Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for under 10 USD
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
ADATA SE800 1TB Portable SSD review
Promo: Microsoft Office 2016 for $29.82
Corsair H100i RGB Pro XT liquid cooler review
Corsair K95 RGB PLATINUM XT review
AORUS Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G review
Endgame XM1 gaming mouse review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - December 2019
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Spotted in FF XV Benchmark - 8% faster
The upcoming week you'll see the GeForce RTX 2080 Super being launched. The graphics cards have a notch more shader processors and new faster GDD6 memory. One of the cards already was spotted in the Final Fantasy XV benchmark.
A benchmark result has appeared in the online database of the game. The Final Fantasy XV benchmark database shows a score of 8663. That is about 8% more than what the regular 2080 can achieve, but with a 14% higher result, the 2080 Ti is still always the leading the pack. The GeForce RTX 2080 Super will be priced at 699 USD for the founder edition, that's a hundred bucks cheaper than the original RTX 2080 at launch. Keep an eye out at Guru3D at the 23rd, as we'll have some reviews ready.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 TI SUPER is not going to happen soon (if at all) - 07/16/2019 04:03 PM
A number of websites are creating chatter and noise on the web about a possible GeForce RTX 2080 Ti SUPER, in specific that it might not be released. The rumors started during the announcements of the...
Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Strix - 07/12/2019 01:24 PM
It is a bit of an exclusive, as we've been promised to have the one single media sample of the STRIX in the entire EU. Yes, we review the ASUS GeForce RTX 2060 Strix, NVIDIA has launched graphics car...
Download: NVIDIA GeForce 431.36 WHQL driver - 07/09/2019 02:46 PM
NVIDIA just released GeForce 431.36 WHQL drivers for download. This release adds support the new GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER as well as offering a number of fixes. Download...
Review: MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Gaming X TRIO - 07/09/2019 02:02 PM
We review the MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Gaming X TRIO, NVIDIA has launched graphics cards in their new Super series, as in super-charged. GeForce RTX 2070 Super, of course, is based on a Turing TU104...
Review: Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER JetStream - 07/09/2019 02:01 PM
We review the Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER JetStream. Now based on a Turing TU104 chip NVIDIA has launched this graphics cards with a Super tag, as in super-charged. Palit beefed up that GFPU with a h...
fl2015
Senior Member
Posts: 102
Joined: 2015-06-23
Senior Member
Posts: 102
Joined: 2015-06-23
#5693090 Posted on: 07/21/2019 06:16 PM
So 13-14% faster than a 2070S for 40% more money.
So 13-14% faster than a 2070S for 40% more money.
kwazyivan
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 2019-07-21
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 2019-07-21
#5693091 Posted on: 07/21/2019 06:26 PM
I've overclocked my 2080 Ti to a very stable performance which now matches the TITAN RTX
Check link below:
1440p Results = https://imgur.com/a/cvGanM8
2160p Resuts = https://imgur.com/a/5NeTfTp
EDIT:
New 1440p 2080Ti Results beats TITAN RTX
= https://imgur.com/a/5qeDD8m
I've overclocked my 2080 Ti to a very stable performance which now matches the TITAN RTX
Check link below:
1440p Results = https://imgur.com/a/cvGanM8
2160p Resuts = https://imgur.com/a/5NeTfTp
EDIT:
Nope, its still losing. In the PC Master Race, it doesn't matter if you win by 100fps or 1fps. When you win, you win; and when you win, you are worth that $2499 to some people. :p
New 1440p 2080Ti Results beats TITAN RTX
= https://imgur.com/a/5qeDD8m
vdelvec
Senior Member
Posts: 154
Joined: 2015-09-25
Senior Member
Posts: 154
Joined: 2015-09-25
#5693111 Posted on: 07/21/2019 08:43 PM
I've overclocked my 2080 Ti to a very stable performance which now matches the TITAN RTX
Check link below:
1440p Results = https://imgur.com/a/cvGanM8
2160p Resuts = https://imgur.com/a/5NeTfTp
Nope, its still losing. In the PC Master Race, it doesn't matter if you win by 100fps or 1fps. When you win, you win; and when you win, you are worth that $2499 to some people. :p
I've overclocked my 2080 Ti to a very stable performance which now matches the TITAN RTX
Check link below:
1440p Results = https://imgur.com/a/cvGanM8
2160p Resuts = https://imgur.com/a/5NeTfTp
Nope, its still losing. In the PC Master Race, it doesn't matter if you win by 100fps or 1fps. When you win, you win; and when you win, you are worth that $2499 to some people. :p
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 9016
Joined: 2004-05-10
Senior Member
Posts: 9016
Joined: 2004-05-10
#5693112 Posted on: 07/21/2019 08:43 PM
hmm look at that Titan Rtx go.. I would rather have that lol xD
No bad for a 2080super either, overclock and get near Ti perf...
