GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founder edition review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti STRIX OC review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti TRIO X review
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC PRO review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - November 2020
Teamgroup MP33 PRO NVMe M2 SSD review
ASUS Radeon RX 6800 XT STRIX OC LC Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 XT NITRO+ review
XFX Radeon RX 6800 XT Speedster MERC 319 review
Corsair MP400 4TB NVMe M2 SSD review
New Battlefield V game would take place in World War II Setting
Over at GamesBeat, part of the VentureBeat they write that the next Battlefield release would be situated in a Second World War setting. They mention that the info is derived based upon anonymous sources close to Electronic Arts.
The new iteration would be called Battlefield V, which is based on a leaked screenshot via Reddit. So that would follow up Battlefield 4 released back in in 2013. Just like World War I got a sequel, Battlefield 1 is getting a followup later this year. The game is Battlefield V which was previously known as Battlefield 2 internally at EA.
Battlefield V will return the series to World War II in a main entry for the first time since 2009’s Battlefield 1943, GamesBeat has learned from sources familiar with EA’s plans. These sources wish to remain anonymous. The reason for the game’s title is a bit of a mystery. Internally, Battlefield V was known as “Battlefield 2.” That would’ve made sense and kept with the naming convention adopted in 2016. Battlefield 1 transported players to World War I, so a game set in World War II could logically be named Battlefield 2. Perhaps DICE didn’t want to confuse longtime players, though. A 2005 entry in the series was titled Battlefield 2.
EA Announces New Battlefield 1 Revolution Competitive Mode - 08/22/2017 08:01 AM
Huge 64-player battles are a hallmark for the Battlefield franchise, a new mode for Battlefield 1 will focus on war at a much smaller scale. That new mode, Incursions, will introduce 5v5 battles to Ba...
EA makes a bold statement: No new Battlefield for ‘a couple of years’ - 12/02/2016 11:40 AM
So EA is not planning a new Battlefield game for the coming years, not even 2018 will see a new Battlefield. Quite surprising as Battlefield 1 might be the best selling PC gaming title in 2016....
New Battlefield 1 Single-Player Trailer (Video) - 09/28/2016 07:59 AM
The Battlefield website has a new feature on "the single player of Battlefield 1". Battlefield 1 will be available from Oct 21st 2016 on PlayStation 4, Xbox One, and PC....
New Battlefield 5 game to be announced Next Friday - 05/01/2016 07:42 AM
Yeah, so it's like an EA made an announcement about an announcement ? Anyway EA and DICE will Arts announce that the next Battlefield game will be revealed on Friday, May 6th....
Dice reveals Dragon Valley as the new Battlefield 4 map - 11/13/2015 09:08 AM
DICE has just revealed the brand new Battlefield 4 'Classic Map', and it's Dragon Valley, the map that shipped with Battlefield 2 - which just turned 10 years old. ...
wantobe
Senior Member
Posts: 113
Joined: 2013-01-10
Senior Member
Posts: 113
Joined: 2013-01-10
#5524656 Posted on: 03/02/2018 11:39 AM
Came here just to say that after buying many Battlefields I will not be buying BF V. So many DLC's with BF1 and when I bought the DLC there were no people on servers! Luckily for one of the DLC's I got a refund. 2142 and BF3 is where my sentiments lay and were not replaced by newer titles. Time to let it go.
Came here just to say that after buying many Battlefields I will not be buying BF V. So many DLC's with BF1 and when I bought the DLC there were no people on servers! Luckily for one of the DLC's I got a refund. 2142 and BF3 is where my sentiments lay and were not replaced by newer titles. Time to let it go.
Solfaur
Senior Member
Posts: 7415
Joined: 2005-08-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7415
Joined: 2005-08-10
#5524659 Posted on: 03/02/2018 11:43 AM
Yeah well, naming problems were bound to happen everything considered. At least they didn't call it battlefield ww2...
Personally I am rather happy that they chose this setting, I mean they have the whole infrastructure from BF1 ready, so they have far less work on their plate and less things that they could mess up. I would have been way more concerned if they went for a futuristic setting.
Now let's hope they will focus on map designs and game modes balancing! If they do the guns and time to kill like in the latest BF1 patch, it's good enough.
Yeah well, naming problems were bound to happen everything considered. At least they didn't call it battlefield ww2...
Personally I am rather happy that they chose this setting, I mean they have the whole infrastructure from BF1 ready, so they have far less work on their plate and less things that they could mess up. I would have been way more concerned if they went for a futuristic setting.
Now let's hope they will focus on map designs and game modes balancing! If they do the guns and time to kill like in the latest BF1 patch, it's good enough.
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 11882
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 11882
Joined: 2014-07-21
#5524662 Posted on: 03/02/2018 11:46 AM
*still hopes people will stop calling Hardline a Battlefield game*
*still hopes people will stop calling Hardline a Battlefield game*
Ricepudding
Senior Member
Posts: 720
Joined: 2017-02-17
Senior Member
Posts: 720
Joined: 2017-02-17
#5524671 Posted on: 03/02/2018 11:59 AM
Well it’s a battlefield game... guess it’s more like bad company though and just not part of the “main series”.
*still hopes people will stop calling Hardline a Battlefield game*
Well it’s a battlefield game... guess it’s more like bad company though and just not part of the “main series”.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 720
Joined: 2017-02-17
Whelp, there goes a naming structure... Since V doesn't make a lot of sense... then again naming never made much sense to them... BF 1942, BF2, BF2142, BF3, BF4, BF Hardline, BF1 now BFV (or 5)... Kinda miss BF2142 honestly