GALAX HOF Pro PCIe 4.0 NVMe review
How to: Firmware Update the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming Z review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5600 XT OC review
ASUS STRIX Radeon RX 5600 XT TOP review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming OC review
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for under 10 USD
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
ADATA SE800 1TB Portable SSD review
NVIDIA Shows Lunar Landing demo with RTX Real-Time Ray Tracing
It’s been almost fifty years since the Apollo 11 moon landing, and the controversy of its staging followed it for many decades after. Four years ago, using Maxwell GPU technology, NVIDIA addressed the controversy by showing how it would have been impossible to stage.
For Turing they’ve recreated one of history’s most iconic shots – showcased during Jensen Huang’s keynote at GTC Europe.
This presentation utilizes NVIDIA RTX real-time ray tracing technology and Unreal Engine to showcase the reflection of light on different surfaces, illustrating how the classic photo was taken.
NVIDIA Sells Two SKUs of each Turing GPU (a normal and OC model) - 09/17/2018 01:13 PM
So a colleague website just posted this, and since the cat is out of the bag we might as well post it also. A while ago we noticed separated GPU hardware IDs for the same Turning GPU. Let's call it...
NVIDIA Shield Android TV to Get Fully Functional GeForce Now Service - 07/11/2018 08:43 AM
Nvidia's cloud-based streaming service for games, GeForce Now will be updated for the Shield set-top box with Android TV. The new update invokes the option to run the service in full on the Shield. N...
NVIDIA Shield Experience Upgrade 7.0 Inbound (Android 8.0 Oreo) - 05/24/2018 05:36 PM
Nvidia Shield updates are the gift that keeps on giving. Your SHIELD TV is about to get a big upgrade! Shield experience Upgrade 7.0 has started to roll out to users today, bringing a brand new home ...
Nvidia Shield TV to get an upgrade towards Android O - 01/10/2018 05:50 PM
Despite earlier rumors that the Shield series would not see Android 8, Nvidia is currently working on getting Shield TV updated towards Android TV version 8 Oreo. A specific introduction date was not ...
NVIDIA Star Wars TITAN Xp "Jedi Order" Collectors Edition review - 11/23/2017 03:01 PM
Join our force in the guru order of a review of the GeForce Star Wars TITAN Xp Collector Edition. The card is the fastest consumer graphics card on the globe and is available in a Dark Side and Jedi v...
Irenicus
Senior Member
Posts: 550
Joined: 2015-05-03
Senior Member
Posts: 550
Joined: 2015-05-03
#5596383 Posted on: 10/15/2018 01:50 PM
There was no "controversy" over the moon landing. It was only later that idiot conspiracy theorists started saying it was all fake.
There was no "controversy" over the moon landing. It was only later that idiot conspiracy theorists started saying it was all fake.
karma777police
Senior Member
Posts: 118
Joined: 2018-08-17
Senior Member
Posts: 118
Joined: 2018-08-17
#5596385 Posted on: 10/15/2018 01:54 PM
Quite interesting that Hollywood (First Man) and now Nvidia is trying to prove their fakery. Let's be real, we never left low Earths Orbit let alone went to Moon. I cannot go into technical details why it was impossible then and still not possible however that is about to change with the technological advancement in the past 10 years. Hopefully we reach Moon and Mars in the next 30 - 40 years which is the most realistic prediction.
One of the reasons why we didn't go to Moon yet is Radiation among many other things. When you go to Hospital to take an X Ray, everyone run out of room to hide and protect themselves from the Radiation. An equipment and Astronauts are exposed to such Radiation in the Space, that number is staggering and yet we they went there in a space ship with tinfoil made Ship...give me a break. It is easy to send space ships, rovers, satellites to visit another planets and kudos to them for doing so but sending human out there is whole another ball game we are about to tap into...as I said in 30-40 years realistically.
Do you know what is an official NASA explanation for this? Oh we don't have technology or we destroyed technology they used to land on the Moon...huh? What kinds of an explanation is that...we must have been more advanced back in 1969 then now...never heard that technology advancement goes backwards.
Quite interesting that Hollywood (First Man) and now Nvidia is trying to prove their fakery. Let's be real, we never left low Earths Orbit let alone went to Moon. I cannot go into technical details why it was impossible then and still not possible however that is about to change with the technological advancement in the past 10 years. Hopefully we reach Moon and Mars in the next 30 - 40 years which is the most realistic prediction.
One of the reasons why we didn't go to Moon yet is Radiation among many other things. When you go to Hospital to take an X Ray, everyone run out of room to hide and protect themselves from the Radiation. An equipment and Astronauts are exposed to such Radiation in the Space, that number is staggering and yet we they went there in a space ship with tinfoil made Ship...give me a break. It is easy to send space ships, rovers, satellites to visit another planets and kudos to them for doing so but sending human out there is whole another ball game we are about to tap into...as I said in 30-40 years realistically.
Do you know what is an official NASA explanation for this? Oh we don't have technology or we destroyed technology they used to land on the Moon...huh? What kinds of an explanation is that...we must have been more advanced back in 1969 then now...never heard that technology advancement goes backwards.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9863
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 9863
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5596389 Posted on: 10/15/2018 02:00 PM
It was quite possible back in the day. Issue is survival of crew long enough to get back irradiated and die back on Earth.
I'd say that in worst case scenario Armstrong's team went to orbit and another team finished Moon mission. (This is possibility, but let's be honest... Nobody else was there to confirm/disprove
)
Apparently someone got to Moon and left HW there. That's something nobody should try to disprove.
Quite interesting that Hollywood (First Man) and now Nvidia is trying to prove their fakery. Let's be real, we never left low Earths Orbit let alone went to Moon. I cannot go into technical details why it was impossible then and still not possible however that is about to change with the technological advancement in the past 10 years. Hopefully we reach Moon and Mars in the next 30 - 40 years which is the most realistic prediction.
It was quite possible back in the day. Issue is survival of crew long enough to get back irradiated and die back on Earth.
I'd say that in worst case scenario Armstrong's team went to orbit and another team finished Moon mission. (This is possibility, but let's be honest... Nobody else was there to confirm/disprove
)Apparently someone got to Moon and left HW there. That's something nobody should try to disprove.
kapu
Senior Member
Posts: 3745
Joined: 2006-12-22
Senior Member
Posts: 3745
Joined: 2006-12-22
#5596390 Posted on: 10/15/2018 02:00 PM
Please go back to school.
Please go back to school.
Emil
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 2016-12-25
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 2016-12-25
#5596392 Posted on: 10/15/2018 02:09 PM
A very nice demo, it's good that Nvidia is introducing this technology.
BUT...
I can imagine that Entizias will buy 2080 Ti for 1200 $ but I can not imagine that someone from the 4k@60fps monitor or 21: 9@100fps will return to full HD.
A very nice demo, it's good that Nvidia is introducing this technology.
BUT...
I can imagine that Entizias will buy 2080 Ti for 1200 $ but I can not imagine that someone from the 4k@60fps monitor or 21: 9@100fps will return to full HD.
tensai28
Senior Member
Posts: 1416
Joined: 2013-10-31
Senior Member
Posts: 1416
Joined: 2013-10-31
#5596393 Posted on: 10/15/2018 02:10 PM
Tired of seeing nvidia demos that we can't try ourselves. When are they going to publicly release those Ray tracing and dlss demos? It's getting weird. Reviewers can use them but we can't.
Tired of seeing nvidia demos that we can't try ourselves. When are they going to publicly release those Ray tracing and dlss demos? It's getting weird. Reviewers can use them but we can't.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5596401 Posted on: 10/15/2018 02:30 PM
Are reviewers able to use them? I didn't know anybody could get their hands on them. But otherwise I would agree. Assuming these are actually rendering in realtime, why not have a standalone executable? There doesn't have to be any configuration settings, you just run it and watch, maybe with a keyboard shortcut to view FPS or whatever.
Tired of seeing nvidia demos that we can't try ourselves. When are they going to publicly release those Ray tracing and dlss demos? It's getting weird. Reviewers can use them but we can't.
Are reviewers able to use them? I didn't know anybody could get their hands on them. But otherwise I would agree. Assuming these are actually rendering in realtime, why not have a standalone executable? There doesn't have to be any configuration settings, you just run it and watch, maybe with a keyboard shortcut to view FPS or whatever.
AlmondMan
Senior Member
Posts: 497
Joined: 2007-09-03
Senior Member
Posts: 497
Joined: 2007-09-03
#5596402 Posted on: 10/15/2018 02:30 PM
I cannot go into technical details why it was impossible then and still not possible
Of course you can't, because there's no details about it being impossible then or now. You should be ashamed of yourself.
It was quite possible back in the day. Issue is survival of crew long enough to get back irradiated and die back on Earth.