I already saw 4 offers few days ago, preorder with 800€+.. a bit overkill atm.
https://geizhals.eu/?cat=gra16_512&xf=653_NVIDIA~9810_9+10138+-+RTX+2080+SUPER
edit:
Re 4k too much for a RTX Titan... they just dont know how to adjust settings to be playable at minimum visual loss. Many reviewers dont fiddle with settings and just set a 'blanket ultra' on everything to do their reviews quick.
My own results with regular 2080 (SOTR):
hmm look at that Titan Rtx go.. I would rather have that lol xD
No bad for a 2080super either, overclock and get near Ti perf...
I already saw 4 offers few days ago, preorder with 800€+.. a bit overkill atm.
https://geizhals.eu/?cat=gra16_512&xf=653_NVIDIA~9810_9+10138+-+RTX+2080+SUPER
edit:
Re 4k too much for a RTX Titan... they just dont know how to adjust settings to be playable at minimum visual loss. Many reviewers dont fiddle with settings and just set a 'blanket ultra' on everything to do their reviews quick.
My own results with regular 2080 (SOTR):
beta-sama
Senior Member
Posts: 137
Joined: 2012-11-14
Senior Member
Posts: 137
Joined: 2012-11-14
#5693126 Posted on: 07/21/2019 10:44 PM
Yeah no thanks...
http://benchmark.finalfantasyxv.com/result/?i=7503839225d34dbd7ece6a&Resolution=2560x1440&Quality=High
Yeah no thanks...
http://benchmark.finalfantasyxv.com/result/?i=7503839225d34dbd7ece6a&Resolution=2560x1440&Quality=High
UZ7
Senior Member
Posts: 5498
Joined: 2003-04-26
Senior Member
Posts: 5498
Joined: 2003-04-26
#5693159 Posted on: 07/22/2019 03:25 AM
Guess time to upgrade
Guess time to upgrade
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 9016
Joined: 2004-05-10
Senior Member
Posts: 9016
Joined: 2004-05-10
#5693161 Posted on: 07/22/2019 04:17 AM
Guess time to upgrade
Upgrade to 4k.
Guess time to upgrade
Upgrade to 4k.
Clawedge
Senior Member
Posts: 2490
Joined: 2006-09-02
Senior Member
Posts: 2490
Joined: 2006-09-02
#5693197 Posted on: 07/22/2019 08:03 AM
8% increase in performance is now considered news worthy.
This is the most pathetic state of gpus I have seen to date.
8% increase in performance is now considered news worthy.
This is the most pathetic state of gpus I have seen to date.
Petr V
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2018-08-04
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2018-08-04
#5693201 Posted on: 07/22/2019 08:24 AM
Re 4k too much for a RTX Titan... they just dont know how to adjust settings to be playable at minimum visual loss. Many reviewers dont fiddle with settings and just set a 'blanket ultra' on everything to do their reviews quick.
My own results with regular 2080 (SOTR):
Nice results for 4k but for all maxed is 4080ti needed.
Re 4k too much for a RTX Titan... they just dont know how to adjust settings to be playable at minimum visual loss. Many reviewers dont fiddle with settings and just set a 'blanket ultra' on everything to do their reviews quick.
My own results with regular 2080 (SOTR):
Nice results for 4k but for all maxed is 4080ti needed.
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 9016
Joined: 2004-05-10
Senior Member
Posts: 9016
Joined: 2004-05-10
#5693218 Posted on: 07/22/2019 10:25 AM
Bollocks
.
I should clarify. You can probably even find some 1080p game where even a Titan RTX cant technically max out "everything" (if the user insists of trolling himself and others) with ridiculous settings like MSAA x8, full RTX on, HBAO+ at 144 fps, etc, without addressing what is the most visually appealing aspect of a game graphically. And the single most visually appealing aspect of ANY game lies in increased resolution, period. Above all else! Even if you have to bring down some other settings (usually inconsequential, ie, motion blur, level of shadows, type and degree of AA esp at 4k, etc). But increased res doesnt do much if you are stuck on a small screen, ie, 24".
With a proper size screen, increase in res MORE than makes up for whatever settings you may have to bring down, and again, usually involving settings that hardly make any visual difference at all. If you max out everything at 1080p on a small screen, it will still pale in comparison to something not maxed out at 4k (on larger screen). You may not care about visuals and just want to be competitive at 144 fps in a fast paced game, but thats another thing altogether. Gamers have different priorities. Some have more fun with CSGO and Quake at 144fps and dont care about crappy visuals, while others prefer more visually appealing, slower paced games even if at lower FPS.
Nice results for 4k but for all maxed is 4080ti needed.
Bollocks
.I should clarify. You can probably even find some 1080p game where even a Titan RTX cant technically max out "everything" (if the user insists of trolling himself and others) with ridiculous settings like MSAA x8, full RTX on, HBAO+ at 144 fps, etc, without addressing what is the most visually appealing aspect of a game graphically. And the single most visually appealing aspect of ANY game lies in increased resolution, period. Above all else! Even if you have to bring down some other settings (usually inconsequential, ie, motion blur, level of shadows, type and degree of AA esp at 4k, etc). But increased res doesnt do much if you are stuck on a small screen, ie, 24".
