Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Corsair QL120 and QL140 RGB fan review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Corsair Void RGB Elite Wireless Headset review
Team Group PD400 Portable SSD review
AMD Athlon 3000G review
Team Group T-Force Delta Max 1 TB SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - November 2019
ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme Encore review
Toshiba RC500 500GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
Promo: URcdkey Black Friday Windows 10 Pro for $12

New Downloads
3DMark Download v2.11.6846 + Port Royale
HWiNFO64 Download v6.20
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 19.12.1 driver download
Crystal DiskMark Download v7.0.0f
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download v2.1.0.1424
Quake II RTX Download v1.2
GeForce 441.41 WHQL driver download
Oculus TrayTool download v0.86.3.1
AMD Chipset Drivers Download v1.11.22.0454
Download AMD RAID Driver (SATA, NVMe RAID) v9.3.0.38


New Forum Topics
The AMD Ryzen All In One Tread /Overclocking/Memory Speeds & Timings/Tweaking/Cooling Part 2 SanDisk SSD Plus Goes 2 TB on SATA3 MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio watercooled getting spool coils Windows 10 random shutdown Review: Corsair QL120 and QL140 RGB fans New Upcoming ATI/AMD GPU's Thread: Leaks, Hopes & Aftermarket GPU's Part 2 Download: AMD chipset driver revision 1.9.27.1033 Review: Core i9 10980XE processor (Intel 18-core galore) AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 19.12.1 driver download & discussion Guru3D 2019 December 6th contest: Win a Ryzen 5 3600X (6c/12t) processor




Guru3D.com » News » Intel Xe Rumors: Development reportedly stagnating and efficiency worse than its competitors

Intel Xe Rumors: Development reportedly stagnating and efficiency worse than its competitors

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 12/04/2019 08:15 AM | source: gamestar | 37 comment(s)
Intel Xe Rumors: Development reportedly stagnating and efficiency worse than its competitors

Intel received a lot of coverage on Xe, their enterprise and gaming GPU that should hit the market in 2020. The coverage was mostly due to the fact that several key staff from AMD moved to Intel to take control of the product. However, something is going on.

Last week several key staff members that last year joined the GPU team, left Intel. And now new rumors have surfaced, not particularly good ones. I will say this though, these are rumors, as vague as can be and nothing else. 

Intel's first dedicated graphics card Xe should be released June 2020 but was already pushed back to 'late' 2020. Rumors, however, seem to get significant delays and technical problems. Under the direction of chief architect Raja M. Koduri (ex-AMD), the first models based on the in-house 10nm design for the desktop, mobile applications, workstations and data centers should be available by 2020. More recently we have seen announcements forecasted for exascale servers codenamed Ponte Vecchio. Believing current rumors, it seems Intel's advances in the development of Xe GPUs have stalled. And the efficiency of the chips should be well below that of the competition. The information comes from the forum member »wjm47196« of the Chinese website Chiphell.com (via Wccftech). It is not clear where he obtained that information, but some of them are very vague and superficial, others are more detailed. We summarize the key statements in bullet points:

  • Work on the Xe GPUs does not seem to be going well
  • Ponte Vecchio is unlikely to arrive within the next two years
  • Currently, the efficiency of the Xe architecture is relatively low compared to the competition
  • For the time being, there are no plans for custom models of Xe graphics cards
  • Drivers would need a lot of time to improve

An official statement from Intel is not available at the time of writing the message.

Intel has used Supercomputing 2019 (SC19) to announce a new category of GPUs based on the Xe architecture and was promoting the Xe GPUs as purpose-built for data centre artificial intelligence and high performance computing (HPC) workloads, rather than gaming. The chip giant has named the compute-focused graphics processing unit after a bridge in Florence -- the Ponte Vecchio.

 







Rate this story
Rating:

« MMD reveals the Quad HD (2560 x 1440) Philips 276C8 monitor · Intel Xe Rumors: Development reportedly stagnating and efficiency worse than its competitors · Guru3D 2019 December 4th contest: Win a Fractal Design Case, PSU and Cooler »

Related Stories

Intel Xe Rumors: Development stagnating and efficiency worse than its competitors - 12/04/2019 08:14 AM
Intel received a lot fo coverage on Xe, their enterprise and gaming GPU that should hit the market in 2020. The coverage was mostly due to the fact that several key staff froM AMD moved to Intel to ta...

