Review: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 08/14/2017 02:59 PM | source: | 185 comment(s)

The 4096 Shader processor enabled Radeon RX Vega 64 with 8GB graphics memory is being reviewed in this article. The new AMD graphics card has arrived, is released and we'll take you through the architecture and the performance numbers. Was it worth the wait?

You can read the full article right here.

Related Stories

Review: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB - 08/14/2017 02:56 PM
We review that Radeon RX Vega 56 with 8GB graphics memory. At 399 bucks this is the what could be affordable AMD graphics card in that new Vega range. It quite honestly might actually be the better pr...

Review: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 08/10/2017 03:01 PM
In this article we review the sixteen core and 32 threaded Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. It is the flagship processor and product that will get a 3.4 GHz base frequency with the ability to precision boost...

Review: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 08/10/2017 03:01 PM
AMD also releases their Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which we review and test. This this is the 12-core part, the base clock is a notch higher at 3.5 GHz and the precision boost is also 4.0 GHz. With 24 ...

Review: ASUS ROG Zenith X399 Extreme - 08/10/2017 03:01 PM
A new thread ripping processor will need to be paired with a proper motherboard, join us in this review of the X399 chipset based ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme. A motherboard loaded with features and high-e...

Review: PrimoChill Praxis WetBench - 08/08/2017 10:27 AM
Chassis you can find in many models and designs, chassis for modding, chassis for the DiY enthusiast and testing however are more scarce. Hence I was looking for an easy to use chassis where we can po...

37 pages 1 2 3 4 > »

AlmondMan
Senior Member

Posts: 763
Joined: 2007-09-03

#5462691 Posted on: 08/14/2017 02:58 PM

OMG not yet available 3 minutes I CANT WAIT

rm082e
Senior Member

Posts: 683
Joined: 2014-12-11

#5462695 Posted on: 08/14/2017 03:02 PM

Exactly what most of us expected.

:/

-Tj-
Senior Member

Posts: 17198
Joined: 2012-05-18

#5462697 Posted on: 08/14/2017 03:03 PM

Ok let's see this mofo :nerd:

Edit: at least its not so hot.. but overall, well meh.. its ok for its money though, wonder what custom version will oc.

bemaniac
Senior Member

Posts: 296
Joined: 2009-03-17

#5462701 Posted on: 08/14/2017 03:10 PM

eww. Ryzen though

omni_gamer
Member

Posts: 22
Joined: 2014-05-28

#5462707 Posted on: 08/14/2017 03:19 PM

wow!

I really wanted this card to be something that it's clearly not. Anyway you slice it, it's a failure. 12 months late to the party with sub-par performance. The only reason I would go this route would be A) I'm a miner or B) I don't want to shell out the extra $300 for a gsync monitor. I think all the R&D $$ went to the CPU department this year.

37 pages 1 2 3 4 > »

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.