Review: Intel Core i9 9900KS Special edition processor - all cores at 5 GHz

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/15/2019 01:34 PM | source: | 88 comment(s)

Intel has released its flagship desktop processor in the non-HEDT segment. The 9900KS is their most premium Coffee Lake-S eight-core processor that has been discussed so abundantly. This little beast has eight cores, sixteen threads and gets an all-core turbo bin that reaches 5.0 GHz. For many that is gaming nirvana whilst offering a balance of good performance and being a downright excellent gaming processor.

Read our full review here.

Related Stories

Review: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X processor - 16 cores and 32 threads for the masses - 11/14/2019 04:00 PM
AMD today uncovers the Ryzen 9 3950X performance benchmarks, we reviewed the processor extensively. It's the Ryzen 3000 processor with the sixteen cores, thirty-two threads cores and the fastest sing...

Review: ASUS PRIME X570 Pro - 11/13/2019 11:36 AM
We check out the ASUS PRIME X570 Pro motherboard with a Ryzen 7 3700X processor, AMD prepped the X570 chipset, that offers a refined experience for your Ryzen Generation 3 processor. Read the review...

Review: ASUS ROG STRIX Scope keyboard - 11/12/2019 01:24 PM
ASUS offers a model in their keyboard line, the ROG STRIX Scope RGB version that has been fitted with Cherry MX red switches with full RGB LED lit keys that can be animated and profiles. It's a keybo...

Review: GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 Super WTF - 11/08/2019 02:35 PM
We review the new GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 Super in the WTF edition, and yes that is a playful way of wording in many regards. WTF is short for Work The Frames, which realistically you would have never ...

Review: ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB NVMe M.2 SSD - 11/07/2019 01:34 PM
ADATA recently started offering their Spectrix S40G NVMe M.2 SSD series, RGB bling aside, we really wanted to check out this SSD as it is based on a Realtek RTS5762, an 8-channel NAND controller we ha...

18 pages 1 2 3 4 > »

Silva
Senior Member

Posts: 1745
Joined: 2013-06-04

#5731667 Posted on: 11/15/2019 02:12 PM

It would be a great processor if not for the fact that next year you'll need a new motherboard (again) to be able to upgrade.
Intel can't beat AMD offerings with performance alone, as the gap is not what it was pre 2017, let alone with Ryzen 3000.

In August I bought a B450 motherboard and a Ryzen 2600 for cheap, knowing I'll upgrade in two years for Ryzen 4000 or at least the best I can afford of Ryzen 3000.
With Intel, you have no upgrade options. For me that's inexcusable.

fry178
Senior Member

Posts: 1814
Joined: 2012-04-30

#5731671 Posted on: 11/15/2019 02:44 PM

Yeah, and seeing what you cant get for similar price from amd, anyone doing more than gaming @720 will be better off with ryzen.

mohiuddin
Senior Member

Posts: 913
Joined: 2010-11-06

#5731673 Posted on: 11/15/2019 02:57 PM

While scrolling down through the power consumption chart , i was quite fascinated by the 3950x's numbers. While populating 4 more cores under the hood , it consumes less than 3900x. Quite intriguing....

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone

Posts: 43761
Joined: 2000-02-22

#5731674 Posted on: 11/15/2019 03:03 PM

That discussion doesn't belong in this thread, but I have been wondering about it as well. Both CPUs are physically the same (both two 8-core dies) with the same TDP even. It happens under multi-threaded stress, the 3900X has a 3800 MHz all core base-clock, the 3950X @ 3500 MHz. That could account for the 7-watt difference. Then again it can also be an instrument error.

IceVip
Senior Member

Posts: 845
Joined: 2013-04-08

#5731676 Posted on: 11/15/2019 03:21 PM

Hilbert it ain't my place to say this but if i were you i'd get this article off the front page big thumb nail and bring back the 3950x. You're doing Intel a favor but not yourself, I'm just saying.

18 pages 1 2 3 4 > »

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.