Intel Xe Discrete Graphics based on 7nm - has HBM and carries codenamed Ponte Vecchio - 11/14/2019 08:09 AM
Intel has released a bit of info on their Xe line of GPUs, and that info is rather limited. First off, the product will be fabbed at a 7nm node. Secondly, and yeah think of this what you will, it's g...

Intel Xe graphics card spotted in benchmark database (no benchmarks though). - 11/08/2019 08:29 AM
By 2020 Intel's first graphics cards based on the Xe architecture will be released. The first test phase has already been completed, as Intels Robert "Bob" H. Swan mentioned in a statemen...

Intel Xeon E-2200 Processors Launch With Hardware Security Built-in - 11/01/2019 11:26 AM
Intel's Xeon E-2200 processors are available, bringing enhanced security usages with the additional layer of hardware-based security and manageability made possible by Intel Software Guard Extensions...

Raja Koduri hints at June 2020 Intel Xe graphics card launch - 10/07/2019 02:29 PM
For those that have been living under a rock and w onder who the man is, Raja Koduri was the guy behind many Radeon GPUs, and then moved to Intel where he is working on Xe amongst other things. Now, ...


3 pages 1 2 3


cryohellinc
Senior Member



Posts: 2747
Joined: 2014-10-20

#5737535 Posted on: 12/04/2019 09:15 AM
I'm sure they will squueze out something next year. Question is - how good it will be?

Consumer GPU market badly needs competition. Otherwise 3080Ti @1500+ Eur.

0blivious
Senior Member



Posts: 2597
Joined: 2006-04-25

#5737538 Posted on: 12/04/2019 09:24 AM
These rumors sound like the normal process of creating an entirely new product that Intel has never produced before. Still less efficient than the competition is? Drivers need work? Is that really a surprise? It would be more shocking to read the opposite.

I hope Intel succeeds. We could use a 3rd player.

bernek
Senior Member



Posts: 1473
Joined: 2006-02-18

#5737546 Posted on: 12/04/2019 10:02 AM
The problem is with Intel slow pace it will take years to at least be truly competitive with AMD / Nvidia ... you can't just build a GPU lineup in 1-2 years and even be competitive ... they will create some kind of "monster" that will maybe find its way in a very narrow niche but not a card that go against the latest flagship cards from the current competitors.

My hopes are up for NAVI high end cards but beating nvidia is a very hard job. AMD succeded vs Intel in the CPU segment this year and did manage some hard blows but with the history of AMD videocards vs NVIDIA they will have to do much more to be able to actually take the crown.

The years of development for both AMD/NVIDIA can't be matched by Intel with their IGPU experience or Raja *cough* former AMD ...

Competition is always good and thats why I hope in 5 years maybe Intel will be present on GPU market with something viable but I dont have a lifetime to wait for them ... in the meantime I will buy the best price/peformance ratio card .....

PrMinisterGR
Senior Member



Posts: 7005
Joined: 2014-09-27

#5737548 Posted on: 12/04/2019 10:08 AM
These rumors sound like the normal process of creating an entirely new product that Intel has never produced before. Still less efficient than the competition is? Drivers need work? Is that really a surprise? It would be more shocking to read the opposite.

I hope Intel succeeds. We could use a 3rd player.
Intel has been making GPUs since the i740. I would love to have them as a legitimate 3rd player, but they seem unable to produce anything that anyone would like to use, except laptop users. Even in that case, every serious workstation laptop gets away from Intel GPUs the millisecond thermals allow it.

Venix
Senior Member



Posts: 1003
Joined: 2016-08-01

#5737551 Posted on: 12/04/2019 10:24 AM
well let's hope they can solve the problems ... i am wondering with arm hiring lead devs to optimise for graphics engines like unreal engine etc .... if arm is preparing to do a " Surprise now we are making Desktop Gpus too ! " most likely is for their mobile stuff ...but how awesome would be to have 4 gpu companies beating each other to the punch and have an all out price war ? ! !! i really wish
best of luck on all of em ... more competition is good for our pockets !