I'd say that in worst case scenario Armstrong's team went to orbit and another team finished Moon mission. (This is possibility, but let's be honest... Nobody else was there to confirm/disprove )
Apparently someone got to Moon and left HW there. That's something nobody should try to disprove.
You should be ashamed of yourself as well. Not as much as the above guy, but ALMOST.
I cannot go into technical details why it was impossible then and still not possible
Of course you can't, because there's no details about it being impossible then or now. You should be ashamed of yourself.
It was quite possible back in the day. Issue is survival of crew long enough to get back irradiated and die back on Earth.
I'd say that in worst case scenario Armstrong's team went to orbit and another team finished Moon mission. (This is possibility, but let's be honest... Nobody else was there to confirm/disprove
)Apparently someone got to Moon and left HW there. That's something nobody should try to disprove.
You should be ashamed of yourself as well. Not as much as the above guy, but ALMOST.
HawaiianBrian
Senior Member
Posts: 243
Joined: 2014-10-22
Senior Member
Posts: 243
Joined: 2014-10-22
#5596408 Posted on: 10/15/2018 02:39 PM
Quite interesting that Hollywood (First Man) and now Nvidia is trying to prove their fakery. Let's be real, we never left low Earths Orbit let alone went to Moon. I cannot go into technical details why it was impossible then and still not possible however that is about to change with the technological advancement in the past 10 years. Hopefully we reach Moon and Mars in the next 30 - 40 years which is the most realistic prediction.
One of the reasons why we didn't go to Moon yet is Radiation among many other things. When you go to Hospital to take an X Ray, everyone run out of room to hide and protect themselves from the Radiation. An equipment and Astronauts are exposed to such Radiation in the Space, that number is staggering and yet we they went there in a space ship with tinfoil made Ship...give me a break. It is easy to send space ships, rovers, satellites to visit another planets and kudos to them for doing so but sending human out there is whole another ball game we are about to tap into...as I said in 30-40 years realistically.
Do you know what is an official NASA explanation for this? Oh we don't have technology or we destroyed technology they used to land on the Moon...huh? What kinds of an explanation is that...we must have been more advanced back in 1969 then now...never heard that technology advancement goes backwards.
Your an ignorant Fool. Yes i insulted him. So? This fool deserves it.
I could go on and on.
If this were my site id ban you.
Quite interesting that Hollywood (First Man) and now Nvidia is trying to prove their fakery. Let's be real, we never left low Earths Orbit let alone went to Moon. I cannot go into technical details why it was impossible then and still not possible however that is about to change with the technological advancement in the past 10 years. Hopefully we reach Moon and Mars in the next 30 - 40 years which is the most realistic prediction.
One of the reasons why we didn't go to Moon yet is Radiation among many other things. When you go to Hospital to take an X Ray, everyone run out of room to hide and protect themselves from the Radiation. An equipment and Astronauts are exposed to such Radiation in the Space, that number is staggering and yet we they went there in a space ship with tinfoil made Ship...give me a break. It is easy to send space ships, rovers, satellites to visit another planets and kudos to them for doing so but sending human out there is whole another ball game we are about to tap into...as I said in 30-40 years realistically.
Do you know what is an official NASA explanation for this? Oh we don't have technology or we destroyed technology they used to land on the Moon...huh? What kinds of an explanation is that...we must have been more advanced back in 1969 then now...never heard that technology advancement goes backwards.
Your an ignorant Fool. Yes i insulted him. So? This fool deserves it.
I could go on and on.
If this were my site id ban you.
tensai28
Senior Member
Posts: 1416
Joined: 2013-10-31
Senior Member
Posts: 1416
Joined: 2013-10-31
#5596409 Posted on: 10/15/2018 02:41 PM
I could of swore they were. Unless I'm mistaken.
https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/gigabyte-geforce-rtx-2080-ti-gaming-oc-11g-review,24.html
https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/gigabyte-geforce-rtx-2080-ti-gaming-oc-11g-review,25.html
Seems like Hilbert kinda somewhat got his hands on some.
Are reviewers able to use them? I didn't know anybody could get their hands on them. But otherwise I would agree. Assuming these are actually rendering in realtime, why not have a standalone executable? There doesn't have to be any configuration settings, you just run it and watch, maybe with a keyboard shortcut to view FPS or whatever.
