New NVIDIA Press Embargo Stirs Things Up
Roughly a week media should have received a new long-term NDA from NVIDIA. This NDA is an agreement between NVIDIA and the media outlet. The new embargo is, however, stirring up a few things for some websites.
In particular website Heise is not rather happy about the new embargo. In fact, Heise feels the new non-disclosure agreement is so wrong that felt the need to publish the non-disclosure agreement as an article online on their website. According to Heise, the document is in violation of journalistic principles. They (much like us) received the document on June 20, with the request to sign it within two days. The document itself is designed in such a manner that it's benefitting NVIDIA, e.g. favoring Nvidia. The agreement is long-term, and states that confidential information must be kept secret for five years, but if it concerns a 'professional trade secret', that confidentiality will never pass. This, in theory, could mean that journalists never could reveal a specific leaked detail from another source. Heise made it clear that they will not sign the NDA and considered it their journalistic duty by "creating transparency" with publishing the document in its entirety.
That said, allow me to give you my take (the Guru3D side) of this topic slash story. Press embargoes have been here for years and from anyone. From AIB partners we work with, to (at the time) Intel, to Nvidia towards AMD. If a new Intel Chipset motherboard is released? We receive such NDA from MSI, ASUS, Gigabyte and onwards. So basically, the minute you get your hands on samples that are not released yet, you'll need to have signed a non-disclosure agreement. While I do not feel a need to defend NVIDIA whatsoever, the new long-term NDA from NVIDIA is not very different from older ones ergo, I was not at all that surprised by its contents. Interesting, however, is the line: "Shall not: post news stories based on confidential information". But here again, that's not very different from what we have seen in the past and certainly not very different from NDAs we receive from other parties in the technology industry.
Why the new NDA is stirring and heating things up so much for certain media, I can only speculate about. I truly think the GPP discussion ignited some things, a certain disgruntled feel about NVIDIA, trying to force certain practices. In all my years of posted news and articles, we've never had to fight with NVIDIA over any content we posted, and we do post it all. That doesn't mean however these contracts should be taken lightly. As time passes and with everything that is going on in the world in matters of privacy, objectivity and the tech industry as a whole, perhaps it's time for NVIDIA to look into remodeling such embargoes to gain trust. We signed the NDA, we can opt-out anytime. Will be doing anything different compared to the past? No Sir. Do we expect heat on our content from NVIDIA? No Sir, not at all. And if they do, NVIDIA will shoot themselves in the foot as the press as an entirety is something they cannot control. Hey, and if we disagree about a request that NVIDIA would make, we can opt-out of any embargo anytime.
While its good to address these topics open and transparent I just feel that the reality is also that the new embargo really isn't that different from the older ones, which Heise certainly signed time after time at any event and product release. It's not cool to have to sign NDAs, but unfortunately, it comes with the territory of testing, reviewing and writing news about products that have not been released. I would love to live without them, but also understand why they exist. Each media outlet will have a different opinion about that, of course. Which we totally respect.
Below you can read the new long-term NDA.
New NVIDIA GPU is named at Reuters, called Turing - 02/13/2018 02:52 PM
In an article on Reuters, they talk about the king craze and how well that benefits NVIDIA with prices shooting through the roof. More interesting is that the article mentioned Nvidia would release a...
New Nvidia GeForce Titan X is coming very soon - a collector's edition - 11/03/2017 06:46 PM
Nvidia in its twittter page posted a video, teasing a new Collector's Edition Titan Xp. The video is meant as a viral to create some momentum of the new card....
EK unveils new NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 water blocks - 05/24/2016 09:28 AM
EK is proud to introduce full-cover liquid cooling solution for NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1080 series graphics cards, based on Pascal GP104 graphics processor....
New NVIDIA GeForce driver 358.66 shows Vulkan Pascal and Volta support - 11/04/2015 06:13 PM
Interesting, in our forums Krzyslaw spotted that over at laptopvideo2go there is a 358.66 driver that shows support for Vulkan, Pascal and Volta ? ...
New Nvidia Head Quarters back on track after delay - 04/07/2015 12:12 PM
Thoughy delayed by a year or two Nvidia is now putting their futuristic Santa Clara campus project back on track, though with a new design. The graphics chipmaker confirmed on Tuesday that it would ...
Senior Member
Posts: 1970
Joined: 2013-06-04
I'm disappointed about you signing this HH.
It's normal to have NDA so you can get the reviewing samples early, and release the review at the same time as everyone else.
But this is different, what Nvidia wants is that no one make news posts about leaked information of new products, this is not only anti journalism but anti consumer too.
It's too soon after GPP, and it's right at the same time we hear about Nvidia having too much GPU stock. And CEO said on the beginning of this month we would have to wait a long time for new GPUs.
I'm truly disappointed in Guru3D for signing up to this BS and hope more people like Heise don't put their trousers down for Nvidia.
Senior Member
Posts: 653
Joined: 2010-01-20
i would love to read the GPP also.
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 2017-05-19
I, too, am disappointed by you signing this Hilbert due to such an extended duration for some of the clauses. Over the years I've grown not only to really enjoy your writing style and your in-depth reviews, but trust you and your content as well.
Edit: Clarified that my disappointment is about the durations of some of the clauses, not that the NDA exists.
Senior Member
Posts: 14300
Joined: 2014-07-21
Maybe @Hilbert Hagedoorn can answer me this:
What's the worst that can happen to any such journalist NOT signing that NDA? That you're late with your articles when the NDA dates lift, taking you longer to prepare the numbers and graphs etc.?
What does Nvidia offer those that actually sign it in the first place? Inside scoops that you're not allowed to write about?
I'm not sure why anybody would sign that, besides the point that these days, the first to put out such information on their site seemingly earns the most money with it?
Senior Member
Posts: 4147
Joined: 2011-11-24
I think the core issue is that if you are not allowed to report on what you want, you are not a journalist. You're just a press release outlet. In other words, a PR tool. Heise, AFAICT, does actual journalism, which involves reporting on matters that NVidia (or any other company) would prefer to not be reported about.
Imagine if this was happening in politics. Like if the BBC signed an NDA with the British government not to report on any matters obtained through informers. Ever.
Of course politics and computer hardware are not the same thing, but journalistic integrity for sites that actually do journalism should still be important, regardless of the content matter, and signing NDAs that never expire or are unreasonably long means you can't be trusted by the consumers.