absolutely zero point to give the same gpu with just smaller node but same transistor and cores count meaning same performance class with same name scheme. It is retarded. No point at all.
If only it is cheaper but you can't sell 590 cheaper than 580 right? I cannot see how Amd will win midrange this time with a so weak and expensive gpu. Gtx 2060 with 1070 performance is coming.
Fox2232
warlord
They need a respectable distance between Vega 56 and RX590. Meanwhile RTX 2070 has 100% win ratio against Vega 64 LC. I cannot comprehend how AMD will beat 2060 considering RX590 cannot be at breathing distance from Vega 56. Anyone would give 50 or even a maximum of 100 bucks more for a clear winner gpu. Budget is not gonna break for such amount if you beat the other one completely in every application.
Fox2232
AlmondMan
AlmondMan
Sure they did. The R9 295x2 for instance. Dual GPU cards are of the past untill AMD gets to the point where infinity fabric makes it possible to have them seem like one.
vbetts
Moderator
rl66
moo100times
Feeling a distinct lack of love for the crossfire possibility here. I can vouch for a strong experience throughout on crossfire, very few issues ever. When I have moved on to AAA games, often a month or two in, driver issues are almost already solved. Having another crossfire card will also encourage them to keep making compatible drivers and crossfire profiles until dx12/vulkan native support might eventually kick in.
I think a well set up 580 x 2 GPU would kick ass. Comfortably into 1080/1080ti territory at £400 or less money. What is not to like?