I could of swore they were. Unless I'm mistaken.
https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/gigabyte-geforce-rtx-2080-ti-gaming-oc-11g-review,24.html
https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/gigabyte-geforce-rtx-2080-ti-gaming-oc-11g-review,25.html
Seems like Hilbert kinda somewhat got his hands on some.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12502
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12502
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5596415 Posted on: 10/15/2018 02:52 PM
This was a VXGI demo originally? Would be cool to see A/B tests image quality/accuracy between the two methods along with performance.
This was a VXGI demo originally? Would be cool to see A/B tests image quality/accuracy between the two methods along with performance.
Præses
Senior Member
Posts: 939
Joined: 2004-05-15
Senior Member
Posts: 939
Joined: 2004-05-15
#5596457 Posted on: 10/15/2018 04:03 PM
Quite interesting that Hollywood (First Man) and now Nvidia is trying to prove their fakery. Let's be real, we never left low Earths Orbit let alone went to Moon. I cannot go into technical details why it was impossible then and still not possible however that is about to change with the technological advancement in the past 10 years. Hopefully we reach Moon and Mars in the next 30 - 40 years which is the most realistic prediction.
One of the reasons why we didn't go to Moon yet is Radiation among many other things. When you go to Hospital to take an X Ray, everyone run out of room to hide and protect themselves from the Radiation. An equipment and Astronauts are exposed to such Radiation in the Space, that number is staggering and yet we they went there in a space ship with tinfoil made Ship...give me a break. It is easy to send space ships, rovers, satellites to visit another planets and kudos to them for doing so but sending human out there is whole another ball game we are about to tap into...as I said in 30-40 years realistically.
Do you know what is an official NASA explanation for this? Oh we don't have technology or we destroyed technology they used to land on the Moon...huh? What kinds of an explanation is that...we must have been more advanced back in 1969 then now...never heard that technology advancement goes backwards.
I look forward to your published research on this subject, as you're clearly not just a google "researcher" and definitely have some physics degrees to your name... /s
Quite interesting that Hollywood (First Man) and now Nvidia is trying to prove their fakery. Let's be real, we never left low Earths Orbit let alone went to Moon. I cannot go into technical details why it was impossible then and still not possible however that is about to change with the technological advancement in the past 10 years. Hopefully we reach Moon and Mars in the next 30 - 40 years which is the most realistic prediction.
One of the reasons why we didn't go to Moon yet is Radiation among many other things. When you go to Hospital to take an X Ray, everyone run out of room to hide and protect themselves from the Radiation. An equipment and Astronauts are exposed to such Radiation in the Space, that number is staggering and yet we they went there in a space ship with tinfoil made Ship...give me a break. It is easy to send space ships, rovers, satellites to visit another planets and kudos to them for doing so but sending human out there is whole another ball game we are about to tap into...as I said in 30-40 years realistically.
Do you know what is an official NASA explanation for this? Oh we don't have technology or we destroyed technology they used to land on the Moon...huh? What kinds of an explanation is that...we must have been more advanced back in 1969 then now...never heard that technology advancement goes backwards.
I look forward to your published research on this subject, as you're clearly not just a google "researcher" and definitely have some physics degrees to your name... /s
AcidSnow
Senior Member
Posts: 419
Joined: 2013-08-09
Senior Member
Posts: 419
Joined: 2013-08-09
#5596476 Posted on: 10/15/2018 04:28 PM
It amazes me that some people still think the moon landing was faked; probably the same people who think the earth is flat. :sadtrombone:
It amazes me that some people still think the moon landing was faked; probably the same people who think the earth is flat. :sadtrombone:
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9863
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 9863
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5596495 Posted on: 10/15/2018 05:18 PM
There is no proof either way. It is similar to "magic" tricks. Unless you say STOP and dissect it in progress, you can't prove it was trick or magic afterwards.
Therefore me saying that possibility exists is same as saying that: "there is change that God exists, it is just pretty slim".
I understand that uncertainty may be frightening for you, but almost nothing is certain in this world.
You should be ashamed of yourself as well. Not as much as the above guy, but ALMOST.
There is no proof either way. It is similar to "magic" tricks. Unless you say STOP and dissect it in progress, you can't prove it was trick or magic afterwards.
Therefore me saying that possibility exists is same as saying that: "there is change that God exists, it is just pretty slim".
I understand that uncertainty may be frightening for you, but almost nothing is certain in this world.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 9863
Joined: 2012-07-20
Makes things much easier when you do not need to send rays in almost 50% of sphere as they went with "star-less" sky. Which is quite accurate on Sun lit surface of Moon as it is too bright in comparison to stars/galaxies in sky.