ASUS Radeon RX 7600 STRIX OC review
Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
Review: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - That Funky 199 USD One
We look at that non-X model Ryzen 5 2600. The 'regular' six-core proc is a few tenners cheaper compared to the 2600X, but really, it's the same stuff. It's just that the X is better binned and has better default clock frequencies.
Read the full review here.
Review: Samsung 970 PRO M.2 NVMe SSD (512GB) - 04/27/2018 01:54 PM
We review the Samsung 970 PRO M2 SSD, the new SSD offers faster performance and increased TBW values compared to the 960 series. The new M.2 Pro units will be the most popular ones for the professiona...
Review: Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic - 04/26/2018 02:16 PM
We review the Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic. Lian-Li parts from being aluminum outfitted, and overhauled the chassis design combining it with a left-side and front-side mounted tempered glass panel. Will thi...
Review: Samsung 970 EVO M.2 500GB m.2.SSD - 04/24/2018 06:38 PM
Samsung today releases the new 970 EVO and PRO models M.2. SSDs, these offer even faster perf than the 960 series and come with increased TBW values as well. The new M.2 EVO units will be the most pop...
Review: Corsair HS60 Headset - 04/23/2018 08:14 AM
Today we have the Corsair HS60 gaming headset in for review. The headset is a unit designed to bridge the gap between the more budget oriented HS50's and higher end Void and Void Pro RGB units. Read ...
Review: Gigabyte Aorus X470 Gaming 7 Wifi - 04/21/2018 07:57 AM
We take X470 to the next brand as this round we review the 239 USD Gigabyte Aorus X470 Gaming 7 Wifi. All ready for the Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X, yes AMD decided to add a new chipset as well, X...
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 1443
Joined: 2014-07-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1443
Joined: 2014-07-22
#5542710 Posted on: 05/01/2018 04:12 PM
Nice review, as usual, HH...
I agree with you--if I'm going to go with a new cpu (to replace my 1600 @ 3.8GHz) then I should go with the 2700x, or stay put. THe one thing I've noticed from MSI is that the x470 boards all support the 1.0.0.2a AGESA, whereas the x370s have not been updated beyond 1.0.0.1a AGESA. I'm wondering what the difference is, if any. It would be nice if MSI would include that information in its bios update descriptions.
Nice review, as usual, HH...
I agree with you--if I'm going to go with a new cpu (to replace my 1600 @ 3.8GHz) then I should go with the 2700x, or stay put. THe one thing I've noticed from MSI is that the x470 boards all support the 1.0.0.2a AGESA, whereas the x370s have not been updated beyond 1.0.0.1a AGESA. I'm wondering what the difference is, if any. It would be nice if MSI would include that information in its bios update descriptions.
jortego128
Senior Member
Posts: 107
Joined: 2017-04-30
Senior Member
Posts: 107
Joined: 2017-04-30
#5542715 Posted on: 05/01/2018 04:18 PM
Agree with HH the non-X procs are still a great value, but the X versions are the better deal overall, esp. the 2700X-- totally opposite situation from the 1000 series launch last year.
Agree with HH the non-X procs are still a great value, but the X versions are the better deal overall, esp. the 2700X-- totally opposite situation from the 1000 series launch last year.
IceVip
Senior Member
Posts: 882
Joined: 2013-04-08
Senior Member
Posts: 882
Joined: 2013-04-08
#5542778 Posted on: 05/01/2018 07:30 PM
Poor 2600x users, should've gone with the cheaper model.
Poor 2600x users, should've gone with the cheaper model.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 46407
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 46407
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5542784 Posted on: 05/01/2018 07:42 PM
Yeah, I have been looking into that, looks like the latest FC5 patch or drivers increased Quad HD perf a tiny bit (less than 2% though). That or something has been bugging the initial 2600X/2700X measurement. Checking things and will rerun the test (and update) with a 2600X and 2700X.
Updated.
Poor 2600x users, should've gone with the cheaper model.
Yeah, I have been looking into that, looks like the latest FC5 patch or drivers increased Quad HD perf a tiny bit (less than 2% though). That or something has been bugging the initial 2600X/2700X measurement. Checking things and will rerun the test (and update) with a 2600X and 2700X.
Updated.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1497
Joined: 2014-11-19
Wow... really nice $200 chip. @ 4.2 it really zooooms!
Great review HH!! Thank you.