Asustor Lockerstor 4 (AS6604T) NAS Review
Hitman III: PC graphics perf benchmark review
TeamGroup CX2 1TB SATA3 SSD review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra review
Corsair 5000D PC Chassis Review
NZXT Kraken X63 RGB Review
ASUS Radeon RX 6900 XT STRIX OC LC Review
TerraMaster F5-221 NAS Review
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 NITRO+ review
Review: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB
In this article we'll look at the fastest graphics card your money can get you, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti based on Pascal architecture. Armed with 11GB of GDDR5X graphics memory and that all new GP102-350 GPU, we are certain we're gonna break some records today.
Read the full review here.
Review: Ghost Recon: Wildlands PC graphics performance review - 03/08/2017 02:45 PM
In this benchmark review we take Ghost Recon: Wildlands for the PC for a test ride. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphi...
Review: Asustor AS6202T Quad Core NAS - 03/07/2017 08:47 AM
Join us as we test the Asustor AS6202T NAS, a vewry powerful solution in the sense that it comes with a much stronger processor, more memory and a plethora of features. The 2 in that product name mean...
Review: AMD Ryzen 7 1800X processor - 03/06/2017 08:34 AM
In this review we take a look at a new Ryzen series processor from AMD. We peek at the Ryzen 7 1800X, a 499 USD processor that has eight cores and 16 threads (SMT). The 8-core processor will be tested...
Review: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X processor - 03/03/2017 01:44 PM
We tested the Flagship processor, now we review the Ryzen 7 1700X Processor that is a 100 bucks cheaper. The 8-core processor will be tested on an X370 motherboard. Read the review here....
Review: ASUS Maximus IX Hero Motherboard - 03/01/2017 09:21 AM
We review the all ASUS Maximus IX Hero. Though very little RGB bling is injected, this motherboard is compatible with the new generalized ASUS AURA SYNC, which is a software suite that allows for mu...
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 2219
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2219
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5404239 Posted on: 03/09/2017 03:22 PM
That's one kickass card. I reckon they won't be selling too many Titan Xs anymore.
That's one kickass card. I reckon they won't be selling too many Titan Xs anymore.
poornaprakash
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: 2008-06-25
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: 2008-06-25
#5404243 Posted on: 03/09/2017 03:26 PM
Regarding Ryzen performance after a very long time we finally started seeing a cost effective alternative to $1000 Intel HEDT CPUs. Things will only improve when the new AMD platform settles a bit. As usual a top notch review from HH.
Regarding Ryzen performance after a very long time we finally started seeing a cost effective alternative to $1000 Intel HEDT CPUs. Things will only improve when the new AMD platform settles a bit. As usual a top notch review from HH.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 5591
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 5591
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5404245 Posted on: 03/09/2017 03:27 PM
With a slight overclock, seems like this is the first true 4K gaming GPU. The regular 1080 wasn't good enough, and the Titan X is too expensive (not that the 1080Ti isn't either...).
Power consumption seems weirdly high though. It's almost as much as 2x 1080s, but isn't double the performance.
There was one weird anomaly though - the Doom Vulkan tests. The top 3 GPUs were all capped at 200FPS. Obviously, the GPUs themselves aren't the bottleneck because their specs are a little too different. That's a pretty clean number, and, a number that no monitor (to my knowledge) can or has ever reached. Makes me think that maybe Vulkan has it's own frame limiter. I don't think it'd be PCIe as a bottleneck because Vulkan is supposed to reduce PCIe bandwidth, so 200 sounds kind of small. I don't think it'd be the CPU as a bottleneck because there would likely be maybe a 1 or 2 FPS difference between each model.
With a slight overclock, seems like this is the first true 4K gaming GPU. The regular 1080 wasn't good enough, and the Titan X is too expensive (not that the 1080Ti isn't either...).
Power consumption seems weirdly high though. It's almost as much as 2x 1080s, but isn't double the performance.
There was one weird anomaly though - the Doom Vulkan tests. The top 3 GPUs were all capped at 200FPS. Obviously, the GPUs themselves aren't the bottleneck because their specs are a little too different. That's a pretty clean number, and, a number that no monitor (to my knowledge) can or has ever reached. Makes me think that maybe Vulkan has it's own frame limiter. I don't think it'd be PCIe as a bottleneck because Vulkan is supposed to reduce PCIe bandwidth, so 200 sounds kind of small. I don't think it'd be the CPU as a bottleneck because there would likely be maybe a 1 or 2 FPS difference between each model.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 14606
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 14606
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5404249 Posted on: 03/09/2017 03:30 PM
It seems only clock difference is making it match or outperform TXP. Gen after gen the same picture. Nevertheless its an beastly card.
Lesson for Titan owners. Learn to be patient.
It seems only clock difference is making it match or outperform TXP. Gen after gen the same picture. Nevertheless its an beastly card.
Lesson for Titan owners. Learn to be patient.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3352
Joined: 2014-10-20
Seems to be a perfect card for 1440p. Thank you Hilbert.