With a proper size screen, increase in res MORE than makes up for whatever settings you may have to bring down, and again, usually involving settings that hardly make any visual difference at all. If you max out everything at 1080p on a small screen, it will still pale in comparison to something not maxed out at 4k (on larger screen). You may not care about visuals and just want to be competitive at 144 fps in a fast paced game, but thats another thing altogether. Gamers have different priorities. Some have more fun with CSGO and Quake at 144fps and dont care about crappy visuals, while others prefer more visually appealing, slower paced games even if at lower FPS.
Petr V
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2018-08-04
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2018-08-04
#5693274 Posted on: 07/22/2019 01:51 PM
Bollocks.
I should clarify. You can probably even find some 1080p game where even a Titan RTX cant technically max out "everything" (if the user insists of trolling himself and others) with gratuitous settings like MSAA x8, full RTX on, HBAO+ at 144 fps, etc, without addressing what is the most visually appealing aspect of a game graphically. And the single most visually appealing aspect of ANY game lies in increased resolution, period. Above all else! Even if you have to bring down some other settings (usually inconsequential, ie, motion blur, level of shadows, type and degree of AA esp at 4k, etc). But increased res doesnt do much if you are stuck on a small screen, ie, 24".
With a proper size screen, increase in res MORE than makes up for whatever settings you may have to bring down, and again, usually involving settings that hardly make any visual difference at all. If you max out everything at 1080p on a small screen, it will still pale in comparison to something not maxed out at 4k (on larger screen). You may not care about visuals and just want to be competitive at 144 fps in a fast paced game, but thats another thing altogether. Gamers have different priorities. Some have more fun with CSGO and Quake at 144fps and dont care about crappy visuals, while others prefer more visually appealing, slower paced games even if at lower FPS.
I played same build of SOTR like you in 1080p 144hz all maxed - Paititi map and performance was pretty bad and it was on 2080 also.They really need to do some GPU performance improvement for new games if you dont want to play Quake 2 rtx on it.
Bollocks
.I should clarify. You can probably even find some 1080p game where even a Titan RTX cant technically max out "everything" (if the user insists of trolling himself and others) with gratuitous settings like MSAA x8, full RTX on, HBAO+ at 144 fps, etc, without addressing what is the most visually appealing aspect of a game graphically. And the single most visually appealing aspect of ANY game lies in increased resolution, period. Above all else! Even if you have to bring down some other settings (usually inconsequential, ie, motion blur, level of shadows, type and degree of AA esp at 4k, etc). But increased res doesnt do much if you are stuck on a small screen, ie, 24".
With a proper size screen, increase in res MORE than makes up for whatever settings you may have to bring down, and again, usually involving settings that hardly make any visual difference at all. If you max out everything at 1080p on a small screen, it will still pale in comparison to something not maxed out at 4k (on larger screen). You may not care about visuals and just want to be competitive at 144 fps in a fast paced game, but thats another thing altogether. Gamers have different priorities. Some have more fun with CSGO and Quake at 144fps and dont care about crappy visuals, while others prefer more visually appealing, slower paced games even if at lower FPS.
I played same build of SOTR like you in 1080p 144hz all maxed - Paititi map and performance was pretty bad and it was on 2080 also.They really need to do some GPU performance improvement for new games if you dont want to play Quake 2 rtx on it.
Petr V
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2018-08-04
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2018-08-04
#5693279 Posted on: 07/22/2019 01:58 PM
8% increase in performance is now considered news worthy.
This is the most pathetic state of gpus I have seen to date.
Ye dat is really super state.
8% increase in performance is now considered news worthy.
This is the most pathetic state of gpus I have seen to date.
Ye dat is really super state.
mohiuddin
Senior Member
Posts: 779
Joined: 2010-11-06
Senior Member
Posts: 779
Joined: 2010-11-06
#5693281 Posted on: 07/22/2019 02:00 PM
Super stagnant state. :p
Ye dat is really super state.
Super stagnant state. :p
Petr V
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2018-08-04
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: 2018-08-04
#5693285 Posted on: 07/22/2019 02:12 PM
I wonder how much NV will take for new 30 series GPUs and if they will be on 7nm.
Super stagnant state. :p
I wonder how much NV will take for new 30 series GPUs and if they will be on 7nm.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 16503
Joined: 2012-05-18
hmm look at that Titan Rtx go.. I would rather have that lol xD
No bad for a 2080super either, overclock and get near Ti perf...
I already saw 4 offers few days ago, preorder with 800€+.. a bit overkill atm.
https://geizhals.eu/?cat=gra16_512&xf=653_NVIDIA~9810_9+10138+-+RTX+2080+SUPER
edit: