Borderlands 3: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Swiftech H240 X3 AIO review
Promo: URCDKey Autumn Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
Corsair HS35 Stereo Gaming Headset Review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming X review
Gears of War 5: PC graphics performance benchmark review
XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT THICC II Ultra review
ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Formula review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Gaming X review
New Battlefield V game would take place in World War II Setting
Over at GamesBeat, part of the VentureBeat they write that the next Battlefield release would be situated in a Second World War setting. They mention that the info is derived based upon anonymous sources close to Electronic Arts.
The new iteration would be called Battlefield V, which is based on a leaked screenshot via Reddit. So that would follow up Battlefield 4 released back in in 2013. Just like World War I got a sequel, Battlefield 1 is getting a followup later this year. The game is Battlefield V which was previously known as Battlefield 2 internally at EA.
Battlefield V will return the series to World War II in a main entry for the first time since 2009’s Battlefield 1943, GamesBeat has learned from sources familiar with EA’s plans. These sources wish to remain anonymous. The reason for the game’s title is a bit of a mystery. Internally, Battlefield V was known as “Battlefield 2.” That would’ve made sense and kept with the naming convention adopted in 2016. Battlefield 1 transported players to World War I, so a game set in World War II could logically be named Battlefield 2. Perhaps DICE didn’t want to confuse longtime players, though. A 2005 entry in the series was titled Battlefield 2.
EA Announces New Battlefield 1 Revolution Competitive Mode - 08/22/2017 09:01 AM
Huge 64-player battles are a hallmark for the Battlefield franchise, a new mode for Battlefield 1 will focus on war at a much smaller scale. That new mode, Incursions, will introduce 5v5 battles to Ba...
EA makes a bold statement: No new Battlefield for ‘a couple of years’ - 12/02/2016 12:40 PM
So EA is not planning a new Battlefield game for the coming years, not even 2018 will see a new Battlefield. Quite surprising as Battlefield 1 might be the best selling PC gaming title in 2016....
New Battlefield 1 Single-Player Trailer (Video) - 09/28/2016 08:59 AM
The Battlefield website has a new feature on "the single player of Battlefield 1". Battlefield 1 will be available from Oct 21st 2016 on PlayStation 4, Xbox One, and PC....
New Battlefield 5 game to be announced Next Friday - 05/01/2016 08:42 AM
Yeah, so it's like an EA made an announcement about an announcement ? Anyway EA and DICE will Arts announce that the next Battlefield game will be revealed on Friday, May 6th....
Dice reveals Dragon Valley as the new Battlefield 4 map - 11/13/2015 10:08 AM
DICE has just revealed the brand new Battlefield 4 'Classic Map', and it's Dragon Valley, the map that shipped with Battlefield 2 - which just turned 10 years old. ...
wantobe
Senior Member
Posts: 109
Joined: 2013-01-10
Senior Member
Posts: 109
Joined: 2013-01-10
#5524656 Posted on: 03/02/2018 12:39 PM
Came here just to say that after buying many Battlefields I will not be buying BF V. So many DLC's with BF1 and when I bought the DLC there were no people on servers! Luckily for one of the DLC's I got a refund. 2142 and BF3 is where my sentiments lay and were not replaced by newer titles. Time to let it go.
Came here just to say that after buying many Battlefields I will not be buying BF V. So many DLC's with BF1 and when I bought the DLC there were no people on servers! Luckily for one of the DLC's I got a refund. 2142 and BF3 is where my sentiments lay and were not replaced by newer titles. Time to let it go.
Solfaur
Senior Member
Posts: 7095
Joined: 2005-08-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7095
Joined: 2005-08-10
#5524659 Posted on: 03/02/2018 12:43 PM
Yeah well, naming problems were bound to happen everything considered. At least they didn't call it battlefield ww2...
Personally I am rather happy that they chose this setting, I mean they have the whole infrastructure from BF1 ready, so they have far less work on their plate and less things that they could mess up. I would have been way more concerned if they went for a futuristic setting.
Now let's hope they will focus on map designs and game modes balancing! If they do the guns and time to kill like in the latest BF1 patch, it's good enough.
Yeah well, naming problems were bound to happen everything considered. At least they didn't call it battlefield ww2...
Personally I am rather happy that they chose this setting, I mean they have the whole infrastructure from BF1 ready, so they have far less work on their plate and less things that they could mess up. I would have been way more concerned if they went for a futuristic setting.
Now let's hope they will focus on map designs and game modes balancing! If they do the guns and time to kill like in the latest BF1 patch, it's good enough.
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 10628
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 10628
Joined: 2014-07-21
#5524662 Posted on: 03/02/2018 12:46 PM
*still hopes people will stop calling Hardline a Battlefield game*
*still hopes people will stop calling Hardline a Battlefield game*
Ricepudding
Senior Member
Posts: 491
Joined: 2017-02-17
Senior Member
Posts: 491
Joined: 2017-02-17
#5524671 Posted on: 03/02/2018 12:59 PM
Well it’s a battlefield game... guess it’s more like bad company though and just not part of the “main series”.
*still hopes people will stop calling Hardline a Battlefield game*
Well it’s a battlefield game... guess it’s more like bad company though and just not part of the “main series”.
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 10628
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 10628
Joined: 2014-07-21
#5524672 Posted on: 03/02/2018 01:01 PM
It's about gangs. Bad Company games were 100 times more Battlefield than Hardline and to me belong in the series. Hardline's just trying to grab players off of Heist / COD.
Well it’s a battlefield game... guess it’s more like bad company though and just not part of the “main series”.
It's about gangs. Bad Company games were 100 times more Battlefield than Hardline and to me belong in the series. Hardline's just trying to grab players off of Heist / COD.
