MSI Spatium M480 2TB NVMe SSD review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Ryzen 7 5700G review
Announcement AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 A-RGB review
Cooler Master Masterair MA624 Stealth/MA612 Stealth ARGB review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Review
F1 2021: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Asustor Drivestor 4 Pro (AS3304T) NAS Review
Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3090 KUDAN review
Corsair Virtuoso RGB Wireless XT headset review
YouTube LiveStream Shows Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 2700X to be 10% faster
On Youtube, a video was posted (Livestream) of a user showing AMD Ryzen 2700X and some results. This means that some people already have been seeded the new Zen+ processors, Pinnacle Ridge.
The video was however removed again but did seem to be the real deal. The results, however, have not been lost, as hey anything that gets out of the web, remains there. The Ryzen 7 2700X processor scored 1790 point in CineBench CB15, a Ryzen 7 1800X scores roughly 1620 points.
So that is give or take roughly a performance increase of 10%, not bad. That result was based on a default clock frequency, the guy also posted a tweaked result, showing 1891 points with all cores at 4.2 GHz.
Interesting to note is the memory latency seems to have dropped a bit, at 3200 MHz CL14 the processor's memory controllers showed a 66ns latency, that's again roughly 10%.
Check the thumbnail below.
Google to launch paid Spotify competitor Youtube Remix next year - 12/11/2017 09:57 AM
Word is out that Youtube will start to compete with Spotify and Apple Music next year with a paid music streaming service that might be called Remix. Google reportedly made a deal with Warner Mu...
Intel Releases latest HD Graphics Driver - Enables Netflix and YouTube HDR - 11/08/2017 10:58 AM
Intel today released its latest Graphics Driver for Windows v15.60 WHQL. It is compatible with most GPU embedded procs including 6th generation "Skylake," 7th generation "Kaby Lake,...
2016 model Samsung TVs to support Youtube HDR - 12/20/2016 09:50 AM
Samsung Electronics today announced that it will support YouTube’s global HDR playback on television for the first time, through an expanded version of the YouTube application. ...
Rumor: YouTube to Stream TV channels though paid subscription - 05/05/2016 03:52 AM
YouTube seems to be working hard on a paid subscription model called Unplugged that would offer customers a bundle of cable TV channels streamed over the Internet, people familiar with the plan said....
Youtube supporting 60fps uploads starting today - 10/30/2014 08:45 AM
Though Chrome only, YouTube announced that it's adding two new features that will especially benefit people who enjoy watching gameplays and those who stream games live. Most excitingly, the site ...
sideeffect
Senior Member
Posts: 323
Joined: 2005-09-24
Senior Member
Posts: 323
Joined: 2005-09-24
#5534450 Posted on: 04/03/2018 02:31 PM
For comparison my 1700 clocked at 3.85GHz all cores gets 1747 CB.
Cache and Memory latency decreases with Ryzen as clock frequency (CPU, IF) increases so that is to be expected and looks like a consequence of the increased frequency with rev 2 rather than any improvements in the design but we will see.
For comparison my 1700 clocked at 3.85GHz all cores gets 1747 CB.
Cache and Memory latency decreases with Ryzen as clock frequency (CPU, IF) increases so that is to be expected and looks like a consequence of the increased frequency with rev 2 rather than any improvements in the design but we will see.
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9793
Joined: 2011-09-21
Senior Member
Posts: 9793
Joined: 2011-09-21
#5534452 Posted on: 04/03/2018 02:34 PM
For comparison my 1700 clocked at 3.85GHz all cores gets 1747 CB.
Cache and Memory latency decreases with Ryzen as clock frequency (CPU, IF) increases so that is to be expected and looks like a consequence of the increased frequency with rev 2 rather than any improvements in the design but we will see.
Well all AMD ever really claimed Zen+ would be is a refined Zen, so speed bump and bump in efficiency is all that should be expected. The leaked latency improvements seem to be a little more than just from the 200Mhz clock increase though.
For comparison my 1700 clocked at 3.85GHz all cores gets 1747 CB.
Cache and Memory latency decreases with Ryzen as clock frequency (CPU, IF) increases so that is to be expected and looks like a consequence of the increased frequency with rev 2 rather than any improvements in the design but we will see.
Well all AMD ever really claimed Zen+ would be is a refined Zen, so speed bump and bump in efficiency is all that should be expected. The leaked latency improvements seem to be a little more than just from the 200Mhz clock increase though.
sideeffect
Senior Member
Posts: 323
Joined: 2005-09-24
Senior Member
Posts: 323
Joined: 2005-09-24
#5534463 Posted on: 04/03/2018 02:52 PM
Yes I am not complaining at all this revision looks like it will be great and the CPU frequency jump is the most important thing.
However a lot of the comparisons to rev 1 seem to be from older benchmarks with loose secondary timings, older BIOS, unknown infinity fabric speeds etc. The score of 1620 CB for 1800X for example is not reflective of current performance if I set my 1700 to 3.7Ghz all cores which is same as 1800x I get 1673 CB and I only have 3000Mhz DDR4.
Yes I am not complaining at all this revision looks like it will be great and the CPU frequency jump is the most important thing.
However a lot of the comparisons to rev 1 seem to be from older benchmarks with loose secondary timings, older BIOS, unknown infinity fabric speeds etc. The score of 1620 CB for 1800X for example is not reflective of current performance if I set my 1700 to 3.7Ghz all cores which is same as 1800x I get 1673 CB and I only have 3000Mhz DDR4.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 5961
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 5961
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5534471 Posted on: 04/03/2018 03:26 PM
Considering the bump in frequency, that's actually a little disappointing. But, that's also just 1 benchmark. Ryzen tends to fare pretty well in Cinebench anyway - it's the games and other latency-picky tasks that was holding back Ryzen the most.
Considering the bump in frequency, that's actually a little disappointing. But, that's also just 1 benchmark. Ryzen tends to fare pretty well in Cinebench anyway - it's the games and other latency-picky tasks that was holding back Ryzen the most.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1155
Joined: 2014-11-19
Waiting on HH to give the real numbers.