Astyanax
Senior Member



Posts: 3876
Joined: 2018-03-21

#5737559 Posted on: 12/04/2019 10:55 AM
Intel has been making GPUs since the i740. I would love to have them as a legitimate 3rd player, but they seem unable to produce anything that anyone would like to use, except laptop users. Even in that case, every serious workstation laptop gets away from Intel GPUs the millisecond thermals allow it.


the i740 was not an Intel design, like many of intel's GMA chips it was a design inherited through company aquisition and technology agreements.

The chip combining 2d of C&T with 3d pipeline by Real3D was named Intel740.


QBI
Member



Posts: 41
Joined: 2017-12-01

#5737572 Posted on: 12/04/2019 11:26 AM
Intel better aim for enterprise sector with their GPUs rather than consumers.
Knowing their product pricing I doubt they can compete with Nvidia and AMD.

kakiharaFRS
Senior Member



Posts: 215
Joined: 2015-11-21

#5737575 Posted on: 12/04/2019 11:33 AM
I'm sure they will squueze out something next year. Question is - how good it will be?
Consumer GPU market badly needs competition. Otherwise 3080Ti @1500+ Eur.
has been said by pretty much all the pc hardware journalists (I mean youtubers and websites) that this would be a work gpu and not a gaming one so it'll be a 3080ti >< I hope it wont be 1500€

Silva
Senior Member



Posts: 966
Joined: 2013-06-04

#5737600 Posted on: 12/04/2019 12:38 PM
Intel being Intel, what's new?
And I sure hope Raja burn in hell, putting HBM on consumer products was the worst ever decision to make at the time.
Consumer GPU market badly needs competition. Otherwise 3080Ti @1500+ Eur.

2080Ti is already +1500€ here, more like +2000€.

Fox2232
Senior Member



Posts: 9762
Joined: 2012-07-20

#5737604 Posted on: 12/04/2019 12:48 PM
Intel being Intel, what's new?
And I sure hope Raja burn in hell, putting HBM on consumer products was the worst ever decision to make at the time.

2080Ti is already +1500€ here, more like +2000€.
It was only way to deliver competitive performance in 300W TDP with given GPU architecture and manufacturing process. Especially since at that point GCN needed pretty high memory bandwidth. And Fiji gained more from HBM OC than from core OC.

barbacot
Senior Member



Posts: 244
Joined: 2007-09-24

#5737611 Posted on: 12/04/2019 01:08 PM
Me and my boys STILL waiting for INTEL to get their s**t in order:



BLEH!
Senior Member



Posts: 5898
Joined: 2010-10-17

#5737614 Posted on: 12/04/2019 01:18 PM
Seems a lot like their CPUs...

warlord
Senior Member



Posts: 2432
Joined: 2012-10-22

#5737621 Posted on: 12/04/2019 01:36 PM
Intel seems that got into some deep trouble. Aging cpu performance, inability to provide gpu breakthrough. I wonder all those billions spent, more money than amd and Nvidia together, were are those now? Lost capital?

H83
Senior Member



Posts: 2747
Joined: 2009-09-08

#5737627 Posted on: 12/04/2019 01:47 PM
These rumors sound like the normal process of creating an entirely new product that Intel has never produced before. Still less efficient than the competition is? Drivers need work? Is that really a surprise? It would be more shocking to read the opposite.

I hope Intel succeeds. We could use a 3rd player.

This^^ No matter how much talent or money Intel has available, developing a GPU from scratch is going to take time and effort before they can be as good as AMD or Nvidia, who have been doing it for the 20 or 30 years.
I just hope Intel is in this for the long run otherwise they will pull the plug pretty quickly...

fantaskarsef
Senior Member



Posts: 11021
Joined: 2014-07-21

#5737628 Posted on: 12/04/2019 01:47 PM
Where Intel's money is? I know where it comes from:

And look at the mid, right, chip technology.

And also look at bottom right, accelerators, no wonder Intel want's to grab that part as well (competing with Nvidia there), completing their supercomputer segment to become the monopoly competitor.

3 pages 1 2 3


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2019