KissSh0t
Senior Member
Posts: 6920
Joined: 2011-10-22
Senior Member
Posts: 6920
Joined: 2011-10-22
#5524673 Posted on: 03/02/2018 01:03 PM
I think Battlefield 2143 would be nice.
I think Battlefield 2143 would be nice.
dunadan101
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 2016-12-28
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 2016-12-28
#5524683 Posted on: 03/02/2018 01:24 PM
The V can stand for V-E Day "Victory in Europe Day" as well I guess..
I just hope they explore more stuff than the typical Normandy, Holland, Germany featuring Anglos vs Nazies we've been seeing only too much once again in the last year. Ostfront, Pacific and North Africa involved other nations like Russia, Italy, Japan, China and even Vichy France and the very diverse Free French Forces.
Why is it people always forget Battlefield Vietnam? Technically BF2 was third game in the franchise. I remember getting this game specifically after my parents finally had adsl installed in our home July 2k4 and it also enjoyed some of the impressive mods in the series like Point of Existence and Eve of Destruction although BF2 quickly replaced it.
The V can stand for V-E Day "Victory in Europe Day" as well I guess..
I just hope they explore more stuff than the typical Normandy, Holland, Germany featuring Anglos vs Nazies we've been seeing only too much once again in the last year. Ostfront, Pacific and North Africa involved other nations like Russia, Italy, Japan, China and even Vichy France and the very diverse Free French Forces.
Whelp, there goes a naming structure... Since V doesn't make a lot of sense... then again naming never made much sense to them... BF 1942, BF2, BF2142, BF3, BF4, BF Hardline, BF1 now BFV (or 5)... Kinda miss BF2142 honestly
Why is it people always forget Battlefield Vietnam? Technically BF2 was third game in the franchise. I remember getting this game specifically after my parents finally had adsl installed in our home July 2k4 and it also enjoyed some of the impressive mods in the series like Point of Existence and Eve of Destruction although BF2 quickly replaced it.
strike
Junior Member
Posts: 4
Joined: 2018-01-25
Junior Member
Posts: 4
Joined: 2018-01-25
#5524701 Posted on: 03/02/2018 02:07 PM
I wish BF2142 would get a sequel already, bad enough that EA shut down the revival servers that were online up until a few months ago.
I wish BF2142 would get a sequel already, bad enough that EA shut down the revival servers that were online up until a few months ago.
Silva
Senior Member
Posts: 909
Joined: 2013-06-04
Senior Member
Posts: 909
Joined: 2013-06-04
#5524726 Posted on: 03/02/2018 03:02 PM
I loved BF1942, BF Vietnam, BF2, BF2BC2 and even BF3.
But I'll never buy another game that has planed DLC before release, micro transactions or is made by a publisher like EA.
I loved BF1942, BF Vietnam, BF2, BF2BC2 and even BF3.
But I'll never buy another game that has planed DLC before release, micro transactions or is made by a publisher like EA.
Size_Mick
Senior Member
Posts: 308
Joined: 2002-03-22
Senior Member
Posts: 308
Joined: 2002-03-22
#5524745 Posted on: 03/02/2018 03:42 PM
BF2 is still fun to play offline. There are tons of single-player and co-op mods for it. Head over to http://www.battlefieldsingleplayer.com/ if you care. Why are there too many spaces between my words?
BF2 is still fun to play offline. There are tons of single-player and co-op mods for it. Head over to http://www.battlefieldsingleplayer.com/ if you care. Why are there too many spaces between my words?
RzrTrek
Senior Member
Posts: 2261
Joined: 2012-04-16
Senior Member
Posts: 2261
Joined: 2012-04-16
#5524762 Posted on: 03/02/2018 04:29 PM
The game better have full modability like Battlefield 2 (2005) or I will have to pass again like I did with Battlefield 4 (only played for a month) Hardline and BF1.
However I'm doubtful EA DICE will be able to deliver something new and unique; seeing how they prefer their copy and paste philosophy to make carbon copies.
The game better have full modability like Battlefield 2 (2005) or I will have to pass again like I did with Battlefield 4 (only played for a month) Hardline and BF1.
However I'm doubtful EA DICE will be able to deliver something new and unique; seeing how they prefer their copy and paste philosophy to make carbon copies.
AndreasGuido
Senior Member
Posts: 4966
Joined: 2009-10-12
Senior Member
Posts: 4966
Joined: 2009-10-12
#5524768 Posted on: 03/02/2018 04:44 PM
Meh i was expecting Cold War era, 70-90 or something along those lines.
BF1 was a let down, bet we will have behemoths and hero pick ups again.
Meh i was expecting Cold War era, 70-90 or something along those lines.
BF1 was a let down, bet we will have behemoths and hero pick ups again.
hapkiman
Member
Posts: 67
Joined: 2014-12-22
Member
Posts: 67
Joined: 2014-12-22
#5524772 Posted on: 03/02/2018 05:02 PM
Was so wanting a BF Bad Company game. Come on DICE! WWII? It's been done so much.
Was so wanting a BF Bad Company game. Come on DICE! WWII? It's been done so much.
Gorey
Member
Posts: 22
Joined: 2014-06-02
Member
Posts: 22
Joined: 2014-06-02
#5524856 Posted on: 03/02/2018 08:53 PM
Need a sequel to 2142.
Need a sequel to 2142.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 491
Joined: 2017-02-17
Whelp, there goes a naming structure... Since V doesn't make a lot of sense... then again naming never made much sense to them... BF 1942, BF2, BF2142, BF3, BF4, BF Hardline, BF1 now BFV (or 5)... Kinda miss BF2142 honestly